User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Meikai
-
2023-08-10 at 12:15 PM UTC in whoring
Originally posted by Meikai how much you think i can charge? im no spring chicken, and even in my 'prime' i never made more than $100 sleeping with someone… how many dick do you think i'd need to suck to make a couple hundred dollars now that i'm in my 30s and there are boatloads of far more attractive, younger troons for old men to molest?
im broke af and need the cash
I dunno...lets ask Bradley...
Bradders how much cash do you have? -
2023-08-10 at 11:19 AM UTC in whoring
Originally posted by Meikai hmmm good insight but idk man. can i rly believe that? like this sounds reasonable… i feel like appearances definitely matter tho?
Of course, but men like different appearances. There's a lot of successful older and not great looking hookers. They generally need to work harder and provide a better quality of service though.when there's a strung out thot half her age charging a similar amount u no?
People pay for convenience and variety. Sex purchasers tend to go for what is available and also go for variety. So they tend to want to switch around. That's why you get so many touring hookers, the clients always want something new.
Also strung out thots are a nuisance and a head-wrecker, and no one is going to understand how a penis works better than someone who has one.(no this thread isn't serious. i mean, the whoring part isn't anyway. i'm still definitely broke with a desperate need for money. and selling holes is the only way i'd be able to make money, but still… not werf it if i'd hafta cheat on scron.)
Meh, sex work is work. -
2023-08-10 at 9:16 AM UTC in whoringIt's all about marketing. You should be able to get $50 for a blow and go, no matter what you look like. Longer sessions should be at least $150 an hour. Tranners are generally a little more expensive than bonus-hole havers. But the hard part is advertising and sourcing clients and making sure they show up. And if you're staying in one location encouraging repeat business.
-
2023-08-10 at 9:06 AM UTC in whoringposting in a yucky thread
-
2023-08-09 at 4:46 PM UTC in Which one?
Originally posted by Meikai I go back 5 seconds, and then I go back 5 seconds, and I go back 5 seconds etc etc - "going back 5 seconds" is really "going back infinitely in 5 second increments". After our hands are revealed, I can just go back to when the cards were dealt with not only knowledge of people's hands, but how everything else about the game will develop. Not only is this better for poker, it is a downright god-tier super power.
(Obviously this is cheating and if you can really just go back 5 seconds but arbitrarily only once per hand for whatever reason then yeah that's kinda not great compared to knowing everyone's hands. Although, that said, even with some arbitrary cap on it, 5 seconds has way more non-poker utility so it's kind of better to pick for that reason. But if all we care about is poker, and with all the arbitrary restrictions in place that make it obviously worse than the other thing, then yeah: it's obviously worse. )
Goddamn that was a really good argument. But is it superior to knowing all hands? Like I get what you're saying oh huehue you can just keep going back but no. You can't keep doing more 5 seconds. Just once per hand. Fuck. I'm backtracking to make my own argument that isn't even an argument. How do you do this?
You are one of the funniest smartest people I've ever met HTS. I'm derailing the shit out of this thread but you teally are.
But honestly in terms of winning, knowing all hands at all times, you would know when to do anything. Of course rewinding 5 seconds helps but yeah you can't rewind more than 5. Fuck you I get it. Fuck you -
2023-08-09 at 2:50 PM UTC in The Tyranny of the Dumb-Dumb Idiot
-
2023-08-09 at 2:09 PM UTC in Alex Jones/Infowars has been deleted from youtube
-
2023-08-09 at 2:07 PM UTC in The Tyranny of the Dumb-Dumb Idiot
Originally posted by Meikai It's not a new thing, it's not "why the west is weak" thing. It's literally a "the shape of society" thing. Fundamentally, "civilization as an endeavor humans have undertaken" has been an effort in the domestication of humanity by sociopaths. The ones who they successfully domesticate are to be protected so they can continually be exploited. The ones who are less easy to exploit - or who would exploit the flock in a way not beneficial to the sociopaths in power (low functioning sociopaths, and high functioning sociopaths who for whatever reason are not part of the ruling group) - must be destroyed to protect the flock, else the high functioning sociopaths not in the ruling group will foment a rebellion amongst the sheep and install themselves with a promise to protect where the previous sociopaths were not.
The worst thing to be in society is anything other than the shepherd or the sheep. All else are wolves.
This is true in Russia, China, the US, Canada, Australia - ideologies are just different designs of shepherd's crook. Different aesthetics masking the same underlying reality.
you're not wrong; other cultures have their own ideological gatekeepers and shit tests.
but that article (the first one) is interesting as it ties together exactly how it's happened and what the result is, the second is a much longer essay but goes deep into how 'education' has been totally subverted in favour of ideological indoctrination -
2023-08-09 at 4:49 AM UTC in The difference between me and you is that all of you think it's cool to be addicts...You can stick me all you want.. You wanna hurt me?
Go right ahead if it makes ya feel any better. Iβm an easy target. Yeah. Youβre right. I talk too much. I also listen too much. I could be a cold-hearted cynic like you, but I donβt like to hurt peopleβs feelings. Well, you think what you want about me. Iβm not changinβ. I like me. My kids like me. My friends like me. βCause iβm the real article. What you see is what you get. -
2023-08-09 at 4:36 AM UTC in The Tyranny of the Dumb-Dumb Idiothttps://gaiusbaltar.substack.com/p/why-is-the-west-so-weak-and-russia
https://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2019/10/Arion-Camille-Paglia-Junkbonds-Corporate-Raiders.pdf
it's intentional
ideology over competence -
2023-08-06 at 11 PM UTC in What bothers me the most about Peedy is that he disrespected Wren...Folks, and it happened again and again
-
2023-08-06 at 4:58 PM UTC in I read a couple local newspapers andThere's no one inside the clock it's a bunch of gears and shit, like imagine the factory size version of a grandfather clock a bunch of polocks smushed into the top of the tower so other dumb polocks in the area would know how long they got to get to work. No one is inside the clock part of the cocktower.
-
2023-08-06 at 4:56 PM UTC in I read a couple local newspapers andPlease don't shoot up innocent people trying to get to their min wage jobs. Pick better targets.
-
2023-08-06 at 3:59 PM UTC in troons r good and u shud treat me like a girl >:(
Originally posted by jerryb As I've gotten older I've pretty much say people should do what makes them happy. You're not harming anyone with your choices so do what makes you happy.
I only have a problem with those crazy bitches convincing little kids they are not what they where born as.
Trust me life goes by fast so don't waste your time on negative people because you'll never please them.
By now you understand I enjoy talking shit, right? This isn't time wasted. -
2023-08-06 at 1:31 PM UTC in troons r good and u shud treat me like a girl >:(i can accept trans women as people with cancerous growth between their legs that look like a penis.
yea, i can accept that. -
2023-08-06 at 12 PM UTC in troons r good and u shud treat me like a girl >:(we could be friends but I wouldn't respect your pronouns or fuck you
-
2023-08-06 at 8:14 AM UTC in Was watching the women's World Cup this morningworld cunp
-
2023-08-06 at 6:10 AM UTC in I just almost shit myself
-
2023-08-05 at 5:13 PM UTC in The horrifying results of defunding the police
Originally posted by β β β β β β The only solution to crime is machine guns. More machine guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens means less criminals robbing them of their hard-earned money. It's not hard math. You rob, you get machine-gunned down in cold blood. Seems like a workable solution to me.
I unironically agree with this to a degree, but at what point does the individual's ability to 'equalise' combat against greater and greater numbers of attackers actually start to become more of a problem than the crime it's meant to hedge against?
in essence being armed allows a woman to defeat a larger, stronger man who means to harm her - a single-shot pistol would do the job. what if there were two men? you'd need more than one bullet. if she's anxious or nervous, probably a lot more.
at what point should it stop though? fully automatic weapons allow you or a small team to use fire team tactics, but can also be used to take a group by surprise and kill them quickly. man-portable rocket weapons can defend against light vehicles but can also be be used to destroy a train or a plane as it takes off or lands. nuclear weapons serve as an effective deterrent but could be used to raze a city.
as weapons are made available to address power disparities between people and groups, they also empower the individual to use those weapons offensively or recklessly.
personally I'm all for legalisation of all kinds of weapons but I don't think it's possible for a society or state to function if the individual is empowered in such a way, past some point or other -
2023-08-05 at 4:48 PM UTC in "Ain't nothing you can do" - scholar raids Sikh owned store