User Controls
Posts by Meikai
-
2020-10-03 at 12:29 AM UTC in Trump and wife have Covid 19.
Originally posted by -SpectraL The lefties can cry and hoot all they want, but Trump will be winning the 2020 election, at which point he will pack the Supreme Court, and the Republicans will retain control of the Senate and win back the House. The Dems will be left with absolutely nothing. And then they're all going to get squeezed through the state funding bans. It's going to be something else to witness. These nutjobs think they're beat now, just wait.
Trump is going to be too fucking dead to win anything.
Cope harder, loser. -
2020-10-03 at 12:27 AM UTC in If Joe gets ill
Originally posted by stl1 Democrats are impressed by real people like Joe.
Not fancy showmen like P. T. Trump.
They don't feel the need to act the fool.
Even if he's "your guy" this year because the only other choice is more Trump, I think we should all at least be able to agree Joe isn't that impressive. -
2020-10-02 at 9:57 PM UTC in Trump and wife have Covid 19.
-
2020-10-02 at 4:59 PM UTC in Trump and wife have Covid 19.
-
2020-10-02 at 4:50 PM UTC in What are you listening to right now, space nigga?
The Omnissiah protects. -
2020-10-02 at 4:19 PM UTC in Trump and wife have Covid 19.
-
2020-10-02 at 4 PM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
-
2020-10-02 at 3:34 PM UTC in Speedy Parker is a Russian botAll he does is post far-right extremist conspiracy theorists like Dinesh D'Souza in a shallow attempt to disrupt American unity. His account has clearly either been compromised or he's been working for Putin all along (just like his hero, the president).
-
2020-10-02 at 4:50 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
Originally posted by aldra I hope you're just messing around and don't consider this to be reasonable or sensible use of language
I... do consider that a sensible use of language, because it is the Semitic language group, and "semitism" insofar as it relates to linguistics is merely a trait of the languages within that language group. -
2020-10-02 at 4:39 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
Originally posted by aldra oh, so even though 'semitism' refers to a language group that contains Arabic and others, when we talk about 'antisemitism' the definition changes and we're only talking about j'ews.
because if it didn't israel would be the most antisemitic group on the planet.
Semitic refers to a language group. Semitism does not. And given that the concept of "antisemitism" and "being antisemitic" is not a matter of a linguistic prejudice but of a cultural/religious/racial one, the fact that it only refers to jedis in said context is not particularly noteworthy.
Is "antisemitic" a perfect word? Nope. But it has grown into the meaning it was given in this context, and there is nothing overly strange about it. -
2020-10-02 at 4:09 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
Originally posted by aldra so… semitism and antisemitism refer to different groups? that's kind of confusing
That isn't what I said now is it. I simply explained that in the context of antisemitism, "Semite" refers to a jedi person. Because that is the context in which you asked. Semitism is a word rarely used by comparison, although it can supposedly refer specifically to the jedi people also. "Semitic" however, has more broad meaning. As I said. -
2020-10-02 at 3:51 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
Originally posted by aldra A) Who are and aren't classified as 'Semites'?
B) Does criticism of the 'state' of israel constitute antisemitism?
A) In the context of "antisemitism", it is jedis. More broadly, there are many Semitic peoples, but in this specific context it refers to the Israelites and their descendants. Yes? Yes.
B) Not always, but usually. And even on the rare occasion that someone manages to criticize the state of Israel for a valid and factual thing without being overtly antisemitic, the person in question was usually motivated to criticize Israel in the first place by their underlying antisemtic sentiment. Is attacking Israeli policy inherently antisemitic? No. But antisemitic pieces of shit sure love to do it. -
2020-10-02 at 3:42 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?
Originally posted by rabbitweed Question for you my progressive transvestite friend - why are racial categories sometimes "nebulously defined", and sometimes not?
For example, when talking about BLM, no one ever says "ugh that's ridiculous I mean what exactly defines 'black'? checkmate losers".
Ditto with "anti-semitism", there's no hand-wringing about who is and isn't jedi. Progressives seem to know exactly what the racial categories are in these situations.
Anyway, let's say I use the same definition Harvard uses when selecting people for admission based on their race. Or maybe what the South African government does to financially penalize their white minority. Just to set some parameters about who or who isn't white, and avoid this pointless bickering.
1) There is constant confusion. White presenting/passing bpoc deal with unique struggles. Numerous times I have seen people get blasted on leftbook for "speaking for black people" or whatever, only for it to be revealed they are just really white passing and I've had the joy of watching a (fellow?) progressive have a fucking meltdown trying to backtrack. Black is just as nebulous a term, and it was foisted up on them when whites stole their heritage and their history. jedis are seen as white by others, many see themselves as white, many draw a distinction - so again, confusion.
2) There's no confusion when it comes to antisemitism because unlike "black" and "white", it is not nebulously defined. Even if "jedi" was nebulously defined (which it arguably isn't - matrilineal inheritance), the act of being prejudiced against that nebulously defined group is a much more easy thing to pin down. -
2020-10-02 at 3:14 AM UTC in Is it possible to die of laughter?You laugh, but you'll be lucky to live as fast as he does when you're his age.
-
2020-10-02 at 2:40 AM UTC in Antinatalism? Antivitalism.
-
2020-10-02 at 12:39 AM UTC in ATTN: Stand by
Originally posted by aldra that's just meant to form maintenance habits
I'm not a fan of Jordan 'wash your' Peterson either but most of that stuff is more about developing habits to improve your life, not a scientific method for success or some shit
Are you implying that not masturbating is part of some kind of scientific approach to successfulness? -
2020-10-02 at 12:37 AM UTC in What's so bad about White Supremacism anyway?It is an inherently non-factual ideology based around the belief that nebulously defined "whites" are intrinsically superior by some kind of equally nebulously defined objective measure? That it is fundamentally at odds with the state of the world, which shows whites on very clear downward and outward trajectory? That it reeks of a last desperate attempt to cling to glory that you had no part in?
-
2020-10-02 at 12:31 AM UTC in ATTN: Stand by
Originally posted by aldra I mean, I'd recommend you try not ejaculizing for a week or two so you can feel the difference yourself but I don't think it'd really work for you
Probably not. 😅
Still full of shit though, m8. Might as well be recommending I clean my room and see how that feels. Quackery. -
2020-10-01 at 11:48 PM UTC in ATTN: Stand by
Originally posted by aldra Sex is a biological imperative; when you're not having sex or jerking off you have the motivation and energy to seek out sexual partners. This energy can be easily redirected to other pursuits.
If you're jerking off regularly you're essentially tricking your body into thinking that need has been met, so you lose the drive and focus.
Proud Boys don't take a vow of abstinence. Jeff has a girlfriend and it's alright if she gives him 3 blowjobs a day, but the second Jeff decides to take it upon himself to spill some seed... HERESY. Now we'll NEVER be able to affect change!
Also this screams of pseudoscientific "clean your room" lobster man quackery. -
2020-10-01 at 11:32 PM UTC in ATTN: Stand by