Anyone who thinks Chauvin shouldn't go to jail is a statist cuck. I really can't understand any rational argument for him not going to jail. It's disgusting there are private citizens who think he shouldn't be held accountable. Fuck everyone. Everything is stupid and I'll fucking fight anyone on this website until my wrists and knuckles are bloody and sore.
I'll kill any fucking faggot who sucks pig dick. Your family is ugly, stupid and weak too. You don't deserve the air you breathe and the world is better off with you dead. Every cell in your body is weaker than the fermented shit of anyone who believes chauvin should be in jail. The cuckholdery is disgusting and dispicable and history with shake its head and weep that you were allowed to live in the world for this long. Fuck I wish you were here so I could kill you personally myself but such a person would be undoubtedly way too fearful of confrontation and appeal to law enforcement against an actual man. Fucking kill yourself then.
Free Rittenhouse. Let the kid off house arrest and drop the charges. Fuck your mom and hang yourself
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The simulation hypothesis holds that in a universe where ancestor simulations can happen as a result of intentional actions, the overwhelming likelihood is that they will happen at least once somewhere, and that in a universe where it happens at least once, the amount of simulated conscious observers in a particular reference class will vastly outnumber the number of unsimulated observers to the point where the relative chance of any given observer being unsimulated will be virtually zero.
According to the most modern state of neuroscience, human consciousness seems to be the result of physical processes involving our brain and thus seems to be simulatable within our own universe.
Thus the chances that any particular observer in our reference class (including you and I) are simulated are overwhelming. Thus the chances are that we exist within one of a massive number of ancestor simulations.
These simulations, being the results of intentional actions, would be controlled by some entity that is capable of conscious comprehension. This entity would have total control and perfect information of every aspect of our reality.
They could move stars around your sky at will to form pictures. They could return the save file of your dead loved ones and remove their cancerous organ with the save file of a healthy organ. They could give you superpowers or perform miracles. They could make reality retrospectively change to reflect and "rationalize" all their actions, including our memories, so it always seems to be consistent with natural phenomena.
Such a person would be fit to be called god and as demonstrated above, is likely to be existent relative to our reality.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Internet porn, especially the "big sites" (see: pornhub), hasn't/haven't been around for long. It doesn't require a jedi conspiracy for degenerate porn to be algorithmically pushed to the front page. It just requires degenerate porn to be popular. People's tastes evolve over time. I don't think this is a particularly controversial statement - people are desensitized to the familiar and seek out more and more fucked up stuff as time goes on. Accepting this to be true, we must then also accept the fact that there are always going to be more people looking for weird shit than there are people with totally vanilla taste. This is compounded by the fact that degenerate coomers are likely masturbating more frequently. There's more people, masturbating more frequently to weird shit. So it's on the front page. Simple.
If you think there's something wrong with the front page, it's more evidence that there's something wrong with porn in general - not that there's a sinister jedi cabal curating the front page for the express purpose of destabilizing nuclear families.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Data
I think she's just shy. Notice how she looked to her mom almost immediately. Why are you so rude
No. Shy or not, tears of joy arent even controllable they just automatically happen when you're overwhelmed with something that makes you happy. She looked at her mom like "oh shit I should probably be crying too" and then she made some weird face like she was trying to cry but couldn't.
She thinks its all a big JOKE. I'd actually taken out all of her teeth and lodge them into her mom's mouth for raising such an unappreciative BITCH of a daughter. Then I'd just sew the girl's mouth shut entirely and rape her until she died.
SHOW SOME GODDAMNED RESPECT!!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
She didnt even get emotional like her mom did when he said he'd pay for her braces, which means shes not actually grateful and she really doesnt give a shit.
If I was that guy, I'd teach her a lesson by putting her under and then mangling her teeth up way worse, knocking most of them out entirely, and then waking her up and showing her a mirror while I laughed maniacally in the background.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The protesters are mostly peaceful, which is more than can be said of the police they're protesting and more than can be said of the state which props them up.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Sophie
I've heard theories but i'd be interested in hearing your thoughts specifically.
basically 'they' scan outbound traffic from all the major VPS providers, then when they find one with a significant amount of tor/onion traffic they target that provider. Either using a subpoenis, some sort of arm-twisting or secret agreement, they have the VPS provider hand over internal data so that they can analyse the machines hosting TOR services themselves.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by netstat
setting up an onion service is usually less difficult than setting up a clearnet facing service since you don't have to deal with firewalls or NAT, basically just set up a service to run locally on the server as you would normally do for testing before deploying on the web, then point the tor process on your server at the port the service is listening at
Shitlibs and religious nutjobs believe that the only reason someone might disagree with their view of the world is because they have been misled or lied to.
The Abhrahamic faiths have Satan to blame, shitlibs have me.
That they can't convince you that they are right with logic or evidence or rationality is an enormous source of frustration for them.
You can't convince someone to come around to an irrational and internally inconsistent view of the world through logic.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
my theory has been that it's vital to aldra's learning process to start by assuming truth. this is based on my limited & unqualified observations in candid moments i see only here sometimes
i suspect of his cognition a priority verifying of new information happens only after he's already some ways down the conceptual road, allowing him to remain open & processing epistemologically in the manner of enzymatic predigestion
his faith is a gospel of hypotheticals & his simulations are more true than real. his welcoming taste grasps the origin & it's how he knows everything we eat comes from a different landfill
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Determinism implies that a man is simply the sum of his genetic material (nature) and its interaction with external stimuli, ie. the experiences of his life. This means that, generally speaking, the subject will innately tend toward a set path. Regardless of what situations are presented to the subject, the choices they make are informed by their nature and the results of their previous choices, creating a sort of inertia. The only situations that have the potential to defeat this inertia and change the subject's 'path' are extreme in nature, forcing them to abandon previously-held beliefs for example. The more controlled and regulated (in the sense of creating long-term predictability and consistency) a society, the less opportunity there is for these extreme instances, making the subject's 'path' much more practically predictable (in the sense that it would require much less time or computational power) given that one has access to their genetic material and early choices.
Much of the ennui of man comes from the duality of his existence as both individual and part of a collective. Culture aside (in the sense that some cultures value indvidual freedom over collective benefit or vice versa), a man is aware of himself having his own will (which includes his participation in a tribe or society) as well as his being a functional part of the species. In regards to the latter I refer specifically to inheritence - he inherits the traits (genes) and culture (memes) of his parents, and passes them to his offspring. His purpose in this sense is clear - continuation of the species, ideally with a 'good' partner in order to eugenically effect improvement in subsequent generations. His purpose as an individual is less obvious, leading to innumerable religions and ideologies attempting to 'solve the problem'. It seems likely, though, that individual purpose isn't a problem that can be solved - self-awareness and sentience evolved and (genetically) proliferated specifically as survival traits, and are beneficial only to the collective, not the idea of 'individuality' that they spawned. Without any reason for individualism, man's only real purpose is to make more and better men, and this simply means creating as much surviving offspring with a 'good' mate as possible. Anything beyond that, from hedonism to self-improvement to religious adherence, dies with the individual.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
