User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 178
  6. 179
  7. 180
  8. 181
  9. 182
  10. 183
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts by ORACLE

  1. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Japan-Is-Eternal He looks like adoring fan from oblivion.

    I already made that joke centuries ago loser

    And no I'm very attractive.

  2. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lardass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer... ive repeatedly stated im an octogenarian

    Look more like octomom
  3. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Hiki, when are you gonna put your money where your mouth is and shoot up a mosque?
  4. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Hiki is very transparently rattled by how objectively handsome Oct is, specially compared to his ugly virgin face.
  5. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Sudo I dont remember any tokerdoxxing but I do remember enter making it his mission to drive him off the site and taking credit for it.

    All he ever did was make noise tbh
  6. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Japan-Is-Eternal I remember that photo.
    She wasn't attractive at all, she looks like a generic bimbo.

  7. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Out of weed and my dark net package doesn't arrive for 2 days. Should I buy from my neighbor or just be sober for a couple days?
  8. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Oct, post the picture of yourself hanging out with attractive women
  9. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Voted for ugly faggot hiki
  10. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Shut the fuck up bitch.
  11. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Damn Hiki is one ugly mother fucker, is this what the white Aryan Chad is supposed to look like? Pathetic. He even looks pale in the dark.
  12. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Octavian What happened to Toker he was an interesting guy.

    He got embarrassed off the site because I doxxed him (lol Enter thought it was because he trolled him because he kept stealing jokes off the internet to try to be witty and clever)
  13. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Probably Tacho "Derailleur" Choochoo

    Or maybe Tokerface

    Or maybe Unstable Faggot (Sudo), but he has improved considerably over the years, everyone hated that guy when he was a tryhard faggot.
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny and they do this …. for what purpose ?

    They don't have a purpose, it's just a molecule that reacts a particular way.
  15. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny RNAs by themselves dont.

    Virus don't either.

    but viruses are nont just made up of RNAs, its the entire package. and by maintaining traits that are favorable to its replication and propagation and dropping traits that dont, viruses are actively trying to evolve.

    They cannot maintain or "drop" traits, they don't know what is favourable for their replication. Mutations are a mistake of replication, you cannot just change your own DNA. The ones with favourable traits live and the ones without favourable traits die (or don't replicate as fast as the favourable ones and eventually drop out of existence). This happens over and over. No particular virus has any idea what is going on or any control over what trait is passed on or "dropped"

    to be a something thats better at proliferation of itself.

    No it will simply proliferate. A vast majority won't have any genetic change, it happens randomly due to a failure in (imperfect) replication.



    NO, your anal-logy is flawed.

    No it isn't, your understanding of it is just trash.

    you did not account for the PURPOSE its AI codes were written.


    The AI isn't pre coded, it is built gradually from differential replication based on some success criteria. The AI is represented by the neural network at the top corner, it starts untrained by default and only has a general structure to accommodate the simulation. And that's it. That's literally the point of the video.

    The function of the cars is randomly generated, the selection is based solely on progress down the track. There is no top-down "intent" by the program nor the AI (which is not the whole system, it is the neural net you see at the top corner of the screen) to do anything. There is just a simple set of rules and variation.

    if what happened with that AI car was the result of random strings of letters and numbers
    then ok, fine. but it is not.

    Except it is. The only variation that happens is random, and based entirely on the environment and that random variation, it can build up a car that can navigate the track. That's why the neural net at the top develops. There is no programmatic difference between the start and end state, the only difference is that the variation is stored in the network and used to seed the next generation.

    its AI codes were written specifically with the purpose of thriving in its environemt, by keeping acts that let them thrive in their new environemnt and dropping acts that dont.

    No it is not: a vast majority of the cars don't get to replicate or thrive. Just whichever one makes it furthest along the track.

    its not the environment that help it evolve, its the AI code. thats what selection is all about and where iy begins.

    No it is not. QED.
  16. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny no, you explained what they do, not the functions of their doings.

    I already explained how they differ functionally. RNA pairs A to U rather than T.
  17. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    a nail doesnt replicate itself or try to evolve to rust faster with less oxygen.

    Exactly. RNA doesn't "try to evolve" or "try" to replicate either. In fact nothing "tries to evolve" (except I guess humans who want to do gene modification.) Your baby will have random variations on your and the mother's DNA, and if they confer an advantage to it over the level of the rest of the population, then it will be better adapted. If not, and it has some terrible genetic disease, then it won't.

    It just breaks apart which causes it to do the same process again, which can vary. If that doesn't happen, it doesn't replicate.

    It would be no different than if there was some form of seed crystal that broke in half randomly every time it reached a critical size, then the halves filled in their missing sides with more salt or whatever.

    no, the fact that viruses can evolve to be more infectious and jump across specieses of different organism is proof that they can proactively change themselves to reproduce better and to thrive.

    Nope. None of this is done with intention.

    Viruses simply spread wherever they are guided by environmental conditions. The fact that an adaptation takes place is a matter of chance because it is the one that works (results in replication).

    You are thinking of some top-down direction rather than the actual bottom-up "sifting" that takes place in evolution.

    For a simple demonstration of this idea, take a look at this video where deep learning is used to train an AI car to solve a track. Each car is spawned with random variations, and the ones that get furthest are selected to replicate and vary upon.



    In this video the "selection mechanism" (that chooses which car is replicated) is the condition of getting furthest down the track.

    Simply by having a selection factor for the environment and heritable variance, the environment can shape a car that can navigate that track.

    But if the track is different, a different "family tree" will form because the cars really have no control over their environment and different ones will "die" and "spawn". And that will be a matter of pruning different branches of the "tree", not because the "tree" or any particular car has any agency.

    they adapt to their environmemts.

    No "they" individually don't. Their species adapts because of differential replication.

    environmemt cant make rocks and pakis evolve.

    Depends on the environment.
  18. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL An then atheists will insist a process that advanced and remarkable could just occur all by itself.

    Why not? You can reductively understand every part of the process and see how it is physically possible without any interference. Then factor in the fact that the times when it didn't work well just do not continue to exist.

    That's why we currently see the times when it did work continuing to exist.

    It really is that simple.
  19. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Greek Style Doesn't DNA encode RNA and occasionally vice versa?

    Read what I wrote.
  20. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny so how are they different functionally ?

    I just explained that.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 178
  6. 179
  7. 180
  8. 181
  9. 182
  10. 183
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top