User Controls
Posts by ORACLE
-
2020-07-10 at 3:32 AM UTC in Most hated poster on NIS (eternal edition)Marginally less retarded* Wariat
-
2020-07-10 at 3:31 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
-
2020-07-10 at 3:29 AM UTC in Most hated poster on NIS (eternal edition)
-
2020-07-10 at 3:27 AM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
Originally posted by Narc The global warming alarmists have been doing that for decades now.
and as with masks, I still ain't walking round in public looking a cunt by wearing a fucking surgical mask. I'll take my chances with the virus, prolly gonna catch it sometime anyway. Just fingers crossed they got a respirator for me if I'm needing one.
.
Surgical mask use isn't to stop acquiring the virus, it is so you don't spread it if you are an asymptomatic carrier.
Originally posted by Narc Altho I guess its not a bad thing that you can now spot the biggest pussies in the street at a glance.
.
You're literally the biggest pussy: you are disregarding a public health concern that requires only a tiny inconvenience to manage because you are piss scared of... What other people think of you or some shit. -
2020-07-10 at 3:09 AM UTC in Interview with Well HungActual video of WellGay:
-
2020-07-10 at 3:02 AM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
-
2020-07-10 at 3:02 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus editionI hereby dub this shitty movie: Joaquer
-
2020-07-10 at 2:22 AM UTC in How are you feeling at the moment..
-
2020-07-10 at 2:21 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
Originally posted by mmQ Multiverse more like FAGGOT.
I bet if the Joker was confronted IRL by me he would cower behind a garbage can and I'd say "yeah that's right, stay there that's where you belong." And he would apologize a bunch and I'd walk away but not before throwing a banana peel at his stupid painted face.
Yeah in Joker he is just some faggot pussy who went nuts. Whereas for example in Mask of the Phantasm, he literally 1v1s Batman through trickery and martial arts, plus shit loads of planning.
What a cuck. -
2020-07-10 at 2:10 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
-
2020-07-10 at 2:09 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus editionThe only actual good part of the movie was Joachim Phineas's acting. It's unfortunate he was working with a shitty ass script written by a 12 year old. Joker sucks.
Joker. Fucking. SUCKS.
Literally no reason for it to exist in the Batman universe. -
2020-07-10 at 2:05 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
-
2020-07-10 at 2:05 AM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
-
2020-07-10 at 1:17 AM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
Originally posted by Obbe When did I say I didn't like the answer? Maybe I cannot comprehend your answer, or maybe your answer is just a bunch of babbling bullshit. I said "yes or no is sufficient" so that you wouldn't overcomplicate your answer, of course you had to anyways because you know there is no discrete distinction between the two, it's just a declaration.
I'm pretty sure you have no idea what "semantic" means. -
2020-07-10 at 1:14 AM UTC in How are you feeling at the moment..
-
2020-07-10 at 1:13 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
-
2020-07-10 at 12:15 AM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
Originally posted by Obbe Ok, so despite no clear point where a line can be drawn
Important correctionyou are saying decisions made by the environment and decisions made by an individual are clearly two distinct things. All I am asking is how you have made this distinction.
Kindly learn to read, as I have already answered your question several times in language that is accessible at a low reading level.
The distinction is made exactly how the difference between "red" and "orange" is: there is no hard technical, ontological distinction, they are convenient ways to refer to different ranges of the spectrum that differ in a range of ways. That doesn't mean red and orange aren't appreciably different hues and the difference between them is "semantic".
There is just some element in "the world", you model it as a continuous system whenever it is sufficiently defined with some "inside" (the "individual") and some "outside" (the "environment"). It is like asking what separates distinguishes a "car" from the environment, when it is made up of pieces of "the environment" doing different things.
From a thermodynamic perspective it could be "a system that maintains non equilibrium steady state". But there's no hard line to be drawn, similar to how there is no well defined point where the ancestor of the chicken became a chicken. It's just a matter of declaration. That doesn't mean the distinction is "semantic". It's just not discrete.It's really not that complicated of a question, I don't understand why you are avoiding a straight answer, maybe you just don't know.
I have answered you several times in detail, just because you don't like the answer or cannot comprehend written text properly doesn't change anything. -
2020-07-09 at 9:45 PM UTC in Who on NIS is a virgin?
-
2020-07-09 at 9:45 PM UTC in Who on NIS is a virgin?Only virgins and cucks have sex.
-
2020-07-09 at 9:38 PM UTC in Yes psychos, all the ¡Science! shows masks do help stop viruses
Originally posted by Obbe We do make a distinction between a human and an ancestor fish, which is why we call a human a human and a fish a fish.
If there is no such distinction between the environment making a decision and an individual making a decision, no point where we can draw that line, then why have you drawn a line?
athletic abilities failure. Try again.
We make the distinction between a human vs some completely different ancestor of a human (some fish creature millions of years ago) despite there being no single point where it ceased to be a fish or where some monkey ancestor becomes a man. Because they are clearly two distinct things that are bridged by a series of small changes rather than some hard transition point.
That's literally the point. We make the distinction without there being any single location to draw a dividing line.
The same way you distinguish red from blue, but there is no point on the colour spectrum where there is a hard transition. We just demarcate the median of any identifiable colour and say "yep that's red" or "yep that's orange", then it is just shades of red and orange in between.
