User Controls
Posts by Common De-mominator
-
2019-07-16 at 8:51 PM UTC in Nicknames for my new catLarbage
-
2019-07-16 at 8:48 PM UTC in Nicknames for my new cat
-
2019-07-16 at 8:38 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
Originally posted by GGG I also don't sleep with them, so it doesn't matter. I don't feel a need to 'figure it out'.
What matters is when they try to push their delusions onto others. Like Ghost does.
HTS is a good boy and doesn't do those things because he knows he's not a woman. He's a dude who got his balls chopped off and takes drugs that make you grow tits.
Are fat people women now too because they have tits? What about eunuchs? This way of thinking has no basis in reality or science.
It doesn't matter if you want to sleep with them, that's literally what the Bayesian of your brain is. Women are people who fulfill the societal role of a woman. That's usually correlated with females but it's hard to define because the edges are always fizzy, including basic stuff like "pink is for girls, blue is for boys". However we can definitely eliminate some of the factors that are claimed to exclude trans people from womanhood.
For example
- Reproductive viability: there are many women who are sterile.
- Sex organs: there are many women born with a defect unrelated to their sex that malforms their organs. Btw anatomically your dick is a pussy.
- Chromosomes: I literally don't even know my girlfriend's chromosomes. I have a pretty good guess but I've never checked. Regardless there are intersex WOMEN that have an XY chromosome but are anatomically identical to YY women and literally don't even know they are intersex until later in life when a doctor tells them.
All of gender is pretty much of the same type as "boys like blue and girls like pink", it is descriptive rather than prescriptive and it is nonessential, there is no defining essence of womanhood, including your genitals or your chromosomes. If your retort is "well males who like pink are just MEN who happen to like pink, they're still men", consider what happens when someone is literally categorically identical to the possible standards by which someone is identified as a "woman" (i.e. not the bad essentialist refrains I just disproved above), then what exactly the fuck are uou talking about when you say someone is a "man who [is in every meaningful way like a woman]"? What is the label man describing about them at that point? And vice versa. -
2019-07-16 at 12:41 PM UTC in Nicknames for my new cat
-
2019-07-16 at 12:32 PM UTC in Do you guys think a good strategy to get into a 16 yo’s pants
-
2019-07-16 at 12:30 PM UTC in Nicknames for my new catSpookémon
Spookmin
Spoopmun
Mr Pazuzu
Net Dog -
2019-07-16 at 10:52 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
-
Oh wow a female character. I guess thats cool and all but she seems a little over powered. I mean why do the sjws have to force their agenda into film and gaming. Also i feel like the only reason she black is to virtue signal. It's not very realistic for a black woman to engage in medieval combat.
-
2019-07-16 at 10:42 AM UTC in A good sex offender strategyI will kill you as a sex defender
-
2019-07-16 at 10:20 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro EditionThey should make a crack vape
-
2019-07-16 at 10:19 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro EditionWtf is a chore boy
-
2019-07-16 at 10 AM UTC in CandyRein is a nigger
-
2019-07-16 at 9:26 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro EditionWhat can be done is... Parents need to talk to their children and not let internet retard jerkrooms raise them for them.
Failing that, the actual fucking adults who use these sites but have the mental maturity of a 12 year old and encourage/perpetuate/exploit the absolute worst fucking aspects of the human condition through peer pressure to be edgy. It's a sad circle of sad faggota being sad. -
2019-07-16 at 8:15 AM UTC in Are we insane?No, we just lack conviction
-
2019-07-16 at 7:20 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro EditionGuarantee these nerds don't even know how chromosomes work or what the fuck a chromosome even is, just vaguely what they've heard in cartoons or some youtube nigger's plea for adrev
-
2019-07-16 at 7:18 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
Originally posted by aldra that part actually makes sense, there are masculine females and feminent males.
what doesn't make sense to me is why people want to or should be able to force others to identify them based on gender considering it's significantly less important than biological sex
The only real positive argument that's even needed is "why not", specially by showing that the arguments against identifying trans people as they want are clearly arguments from hunger, i.e. made up from the necessity of not wanting to relinquish a particular viewpoint.
You have never looked at someone's cock nor conducted a DNA test on them before calling them a woman or a man. It's simply a lie to say that the biological sex is the important thing to your identification, it's brutally obvious the identification is a social operation.
It is simply a bad faith argument to crumple back to, because people are literally lying about using biological sex like they do it every day when it is in fact fucking bullshit pulled straight out of their asshole. -
2019-07-16 at 7 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
Originally posted by Solstice https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex-determination_system
Whats the point of the deluded gender debate if they haven't found a way to alter your chromosomes yet? It seems like pretty basic science to me. You're either one or the other, I don't get all the so called "confusion".
I guarantee you've never once in your life used a chromosomal test on anyone to tell anything about anyone. All you have ever done is presume that people who you think look like yourcsocially informed archetype of someone with an XX pair. Your chromosomes obviously have literally nothing to do with it, aside from being the excuse you use to rationalize your held view.
Originally posted by GGG "That's sex, gender is different. It's a social construct."
You're saying that as if it ain't true, and it is. Because you've never once used information about anyone's chromosomes, ever, in, making your social considerations. Maybe you think you do but that's just pure self delusion.
What you actually see is a pair of titties etc that flips your Bayesian towards "I want to fuck this". And that is 100% social, because of how your "deep learning" system was trained in the first place was with hundreds of thousands of examples... But you've never once checked anybody's chromosomes themselves. -
2019-07-16 at 1:57 AM UTC in Right-wing religious nuts are the biggest hypocrites in America
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 I quoted scientific facts. Nothing I added to my last post had anything to do with God.
So, if you think believing in both God and Science is being "brainwashed, " then who do you find credible as a reliable source?
Because in the combination of God and Science, you must include Ancient Greek Philosophy, Egyptian Philosophy, Eastern Philosophies of the Asian Peoples and then you cannot bring any of it together without including sociology structuralism.
From your posts, I gather you gain your knowledge from shoving your head up your rectum until you can no longer fight for air!!
-
2019-07-16 at 1:55 AM UTC in What are you listening to right now, space nigga?
-
2019-07-16 at 1:55 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro EditionUnironically one of my favourite songs< including for the gym
