User Controls
Posts by vindicktive vinny
-
2021-01-11 at 3:23 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Yeah duh…versus what? Antelopes making it illegal?
Society is run by the majority or the strongest…what they say goes in their society…or you can leave be punished, it's a simple enough principle to understand.
Example:
If you owned a house and had 3 people living in it and 1 of them continually kept smearing human feces on the walls…you'd likely tell them to stop. If they didn't stop and said "It's my right to smear shit on the wall"…you'd likely beat their ass and kick them out, or just kick them out.
Society works the same way. If you want to live in Society or use societies properties and infrastructure…you have to abide by whatever society tells you is ok and isn't ok….or leave and start your own.
Smearing shit on the walls of society isn't starting your own.
old british man thinks jackass dorsey, tim crook, mark jookerberg, jeff jéwzoo, bill "pizza" gates are the representatives of the majority.
he thinks they are one of him.
-
2021-01-11 at 3:18 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
-
2021-01-11 at 3:10 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
-
2021-01-11 at 3:08 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
-
2021-01-11 at 3:04 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
Originally posted by aldra https://niggasin.space/thread/62830?p=1#post-1274873
im sorry aldra but thats not the right way to look at it.
its not really the government that enabled their absolute monopoly in the tech space, its their operatives that they manage to slip into every pivot and every fulcrum of the levers of power that are.
when elected reps choose to stop representing the interests of their electorates and start representing the interests of the lobby groups that funded their rise to power, they cease to be government officials and became manors. -
2021-01-11 at 2:30 PM UTC in imagine if your phone became a brick
Originally posted by G Freedom of Speech is about citizens not being silenced by government. It has absolutely nothing to do with private businesses enforcing the Terms of Use that everyone agrees to when joining a site.
then why cant these private businesses host or allow harmless freedom pornographies (preteen hardcore child pornographies) to be hosted on their properties and/or services ?
remember also once upon a time in america busses, dinners, shops etc etc ... ie, private businesses used to refuse serving niggers and disallow niggers in their premises until an upitty niggress put a stop to that.
yes, private businesses are free to set the terms and conditions of their services and decide who they choose to serve, but those terms and conditions and rules must be in line with the wellbeing amd contribute to the greater good of the society they profit off from.
otherwise these private businesses are just parasitic rackets, and the society should amend laws to criminalize these private businesses. just as they do with drug cartels and for-profit freedom pornography rings. -
2021-01-10 at 11:28 PM UTC in Decentralization, P2P, Federation, Blockchain and other stuff
Originally posted by Kev lol, its not so much the porn aspect but the fact that nothing is pursued so vigorously by the government. the true test of any secure network is how fast CP will disappear upon being posted. when dissidents in despotic countries (or just simple copyright pirates) notice its secure enough to host CP, they know they can do their thang and undermine their governments, and that they will always be the second to be targeted at best. as soon as the CP starts disappearing, they have a head start to move onto a better network.
but "freedom porn" lmao, next youll be telling me about "freedom fries"
oh wait.
in the same way pedos are the true freedom fighters.
if they can round up and persecute pedos, then they can do the same to any person for any reason the powers that be fancy. -
2021-01-10 at 11:25 PM UTC in Decentralization, P2P, Federation, Blockchain and other stuff
Originally posted by Lanny Well again, look at DHTs. It’s not “a million nodes controlled by a few”, every node can bring another host onto the network, there need not be any privileged or controlling nodes. There is a number of nodes that can fail in order to partition the network, but no number less than the number of participants in the network that can fail to cause the full network to fail.
what if they ban the protocol ? -
2021-01-10 at 11:22 PM UTC in Thumb Drive Appreciation Threadi was expecting this type of thumb drive
-
2021-01-10 at 11:15 PM UTC in Infinityshock Is the Most Hilarious, Original, and Inventive Poster on NIS
-
2021-01-10 at 4:18 PM UTC in Decentralization, P2P, Federation, Blockchain and other stuff
Originally posted by Kev Ah but child pornography is the "canary in the coal mine" of true freedom. When child porn exists on a network and cant be taken down, it proves you are safe there. If the child pornography disappears, then you should too. Wherever the American government succeeds in suppressing child pornography, you are next for whatever reason in your country. Child pornography is the vanguard of revolution.
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY = FREEDOM
from now on child pornography will be known as Freedom Porn.
si. -
2021-01-10 at 4:17 PM UTC in Decentralization, P2P, Federation, Blockchain and other stuff
Originally posted by Lanny DHTs solved distributed addressing/resource location well before blockchain was ever a thing. There remain logistical issues of course, actually inducing nodes to a DHT requires knowing at least one other node. So like if you're building a bittorrent client you need to distribute your software with a list of known induction nodes, or provide a mechanism for finding induction nodes (which usually means a server that hands out addresses) so there is always going to be a finite number of failures which will render a given potential node unable to join the network. But that doesn't mean there's a single point of failure. It means depending on how the logistics of induction is handled there are between 1 and n nodes that need to fail to make non-nodes using _that specific induction strategy_ unable to join a network, but that's a very different thing from a single point of failure.
multiple points of failure then. -
2021-01-10 at 3:57 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
-
2021-01-10 at 3:55 PM UTC in lol the first time since 1814 has the u.sl capital been invaded in a coup attempt
-
2021-01-10 at 3:51 PM UTC in What the hell happened to Speedy Parker?
-
2021-01-10 at 3:50 PM UTC in Parler shitcanned off AWS
-
2021-01-10 at 3:49 PM UTC in Invest in XRP now (ripple)
-
2021-01-10 at 3:46 PM UTC in is roshambo dead
-
2021-01-10 at 2:54 PM UTC in is roshambo dead
-
2021-01-10 at 2:52 PM UTC in Burger King Has a New Logo
