Originally posted by iam_asiam68
what is this issue with attitude and thinking that someone with attitude must be a queer?
Projecting much?
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
it's too bad this wasn't the early 1980's when A.I.D.S. first hit the American Scene. This site and the majority of you QUEERS would already be dead!!
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
if God says you faggots and lesbians DESERVE DEATH, then don't expect me to be nice to you!!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Fox
It’s always funny whenever a troll who goes around acting all tuff and badass all the time gets on here and posts actual IRL details about their sad, pathetic life and you really get to see just how tiny and insignificant and how much of a failure they actually are.
Sploo did this a lot, so did Infinityshock sometimes, like that time he posted a really long thread about cussing out his boss and getting fired from his menial job. Wait is OP infinityshock lol
Actually Iam is a big strong guy. He also owns a very large ranch, and is highly specialized in his field. He does have to watch his anger at times, but we also have to consider where people come from. Where he’s from this isn’t that unusual.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
but in reality, the moment he refused to accept responsibility for his wrongdoing was the point i was ready to jack stomp him. he could have said anything because i was looking for "my bad," not go fuck myself in the terms he chose to use.
I get it, trust me, I used to lose my temper easily, I probably still do, at times (yeah I do). We have to realize this about ourselves and try to correct it. Going about it another way may have given you the outcome you wanted. Ya know, the means to the end.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
…which confuses me even more, because a snowflake is typically a Democrat. and Democrats are supposedly acceptive of all things. and yet, they are hammering others on attitude and then classifying them as homosexuals.
That's perfectly normal for Democrats. They're hypocrites by nature.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Democrats acceptive of all things? Give me a break. They're accepting of all perverted lifestyle choices yes. But when it comes to somebody peacefully smoking a cigarette or owning a certain gun they got apeshit crazy.
Attitude is part personality. If attitude in this sense means standing up for yourself it is by no means a negative trait.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
ok, i will say it like this.
i am guilty of bashing LBG&T people i am guilty of bashing racially different than myself people. i am guilty of bashing mentally ill people. hell, i am just guilty and i know it.
but none of those people did i ever bash them over attitude, but what/who they are.
so, this attitude thing is mind boggling to me. i had no idea that standing up for myself or for another was attitude to begin with, let alone, it is supposed to define you into some category.
when did this new kind of thinking begin?
who came up with this bullshit?
what kind of mind fuck is this?
Sounds eerily like some snowflake shit to me bro.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Technologist
Honey, I’m just talking about the way he keeps telling different stories about why they assassinated this guy. He keeps pushing it out there because he has to change his story. I’m speaking on words that I have seen and heard trump say. No fake news there.
Kinda hate'n the player for "playing" a "DemoCRAP" game
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson
It's amusing how the idiots are harping on about the Iranian dude…they had the chance to kill Bin Laden 9 months before 9/11 but didn't because of the collateral damage possibilities…20/20 etc, isn't the case in this case.
Soleofmyshoe had a 20yr history of murder.
It's also amusing to think sharing the intelligence you have with the general public is a good idea.
ikr.
i didn't see all the Democraps bitching about us/(Obama & Killary) "SNEAKING" in to kill ol BinnyBoy Laden... & in front of his family no less...
What HypoCRAPs 😑
morning Teehee 😍
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
It's amusing how the idiots are harping on about the Iranian dude...they had the chance to kill Bin Laden 9 months before 9/11 but didn't because of the collateral damage possibilities...20/20 etc, isn't the case in this case.
Soleofmyshoe had a 20yr history of murder.
It's also amusing to think sharing the intelligence you have with the general public is a good idea.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God
SCIENTISTS have ‘confirmed’ the existence of God after proving a mathematician’s theory which suggests that there is a higher power.
By SEAN MARTIN PUBLISHED: 05:00, Mon, Jan 23, 2017 | UPDATED: 12:05, Mon, Jan 23, 2017
Renowned physicist finds PROOF of God Or as Dr Gödel put it through his equations: “Ax. 1. {P(φ)∧◻∀x[φ(x)→ψ(x)]} →P(ψ)Ax. 2.P(¬φ)↔¬P(φ)Th. 1.P(φ)→◊∃x[φ(x)]Df. 1.G(x)⟺∀φ[P(φ)→φ(x)]Ax. 3.P(G)Th. 2.◊∃xG(x)Df. 2.φ ess x⟺φ(x)∧∀ψ{ψ(x)→◻∀y[φ(y)→ψ(y)]}Ax. 4.P(φ)→◻P(φ)Th. 3.G(x)→G ess xDf. 3.E(x)⟺∀φ[φ ess x→◻∃yφ(y)]Ax. 5.P(E)Th. 4.◻∃xG(x)”.
You get it, right?
Christoph Benzmüller of Berlin's Free University, who ran the calculations along with Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo of the Technical University in Vienna, told Spiegel Online: "It's totally amazing that from this argument led by Gödel, all this stuff can be proven automatically in a few seconds or even less on a standard notebook.
“I didn’t know it would create such a huge public interest but [Gödel’s ontological proof] was definitely a better example than something inaccessible in mathematics or artificial intelligence…
“It’s a very small, crisp thing, because we are just dealing with six axioms in a little theorem.
“There might be other things that use similar logic.”
Gotdamn Iam is the best poster here.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
