User Controls
Posts by iam_asiam68
-
2019-07-17 at 4:04 PM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Here is the missing link.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PXOghvzbDwde/
You aren't very bright. The Garden of Eden has not existed since the evacuation. They can look forever and never find it. Ironically though, the Rivers listed than ran near it still do exist to this very day. -
2019-07-17 at 3:51 PM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?No one has ever been able to provide the missing links. It's why they settled on the Theory of Randomness. It's a load of crap, but still interesting how many buy it so they don't have to believe in a Deity.
-
2019-07-17 at 3:42 PM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
-
2019-07-17 at 3:39 PM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION:
One must always remember the SOURCE by which they put their faith in comes from.
To those who believe in Evolution, their source comes to them in the FORMAT of SEVERAL SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESSES:
CHARLES DARWIN // AGORAPHOBIA
Scholars still debate just exactly what problems Darwin suffered from, but whatever they were, they were serious. Despite his famed five year voyage on the Beagle (and the publication it led to) making his career, Darwin was virtually incapacitated the entire time. While he concentrated on his physical symptoms as the cause of all his suffering, the constant trembling, nausea, hysterical crying, and visual hallucinations (among other things) seem to have been mostly caused by a severe case of agoraphobia that kept him virtually bedridden from the time he turned 30. In at least one letter he mentions feeling like committing suicide due to the publication of On the Origin of Species, the controversy over which caused him much distress. He may have also suffered from OCD and hypochondria, as he kept meticulous records of every new or recurring symptom.
Darwin suffered from CRYING OUTBURSTS, VISUAL HALLUCINATIONS, felt like COMMITTING SUICIDE, DEPRESSION, OCD, HYPOCHONDRIA.
^
And people follow Darwin's work like it was Gospel when he was literally a BASKET CASE full of several forms of MENTAL ILLNESSES!!
Morons!! -
2019-07-17 at 2:34 PM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by Firekrochfatty oh, the irony!! 😉
only difference…,
My being pathetic is subjective. however,,,,,,
Ya, can't change a turd from being anything but a straight-up fricken piece a shit-turd!
So, you can.. go ahead, And "describe" away!! ya don't/won't bother me, none.. 👍🏻🤣
Turd.
* i'll see what cha got/ come up with.. when i get back from my run.😘
You have serious mental issues. Find the tallest building near yourself and do the world a favor and jump off of it. -
2019-07-17 at 5:30 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
-
2019-07-17 at 5:28 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by Firekrochfatty c'mon, now, TURD ^ are those really the best insults you could come up with?
"running my mouf, delusional, and mentally handicapped?" bahahaha–
WEAK.
I wasn't insulting you, I was merely describing you. Pathetic never has to be properly defined, it just is. Kind of Like You :) -
2019-07-17 at 4:12 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by Firekrochfatty better yet, c'mere and let me take a dump on your face– chit's on you, faggot, cuz i just had a picture up yesterday… so, now, what you got to say? ya ugly turd!! 😂
I don't care if you had one up for years, you currently don't have one up while running your mouth like you have a clue. What are you, Delusional and Mentally handicapped? -
2019-07-17 at 3:45 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
Originally posted by CASPER Not to shit on anyone else's thread, but seemed appropriate
In his honor, please observe a moment of silence before you bang the goofball into your dick vein.
As promised, heres the report and a couple of the emails he sent a couple years back, with what ended up being his real name.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1O3Cg7h_impycjD9e7gCvgjbetFH0_EhL?usp=sharing
RIP Justin Alexis Hernandez aka Malice aka Catfucker (April 16th, 1990- June 15th, 2018)
I have no idea who this Justin/Malice person was. But I do find it interesting if this post is 100% factual since no one within the first few pages even seemed to have any remorse. That's probably a good indicator that the majority of those who post on this site will die all alone hahahahahahahahahahaha -
2019-07-17 at 3:41 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?hahahaha
-
2019-07-17 at 3:38 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?Being judged by a faceless troll off the internet is like a gerbil stuck in Shrooms ass fighting for air!!
-
2019-07-17 at 3:25 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by gadzooks I guess that's kind of interesting, but not really relevant at all to the question of Intelligent Design vs any other theory.
Chemists, for example, aren't really in an academic position to be making factual claims about the existence of God and/or gods. The same applies to biologists and even physicists to a degree. Theological explanations regarding scientific origins are not necessary to explain the majority of scientific theories.
I get what you are stating. It's amazing just how many within science are believers in God, though. And obviously, 51% is the majority. I would bet it could be higher but some probably denied their beliefs due to what area of research they are involved with.
And any time you have Scientists claiming and living their lives as though God exists and is on a personal level to them, you are going to get a bigger push for the "Intelligent Design Theory." Especially when you take into consideration what the Pew Research Poll reveals (51% of Scientists believe in God)!! -
2019-07-17 at 2:26 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by gadzooks So this dude believes in God… I mean, that doesn't really affect anything. His theological beliefs don't represent those of all genetic scientists, nor do the beliefs of any of these scientists have any bearing on truths beyond the scope of what they're studying.
It does match the Pew Research Poll findings:
The Pew Research Center poll of scientists also found that levels of religious faith vary according to scientific specialty and age. For instance, chemists are more likely to believe in God (41%) than those who work in the other major scientific fields. Meanwhile, younger scientists (ages 18-34) are more likely to believe in God or a higher power than those who are older.
According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power. -
2019-07-17 at 2:15 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by gadzooks You're kinda going off into some strange tangents in your previous reply, but to start with I'll address the following…
This analogy you're referring to is only meant to explain how DNA works, not delve into any speculation beyond simple transcription/translation and the production of proteins in biological systems.
Anything else abstracted from this analogy is not treating the analogy in good faith.
The evolutionary origins of the particular strands of DNA we see today is the scope of an entirely different field.
OK, I will add another comment from this same Dr so you can see as a Scientist, he does not believe in Evolution.
Dr. Francis Collins, director of the Human Genome Project, followed Clinton to the podium stating, "It is humbling for me and awe inspiring to realize that we have caught the first glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God."8 -
2019-07-17 at 2 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
-
2019-07-17 at 1:58 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by gadzooks Do you happen to have a source on that?
The thing is, this doesn't seem self-evident.
As long as the information "evolves" in its complexity over time, then you can trace a path from extraordinarily simple information in nature (such as oscillations of micro and macro phenomena giving off waves - manifesting, for example, as the patterns of the tides we see as a result of the motions of the moon), to much more complex examples.
When you factor in the billions of years of time, and the enormous number of potential permutations that can arise during this time, it becomes pretty reasonable to expect much more complex information like we see in DNA/RNA.
Even IF Watson or Crick or whomever said this, it can easily represent an example of the appeal to authority fallacy. Stating an opinion like that goes beyond the scope of explaining the structure and function of DNA.
All of your answers can be found by the man in charge of Mapping the DNA Genetic Code:
Dr. Francis Collins, director of the Human Genome Project (that mapped the human DNA structure) said that one can "think of DNA as an instructional script, a software program, sitting in the nucleus of the cell."5 -
2019-07-17 at 1:55 AM UTC in What do you think is beyond the universe?
Originally posted by gadzooks Okay, hold up a minute here, you've given me a lot to unpack here.
If I'm parsing everything here correctly (and let me know if I'm not), you're delineating a sort of history of paradigm shifts in all the physical and biological sciences, where we originally saw things in terms of a singularity of all physical phenomena, and then everything was based on the concept of randomness, and so on.
But in the end you conclude that Intelligent Design automatically logically follows as the most correct theory to explain everything.
The thing is, without even getting into the potential flaws in any foundations for an Intelligent Design type theory (such as proving that an intelligent designer actually exists, where they came from, etc), I still don't see any reasonable justification for preferring I.D. over any other proposed theory like The Big Bang and so forth. The stuff you mention regarding genetic randomization and so on has yet to be effectively disproven. Even if we have not seen any empirical examples of single-celled organisms transmuting into multicellular organisms in a petry dish does not automatically result in the underlying theory being wrong. It's been a while since I've done any reading into abiogenesis theory, but if I recall correctly, they were making some solid progress with one experiment (originally developed by Miller and Urey) where they successfully recreated a physical environment mimicking that in which life would have evolved millions of years ago, and they actually observed amino acids forming spontaneously. It might not be multicellular life yet, but it's a start.
And to be honest, I'm not sure I'm up for getting into each and every one of the finer points of either evolution by natural selection or abiogenesis theory.
Suffice it to say that I don't really think you can actually claim that Intelligent Design is any more correct a theory than The Big Bang, or whatever other theory is held to be the most valid in the scientific community at the current moment.
I am not removing the "Bang" from the equation. I accept what Krausse proposed, there was nothing before, no ingredients for a "Soup Theory." It was just nothingness and then from out of nowhere, and no reason, the "Bang" took place. And as result of the "Bang," we have energy, the Laws of Physics, everything we originally thought that caused the "Bang," is obvious was the result from the "Bang!!"
Krausse, Atheist, Theoretical Physicist, now laying the foundation for "Intelligent Design."
Krausse is very much like British philosopher, Dr. Antony Flew, was a leading spokesperson for atheism, actively involved in debate after debate. However, scientific discoveries within the last 30 years brought him to a conclusion he could not avoid. Now is a front runner for Intelligent Design due to information discovered from DNA. Just as former atheist Dr. Antony Flew questioned, it is legitimate to ask oneself regarding this three billion letter code instructing the cell…who wrote this script? Who placed this working code, inside the cell? It must be God!!
Antony Few, former Atheist, now believer God, laying the foundation for "Intelligent Design."
These Atheist, one no longer and the other on the fence, are challenging "Randomness." The "Soup Theory" of how the "Bang" had been originally thought of now has become something intentional that brought forth the ingredients once thought to have been the cause of the "Bang."
And they propose DNA does not follow the structural rules we believe for "Natural Selection," and "Inherited Traits." And DNA defies every proposed idea of "Randomness."
But I do agree, that leaves the ultimate question, "WHO is the Designer?"
Neil Degrasse Tyson, and several others have no issue tossing out the term, "Alien."
But I propose this to Neil and the others, God would be Alien to them. And just because Science cannot find God, is no stretch of the imagination when we consider that Science is only 2,000 years old. There are trillions of things they don't know.
But something else, There are microwave red lines within our current Galaxy that we do not count when applying the 13 Billion year age. If we included those red lines, we would be just about the same as we calculate the age of the Earth, 4.5 Billion years old.
Why does science ignore these immediate red lines since we count the red lines to achieve the 13 Billion age range?
Does Science believe they are more intelligent than us?
We are talking about people who excel in Mathematics due to suffering from a form of Psychological Disorder like Autism. 8 out of every 10 Engineers have been diagnosed with some form of Autism, but they excel in Calculus which is the bases for Quantum Mechanics.
The biggest X-MAN ever, was Darwin himself. His own children describe his bouts he suffered with. At the time they had no idea what it was, but today it's rather obvious of his Mental Disorder.
I just get confused how the masses have allowed people who are diagnosed with even mild forms of Mental Illness, are the ones are looking at these mental midgets for answers.
Science created their own bi-laws, system to format theories, and their own language. None of which are sane!! None of which are relative to even the Human Species. Do you know most comic book creators suffer from general personality Disorders? They cannot envision normal images, but have these vivid demonic images.
I am myself both a Mathematician and Engineer. And these mental midgets weird me out!! -
2019-07-16 at 6:12 PM UTC in Russia meddles in US and European politicsThe best thing about Trump being President, Russia is not interested in attacking us. They might meddle here and there because that is what espionage is all about. And the USA does it as well, just ask Snowden. But as of right now, there are no worries concerning Russia. Now, if Hillbillary was in office, Putin might have already launched. So keeping the LEFT WING NUTJOBS out of control is the best thing for America!!
-
2019-07-16 at 5:49 PM UTC in Do you guys seriously think parks are better than bars
Originally posted by Bill Krozby Idk man some people like getting cucked some people could also spin it the other way and say that you're being stingy with her pussy if you're not letting them do her.
I had a girl ask me a few years back if I would be her boyfriend and if she could have other boyfriends. Just didn't see the point in that. I think theres a level of renn fest folk that try to believe in that.
I had some girl bring me drugs a couple weeks ago and blow me that has a boyfriend she lives with but she's also really shady and probably shouldn't be working with kids lol
I'm a very traditional guy so I just don't see the point in sharing your wife / gf with someone else unless maybe you're a fag and like that.
IDK man the viking would go rape and pillege all the woman no matter what race but when one of them got married they would all screw the bride before he had his honeymoon so he'd end up taking care of another mans child. seems kinda sick to me
Yep, I never saw my friend the same way after that. Too weird of an acceptance for me. I'd rather be alone than have a woman doing that. -
2019-07-16 at 5:05 PM UTC in Do you guys seriously think parks are better than barsIt's weird how some couples are. Let's say that was her man when she grabbed your junk and then you slapped her and he smiled. It does not shock me.
Before you could buy hemp legally, I had a dealer who had a nice looking wife. One day there were about 5 of us there to buy off of him. He rolled 3 doobies, lit one and passed it, lit the other one, and did that till all three were lit. We were pretty stoned by the time we finished them all. Then he said to all of us, my wife wants to give you all head jobs. This kind of worried me. Get me stoned and then tell me your ole lady is going to blow me. Something was very illogical here, in my my mind. But she went to the first guy and blew him, the second, and eventually blew us all including her husband.
The odd thing was, I knew these people for 10 years. And now when I wanted pot, I kind of felt nervous every time I went to buy off of him. I kept him as a supplier because I did know him. But that incident always made me wonder if there would be a time for reckoning hahahahahaha
