User Controls
Posts by iam_asiam68
-
2020-01-19 at 4:11 PM UTC in Looking for Answers!!
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace This is really conflict resolution 101. He just made a big scene in front of everybody and lost his shit. Now everybody thinks both he and that boss are jackasses with short tempers, and will be less likely to come to either of them when something goes wrong.
If you pull them aside or at least calmly explain things, people will respect and like you more for it.
i was there for 1 week. that is how it is done when i am sent to help. so it's a short period and i have to fix the problem within that 1 week. and the employees and i spent the remaining last days working our butts off and i bought them lunches and on friday paid the tab for the beer pounding session we had before saying our goodbyes. -
2020-01-19 at 4:09 PM UTC in Looking for Answers!!
Originally posted by Technologist I understand that, but you know you’re a big guy with an intimidating demeanor. I have to deal with that a lot. I’m a tall, loud voiced person that can come across very intimidating, or so I’m told.
You also know there are PLENTY of people who will not admit they’re wrong, especially when confronted in front of others. He had to assert his manliness.
I’m just brainstorming here, but maybe if you pulled him aside and told him you were the one who made the mistake, not the other guy. He may have received it better.
Also, you say you expected him to apologize, something you or I might do; but we can’t expect anything from anyone.
no, i see your point and cannot argue against it.
i have called idiots faggot before who was being a dumbass.
it was the attitude remark that = a faggot that i did not get.
but in reality, the moment he refused to accept responsibility for his wrongdoing was the point i was ready to jack stomp him. he could have said anything because i was looking for "my bad," not go fuck myself in the terms he chose to use. -
2020-01-19 at 3:58 PM UTC in Looking for Answers!!
Originally posted by Technologist Iam,
I don’t really think he literally meant you were a fag. It was just his way of insulting you back. You just finished saying he needed is ass beat, what do you expect him to say?
How would you react if someone said you were wrong and needed your ass beat?
in my viewpoint, i was an outsider there to help, and i saw a problem and went directly to the source to correct it. honestly, i expected him to apologize to his employee, since i told him he made a mistake and the fault did not fall on his employee. but instead of accepting he was wrong, he chose to act like his shit didn't stink. -
2020-01-19 at 3:53 PM UTC in Looking for Answers!!
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny they mostly are and you just proved him right by getting physical.
non-faggots just laff it off when beimg called a faggot.
interesting, so by the fact i chose to confront him and point out he was wrong was not the trigger point (obviously, i was triggered by what he did to his employee well before his stupidity of trying to break me down to my face)?
to me, him not acknowledging his wrong doing by compounding it with calling me a name was just a green light to whip his ass. -
2020-01-19 at 6:12 AM UTC in Looking for Answers!!i did some searching on google and from what the search engine revealed, i am going with "you have an attitude" is definitely a snowflake term. which confuses me even more, because a snowflake is typically a Democrat. and Democrats are supposedly acceptive of all things. and yet, they are hammering others on attitude and then classifying them as homosexuals.
no wonder i hate Democrats, especially, if they are always trying to mindfuck the average human being.
it's what Roberta does in his "hate/impeach Trump" thread. most of his articles are literally snowflake articles, or, mindfuck articles skewing the truth.
i should had figured the Boss for that other company was a snowflake/democrat. he did not know the facts and just embarrassed his employee when he was innocent. i should have kicked his ass!! -
2020-01-19 at 5:26 AM UTC in Looking for Answers!!i agree, Spectral.
in my profession, because we deal with mathematics, specifically trig and the science of metallurgy, the more we know it seems we have an attitude towards those who do not know as much. but in reality, i always believed it was because they had tremendous confidence in their abilities and their skill level proved it. so when i finally achieved their level, i also knew then that within myself i am/was capable of doing things that others are not and desire to be. but i felt it was confidence in ability and skill, rather than the attitude of i was better than someone else.
i don't know. and i don't want to offend people i work with if they feel i think i am better than them. nor do i want someone to think my confidence is attitude so it must mean i am something i am not.
this is why i claim it to be a mindfuck. because no matter how i view this, to someone viewing it from their perspective, i am either pissing them off or making them think things retardedly. you cannot win in that scenario. -
2020-01-19 at 5:15 AM UTC in Looking for Answers!!ok, i will say it like this.
i am guilty of bashing LBG&T people
i am guilty of bashing racially different than myself people.
i am guilty of bashing mentally ill people.
hell, i am just guilty and i know it.
but none of those people did i ever bash them over attitude, but what/who they are.
so, this attitude thing is mind boggling to me.
i had no idea that standing up for myself or for another was attitude to begin with, let alone, it is supposed to define you into some category.
when did this new kind of thinking begin?
who came up with this bullshit?
what kind of mind fuck is this? -
2020-01-19 at 4:50 AM UTC in Looking for Answers!!
-
2020-01-19 at 4:13 AM UTC in What did Greta mean by this?thanks, was unaware of that.
-
2020-01-19 at 4:12 AM UTC in Looking for Answers!!where i am from, if you are done wrong you get back at em, or get even. for my job, this past week i had to go out of state. and during a situation that took place (the boss screamed at an employee, to which it was not the employees fault, but the employee accepted it like it was his fault). it was actually my fault. and as soon as the boss was finished, i said to him, you just yelled at this person who is innocent without having the facts to know who did it. you need your ass kicked. he said, you have an attitude, you must be a faggot. to which i grabbed him and ran him to the lathe and proceeded to push his face closer to lathe while saying, i'll show you what a faggot looks like after i'm done machining your fucking skull. he literally pissed himself and did not show up the rest of the week.
but here is my question:
what is this issue with attitude and thinking that someone with attitude must be a queer? -
2020-01-19 at 4:03 AM UTC in What did Greta mean by this?
Originally posted by aldra no, it's literally from The Bow and the Club by Julius Evola
I've seen this and some others around, it's amusing how many people assume the quote is legit, probably because they didn't read past the first line
it could be from what you claim, but manifestation/invisible to visible are all known components to the Bible, which is at least 2,000 years older than what you are claiming it's from. either way, she is an idiot for saying what she did. -
2020-01-19 at 4 AM UTC in Lanny Is No Longer With Us
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood You're an idiot if you believe that, it makes no sense. Bioweapon scientists genetically modified the Ebola virus to make HIV-1. They both rely on the same gene sequence to infect humans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPC1
i don't recall posting i believed it, but that it was an interesting view vs what we have been led to believe as fact. -
2020-01-18 at 5:23 PM UTC in Lanny Is No Longer With Usthat's an interesting take on it from the monkey blood to an african male passing aids to a faggot steward on a plane who passed it to other faggots flying and eventually hit the American scene.
-
2020-01-18 at 5:16 PM UTC in What did Greta mean by this?
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
for one, her claims of the invisible manifestations to the visible is straight from the Bible. that is how the incarnation of God is described and how the Holy Spirit works within those who follow and believe in God.
another proof this girl is retarded by tying science, climate control, to the description of God. -
2020-01-18 at 5:13 PM UTC in Lanny Is No Longer With Us
Originally posted by Fox I know lanny in real life from when I lived in San Francisco. We used to hang out at the Academy of Sciences and argue philosophy. We kept in touch since then and I can confirm that this is true. If you would like a link to his memorial Facebook page, PM me and I’ll send it to you. Won’t post it publicly for obvious reasons
it's too bad this wasn't the early 1980's when A.I.D.S. first hit the American Scene. This site and the majority of you QUEERS would already be dead!! -
2020-01-14 at 3:54 AM UTC in Dump idiot Trumpi love how Roberta claims the USA hates Trump:
from the national championship Game between Clemson and LSU:
Trump arrived at the College Football Playoff title game between No. 1 LSU and No. 3 Clemson at the Superdome on Monday with the expectation of a warm welcome. Trump received cheers from the entire fan bases when he was introduced before the national anthem to a standing massive ovation and chants of “U-S-A! U-S-A!” -
2020-01-12 at 5:54 AM UTC in Physical collectionsbeen divorced twice, and somehow i lost my collections both times. i no longer purchase vinyls, 8-tracks, cassette, cd's. i do the digital thing now.
-
2020-01-11 at 8:11 PM UTC in Dump idiot TrumpScientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God
SCIENTISTS have ‘confirmed’ the existence of God after proving a mathematician’s theory which suggests that there is a higher power.
By SEAN MARTIN
PUBLISHED: 05:00, Mon, Jan 23, 2017 | UPDATED: 12:05, Mon, Jan 23, 2017
Renowned physicist finds PROOF of God
Or as Dr Gödel put it through his equations: “Ax. 1. {P(φ)∧◻∀x[φ(x)→ψ(x)]} →P(ψ)Ax. 2.P(¬φ)↔¬P(φ)Th. 1.P(φ)→◊∃x[φ(x)]Df. 1.G(x)⟺∀φ[P(φ)→φ(x)]Ax. 3.P(G)Th. 2.◊∃xG(x)Df. 2.φ ess x⟺φ(x)∧∀ψ{ψ(x)→◻∀y[φ(y)→ψ(y)]}Ax. 4.P(φ)→◻P(φ)Th. 3.G(x)→G ess xDf. 3.E(x)⟺∀φ[φ ess x→◻∃yφ(y)]Ax. 5.P(E)Th. 4.◻∃xG(x)”.
You get it, right?
Christoph Benzmüller of Berlin's Free University, who ran the calculations along with Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo of the Technical University in Vienna, told Spiegel Online: "It's totally amazing that from this argument led by Gödel, all this stuff can be proven automatically in a few seconds or even less on a standard notebook.
“I didn’t know it would create such a huge public interest but [Gödel’s ontological proof] was definitely a better example than something inaccessible in mathematics or artificial intelligence…
“It’s a very small, crisp thing, because we are just dealing with six axioms in a little theorem.
“There might be other things that use similar logic.” -
2020-01-11 at 7:53 PM UTC in Dump idiot Trump
-
2020-01-11 at 6:10 PM UTC in Dump idiot Trump9The Computer Scientists Who Allegedly Proved God Exists (2013)
In October 2013, two scientists, Christoph Benzmüller of Berlin's Free University and his colleague, Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo of the Technical University in Vienna, formalized a theorem regarding the existence of God that was penned by the Austrian mathematician Kurt Gödel.
Using an ordinary MacBook computer, they have shown that Gödel's proof was correct, at least on a mathematical level, by way of higher modal logic.
In their initial submission on a research server, “Formalization, Mechanization, and Automation of Gödel's Proof of God's Existence,” the pair say that “Goedel's ontological proof has been analysed for the first-time with an unprecedented degree of detail and formality with the help of higher-order theorem provers.”
But unsurprisingly, there is a rather significant caveat to that claim. In fact, what the researchers in question say they have actually proven is a theorem which was put forward by the renowned Gödel, and the real news isn't about a Supreme Being, but rather what can now be achieved in scientific fields using superior technology. The mathematicians say that their proof of Gödel's axioms has more to do with demonstrating how superior technology can help bring about new achievements in science.
Benzmüller and Paleo believe that their work can benefit areas such as artificial intelligence and the verification of software and hardware.
Ultimately, the formalization of Gödel's ontological proof is unlikely to win over many atheists, nor is it likely to comfort true believers who might argue that the idea of a higher power is one that defies logic by definition. Nevertheless, for mathematicians looking for ways to break new ground, maybe the news could represent an answer to their prayers.
Source 1, Source 2
10The Neurologist Who Claimed that Near-Death Experiences Actually Can Happen (2013)
While those lines don't mention accurate statements about the existence of Heaven or Hell, we don't want to miss the opportunity to mention this article about near-death experiences.
A scientific study has revealed that near-death experiences such as seeing a bright light, travelling through a tunnel, or the sensation of leaving your own body are more vivid than any other memory.
According to Dr. Steven Laureys, a Belgian neurologist who heads the Coma Science Group at the university hospital in the city of Liege (Belgium), has spoken to many patients over the years who have awakened from a coma and told him about "journeys" they have been on during the near-death experience.
The team, which was made up of scientists from the Coma Science Group and the University's Cognitive Psychology Research Uni, conducted Memory Characteristics Questionnaires, which test for the sensory and emotional details in recollections. They then compared near-death experiences with other memories of intense real-life events, as well as memories of dreams and thoughts. However, the scientists were surprised to find that near-death experiences were much richer than any imagined or real event, including births and marriages.
On April 10, 2013, Dr. Laureys told CNN that patients in intensive care are often scared to tell their stories of near-death experiences, as they are afraid that people won't take them seriously; but people who go on the journeys can be forever changed, with some no longer fearing death.
The questionnaire asked survivors about how certain they were that a remembered experience was a real event. Dr. Laureys, who believes that the experiences originate in human physiology, said, "They (the patients) are very convinced that it is real."
It has also been discovered that it is enough just to think you're dying to have a memory of a near-death experience.
The study said, "Many individuals having had NDEs were not physically in danger of death suggesting that the perception, on its own, of the risk of death seems to be important in eliciting NDEs."
Laureys doesn't want to speculate on the existence of Heaven or Hell, but he does say that only a small minority of near-death experiences are horrifying. Most of them are pleasant and uplifting. From his accounts, it sounds like more people go to "Heaven" than "Hell."
Source 1, Source 2
