User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Posts by なに?

  1. なに? Yung Blood
    Went to a rave at 17 and took 150mg of pure MDMA. Rolled absolute tits, made out with a woman I didn't even say a single word to, and made an ass out of myself on the dancefloor. I rolled so hard that I got the golden glasses effect when looking at people and also saw light pulsating rainbow auras every time the build ups came in a song. Fucking awesome night. I wish I could experience that roll again because I never got any visual effects again aside from the eye shakes.
  2. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Esplender I have to see that.

    I was at the end of a two day dex bender when I posted that haha. It's definitely not the song it samples but here it is.

  3. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Esplender This is probably the most weeb of all the weeb shit I know


    I have a uk hardcore track that samples this. Always wondered where the nyan nyans came from. Thank you for solving a 7 year long crisis in my life.
  4. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Hikikomori-Yume






    I thought I did a lot of drugs but apparently not enough to have your kind of taste in music.

  5. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Esplender


    These two are fire. Teengenerate is dopeee.
  6. なに? Yung Blood
    Shut up and just post nudes.
  7. なに? Yung Blood


  8. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Hikikomori-Yume also this thread sucks and you all fail at jp-music

    Shut the Fuck up and post something... Bitch.
  9. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Esplender Old swing music is hella dope


    Electro-swing however is retard-tier though.

    New Orleans is dope and you need to go if the haven't been yet.
  10. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Lanny

    This I like. Fuck your noise though. This one is dedicated to Malice.

  11. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker That would be a clueless cluster fuck.

    VODKA FOR ALL
  12. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by 杀死所有的白魔鬼 Only 11% of Americans define themselves as Libertarians. Most of them registered as Democrats.

    They are very clearly not in a place of power.

    Republicans are, and they're fucking up the environment out of GREED. Not any particular political ideology. It is literally just the rich lobbying for policies and politicians that will earn them more money.

    This is why you're wrong. It's from 2013 but demographics don't change that fast.



    And it's not how many registered libertarians there are that are the problem, it's the ideology itself that the Republican Party has adopted. I've said this three times. Stop fucking trolling me.
  13. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by 杀死所有的白魔鬼 Let's rewind



    To be perfectly clear, you were bitching about the LIBERTARIAN PARTY because you think they are the ones fucking shit up?

    Let me ask you, why do you think the Libertarian Party is relevant? Do you think any sort of libertarianism MUST mean government = bad? I mean for real…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Democrat

    ^this is generally what people think of when they think of libertarians in America, because this is the largest group of libertarians in America. Not the Libertarian Party. Not libertarian Republicans.

    I'm talking about liberal libertarianism in general. It's quite clear that the Republican party didn't become as economically libertarian until the ideology was gradually pushed into it in the 80s. Once again, read the book Dark Money.

    Also how unaware are you? The Libertarian Party is more representative of the ideology as whole than any other niche libertarian sect. Most people who claim to be Libertarians support politicians like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson who areeee- members of the Libertarian party. Go through the list of politicians in the Libertarian Democrat page you looked at then look at the Libertarian party page. The numbers alone show the relevancy. The fuck are you smoking? You're disillusioned if you think most libertarians in America would align with anything that had Democrat on the name. Infact, I haven't even heard of Libertarian Democrats until you brought it up.

    You're just wrong on this man.

    As far as relevancy to the environment: Most libertarians support laissez-faire economics and minimal government interference. This ideology has also permeated through to the Republican party over the past thirty years and this is what you're seeing in the GOP today. The Republican party guided by libertarian ideology. And this is exactly what you don't want if you want to solve/prevent ecological disasters that will carry refugee crisis with them.
  14. なに? Yung Blood
    This body wash will change your life.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0009MJE74/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_lI1RAbTKQ6NVA
  15. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Lanny There's no voting going on there. They're just using a blockchain strategy to implement verifiable document history. It's kinda interesting but I don't really see how it's different than publishing bound copies of you legal code or court proceedings. Like let's say a state wants to alter its laws retroactively (e.g. to claim a law making bitcoin illegal was in force several years ago). In the blockchain system anyone who holds a record could identify the alteration as invalid, but then the state could just rewrite the history. You're left with some citizens with one version of the legal code and the state with another. The citizens copies don't count for any more than, say, the bound copies of legal codes american lawyers possess. It's a high tech solution that doesn't seem to solve anything at all.

    And in any case, that's just the legal code. It has nothing to do with voting.

    Fine, just Direct Democracy Communism then.
  16. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by 杀死所有的白魔鬼 Then your use of the word is pretty silly, because left leaning libertarianism (fucking dumb use of the word if you ask me, since you can apply it to so many different aspects as is seen in this discussion) is generally in line with the democratic party.

    You use the word libertarian and then are like "No, no, I'm talking about this other, smaller group of libertarians. Not the ones people usually think of when they think of libertarians in America."

    It's probably better just to say "Republicans." Because most of the people who would identify as libertarians (more correctly, they'd be libertarian socialists) in America most definitely would support fighting global warming. The Libertarian party itself supports protecting the environment, but not through government. Just through holding liable parties liable. They believe this will self-regulate into something beneficial for the environment. Way more on the philosophical side of libertarianism.

    http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Libertarian_Party_Environment.htm

    The Republicans on the other hand have been very actively trying to fuck the environment up as much as they can. I'd say they're ironically MORE libertarian than the Libertarian Party, but it clearly comes from a place of greed and capitalism, and the pushing of ignorance/fear to achieve their goals.

    My use of the word Libertarian? You're breaking my brain right now.

    "The Libertarian Party (LP) is a political party in the United States that promotes civil liberties, non-interventionism, laissez-faire capitalism and the abolition of the welfare state."

    Nothing about this is socialist. Socialism in America can be interpreted as supporting a Keynesian welfare state or the actual use of the word- calling for the abolishment of capital and the installment of a direct democracy institution.

    It also doesn't align with the Democratic party as it the current Democratic party is interventionist (aside from the progressives), believe in regulation on business, and at least claim to support welfare.

    The kicker about libertarians believing that the market will sort out environmental issues is that it has never historically happened and won't. Liberal libertarianism is the ideology of autism that's made to dance from strings pulled by the elite class.

    I don't think you have a good grasp on the history of American political parties or current language. Or you're just purposely trying to spread misinformation. Your right to wrong ratio is about 4:3. Please refer to Wikipedia and a political compass.
  17. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Juicebox I'm sure I'll be fine for the last few years we've got left.

    You planning for nuclear winter or something?
  18. なに? Yung Blood
  19. なに? Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Enter But it'll all fucking change when I get buff and do the tinder thing. THEYRE ALL GOING TO FUCKING PAY (emotionally).

    You think so, but things won't get better until you live and breathe not giving a shit. You have to not care what people think about you and just say and do what you feel but at the same time be socially aware. It takes some nuance. Women can smell if you're uncertain about yourself though. You just have to fake it until you make it.

    Edit: Also everything ching chong said.
  20. なに? Yung Blood
    When I say libertarian I'm talking about American libertarianism. Not the anarchic/communist use of the word (which I do support).

    American (liberal) libertarianism is economically right- believes in getting as close to free market capitalism as possible with minimal intervention from the government on society. On social issues they claim to be left leaning however that is only their claim on the mainstream political spectrum. The alignment on the political spectrum mostly comes down to economics and the role of government (making libertarians further right than Republicans of the past).

    The left (liberals, socialists, etc) want the most government intervention. I don't think the definitions of American politics stuff you're using are accurate.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Jump to Top