User Controls
Posts by the man who put it in my hood
-
2021-07-22 at 7:30 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singlnah i'm just trolling I know you can rape children in Poland
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Actually no, in the countries where you'd be put to death your liberal laws are not recognized…you and your "Transgender" would both be put to death…probably set on fire or something like that while the locals roasted marshmallows
How would they know I did the gay unless they looked at my butthole. By looking at my butthole it would automatically make them homosexuals and they would have to kill themselves on the spot.
They didn't think this out very well. -
2021-07-22 at 7:26 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singlThe EU is a convention of nations and Poland is a member of that convention
-
2021-07-22 at 7:22 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singl
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson You've put your penis in a man's bottom. A crime in some countries that would result in your execution.
Actually transgender women are women so in fact they would have to arrest themselves for doing the homosexual act of looking at my butthole for anal scarring and they would burn in hell for looking at my male anus, faggots
Originally posted by Wariat please tell me or find me what the polish global or overall aoc is with a source to back up your claim.
The EU defines anyone under the age of 18 as a child.CETS201– Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse, 25.X.2007__________________________________________________________________________________3Article 3 – DefinitionsFor the purposes of this Convention:a“child” shall mean any person under the age of 18 years
-
2021-07-22 at 7:12 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singl
Originally posted by Wariat actually she was 16. not 15 but ok. plus 16 is the aoc where ur at. canada.
Not how it works at all. I don't even think you actually know the "age of consent" for your country because every pedophile thinks "age of consent" means ITS LEGAL TO RAPE A GIRL WHEN THEY TURN 13 THE LAW SAYS SO!!!!
those laws are for teenagers, not adults trying to fuck kids. You don't even understand the law it's probably EXTREMELY illegal for you to even be talking to those girls but you think it's okay because you're too stupid to understand the law.
ignorance isn't innocence. Do you see anyone else your age talking to teenage girls? They talk to girls their own age.. "age of consent" doesn't mean you can have sex with underaged girls it's just a term for when a teenager can be in a consensual relationship WITH ANOTHER TEENAGER or young adult, of which you are neither. -
2021-07-22 at 7:07 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singlyou deserve to be publicly shamed and all the parents should show their kids "look there's the pedophile, throw tomatoes at him but DONT GET TOO CLOSE or he will rape you"
CANCEL CULTURE AT ITS FINEST FOLX
-
2021-07-22 at 7:04 PM UTC in Random Thoughts
-
2021-07-22 at 7:03 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singlcreep catchers poland YER DONE BUD GOT THE LOGS THAT GIRL WAS ONLY 15 YA FUCKING NONCE
hurr durr fuys da aoc here is 13
-
2021-07-22 at 6:59 PM UTC in STICK IT, Damn It!
Originally posted by stl1 Just a note: Most things of any value require more than a single word (as most of my posts show).
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20
Since the last revision of this section of the Guidelines, the results of several randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies of ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19 have been published in peer-reviewed journals or have been made available as manuscripts ahead of peer review. Some clinical studies showed no benefits or worsening of disease after ivermectin use,21-24 whereas others reported shorter time to resolution of disease manifestations that were attributed to COVID-19,25-27 greater reduction in inflammatory marker levels,26 shorter time to viral clearance,21 or lower mortality rates in patients who received ivermectin than in patients who received comparator drugs or placebo.21,27
However, most of these studies had incomplete information and significant methodological limitations, which make it difficult to exclude common causes of bias. These limitations include:
The sample size of most of the trials was small.
Various doses and schedules of ivermectin were used.
Some of the randomized controlled trials were open-label studies in which neither the participants nor the investigators were blinded to the treatment arms.
Patients received various concomitant medications (e.g., doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, corticosteroids) in addition to ivermectin or the comparator drug. This confounded the assessment of the efficacy or safety of ivermectin.
The severity of COVID-19 in the study participants was not always well described.
The study outcome measures were not always clearly defined.
that doesn't prove or disprove anything. You aren't a doctor.
Nobody here is a doctor and there is an unlimited amount of studies that disprove each other endlessly because science only gets done when someone pays for it. You are just playing into the agenda.
You know you fucked up when you fall into media conventions PEOPLE ARE ARGUING ABOUT IVERMECTIN SO I MUST ARGUE ABOUT IVERMECTIN IF THEY ARE AGAINST IT THAT MUST MEAN I SHOULD BE FOR IT
This stopped being about science, public health and safety long ago. None of you people give a shit about any of that and are just co-opting this disaster into your political narrative. -
2021-07-22 at 6:48 PM UTC in Chimpanzees are killing gorillas unprovoked for the first time: scientists
-
2021-07-22 at 6:43 PM UTC in STICK IT, Damn It!
-
2021-07-22 at 6:40 PM UTC in What are you doing at the momentall that buckwheat made him weak
-
2021-07-22 at 5:59 PM UTC in Chimpanzees are killing gorillas unprovoked for the first time: scientistsblack on black crime
-
2021-07-22 at 5:58 PM UTC in Luring cops to their doom with calls about someone smoking weeduh huh uh huh
-
2021-07-22 at 5:57 PM UTC in How do you attach a sink to a counter at the bottomNo, still haven't called him i'm too lazy
-
2021-07-22 at 5:57 PM UTC in I hate being oldits summer
-
2021-07-22 at 4:54 PM UTC in Brits experimenting with corona powered aircraft to cause rain in miserable dry arab shitholejust make more water
-
2021-07-22 at 4:47 PM UTC in guys... guys...who?
-
2021-07-22 at 4:39 PM UTC in the benefits and downsides of being singl
-
2021-07-22 at 4:39 PM UTC in I hate being oldi wanna freeze to death
-
2021-07-22 at 4:39 PM UTC in this is so sadI am not into them. most people just do that with the switch online nowadays