User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 74
  6. 75
  7. 76
  8. 77
  9. 78
  10. 79
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596

Posts by Obbe

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It's not about what I think, though, it's about independent sources.

    That's literally just what you think.

    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ If the source isn't independent, then it's just religion, not science.

    You quote actual scripture all the time.

    The credibility of scientific studies is not solely determined by their funding source. While independent funding can be one factor that contributes to the credibility of research, it is not the sole determinant. The credibility of a scientific study depends on various factors, including the study's design, methodology, transparency, peer review, and reproducibility.

    Independent funding is often considered desirable because it helps minimize potential biases that could arise from conflicts of interest. When studies are funded by parties with a vested interest in the research outcomes, there is a possibility of bias or influence that may compromise the integrity of the study. Independent funding, on the other hand, is often seen as less prone to such biases and can enhance the credibility of the research.

    However, it is important to note that the mere presence of independent funding does not automatically guarantee the credibility of a study. The research methods employed, the expertise of the researchers involved, adherence to ethical standards, transparency in reporting, and the ability to replicate the findings are all crucial aspects that contribute to the credibility of scientific studies.

    Peer review, where experts in the field evaluate the study's methodology, results, and conclusions, also plays a vital role in assessing the credibility of research. Peer-reviewed studies have undergone scrutiny by independent experts, which helps validate their scientific rigor and enhance their credibility.

    In summary, while independent funding can contribute to the credibility of scientific studies by reducing potential biases, it is just one aspect among several that determine the overall credibility of research. Rigorous methodology, transparency, peer review, and reproducibility are equally important factors to consider when evaluating the credibility of scientific studies.
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ You should try researching the acknowledgments at the bottom of the study to determine credibility before posting worthless garbage: "S.W. received funding from NE/W005050/1, NE/T00391X/1, ES/T007877/1, ES/R009279/1, AH/W003813/1 and BB/X010961/1. G.S.C. received funding by the UKRI-GCRF Action Against Stunting Hub (project ref. MR/S01313X/1)."

    Um, tell me again who cares what you think is credible?
  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Ecological tipping points could occur much sooner than expected, study finds

    Ecological collapse is likely to start sooner than previously believed, according to a new study that models how tipping points can amplify and accelerate one another.

    Based on these findings, the authors warn that more than a fifth of ecosystems worldwide, including the Amazon rainforest, are at risk of a catastrophic breakdown within a human lifetime.

    “It could happen very soon,” said Prof Simon Willcock of Rothamsted Research, who co-led the study. “We could realistically be the last generation to see the Amazon.”
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson From the interview PREDICTING WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN…while ignoring 2 billion years of life on Earth and what actually happened under even more extreme circumstances.

    …sounds like you have your head in the sand again…



    Oh and are you so poorly educated you think high levels of oxygen are require for life?

    1. the Oxygen isn't going anywhere simply because temperatures increase…in fact it would probably result in MORE oxygen as there would be more plant growth.

    2. Oxygen isn't required for life to exist.

    Show me your degrees in climate science and marine biology.
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Risk is measured by past experience dummy…

    Not true. From the interview:

    Those conditions come together and create anoxic conditions, no oxygen for the fish. And so you have this big die-off.
  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I'm pretty sure everbody (including you) didn't know 100 million years ago the oceans were 15C hotter …which equates to the fact life is NOT at risk…if you know that you wouldn't be posting shit about it being at a tipping point etc…because, it's not. PER THE ACTUAL HISTORICAL FACTS.

    Stay in school kid


    People don't study climate change because they think the primordial ooze is at risk. They study it because of all the things that are at risk. You aren't saying anything relevant.
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny your speculating modern live is normal for this planet.

    Nope.
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Bradley Yes. So how it goes is like Vinny and Aldra are the same race. Vinny is a cambodian or laotian ladyboy, his profession is similar to his mothers except he has a penis, he don't know who his dad was, that nigga who had 6$ and an hour of free time, that makes him the lowest caste, then you got this white man who fucks a japanese person (Where the best asians come from) and produces something like of high esteem

    similarly the nordic regions have the best whites and the farther south & south east, it kinda becomes like VinnyLand instead, still white if you're russian, but kinda bottom of the barrel white.

  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Google even had to wipe all their search results on the topic that go past the last 10 years, so people couldn't just look up the lies for themselves. Pretty sad, when you think about it for a second or two.

    Yeah, what I find sad is how you lie to yourself.
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Not true, and it's really all just a matter of public record. Weak attempts at history rewrites just come off as pathetic and sad.

    It is true, and it is all recorded.
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

    This meme has been demonstrated to be false multiple times throughout this thread, yet you cling to it like a drowning man attempts to cling to the water that is suffocating him.

    Also, you forgot about these again:

    Even 50-year-old climate models correctly predicted global warming

    Climate Change Predictions from the Past are Coming True

    Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

    Climate predictions have mostly come true

    20 years on, climate change projections have come true
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    A bit of nostalgia.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Himalayan Glacier Loss Speeding Up, New Report Finds

    “Things are happening quickly,” said Miriam Jackson, a cryosphere researcher at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development and one of the authors of the report. “Just from two decades ago to the last decade, there’s been quite big changes. And I think that’s a surprise for lots of people, that things are just happening so fast.”

    As these mountain glaciers shrink, meltwater will increase — for a little while. The system will eventually reach a point, around approximately 2050, when the glaciers have shrunk so much that their meltwater starts to dwindle, the report said. The researchers call this turning point “peak water.”
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Lol,

    it's perfectly relevant to the discussion…LIFE WITH CONTINUE AND THRIVE…IT'S NOT AT RISK by an increase in temperature.

    …how is that not relevant??



    ..and again…99% of all species that ever existed are extinct…it's the NATURAL cycle of life…preserving "modern" hedgehogs or humans isn't going to change that…

    Literally just told you why - everybody already knows that. Nobody cares. Therefore it isn't relevant.

    Originally posted by Bradley obbe are you a woman or a man?

    Serious question, someone referenced you an old totsean as a female, because you only talk of an intellectual nature, I have never viewed you femininely.

    Thank you for your answer.

    I'm a man.

    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I could ask you and your fraud buddies the same thing.

    Don't bother, the answer is very obvious - the people who consistently reply to facts and news posted in this thread with their tired old rhetoric obviously care very much who I think is credible.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I said life..not modern life…even with a cursory knowledge of life and it's history that fact is it's ALWAYS adapted…we know life can thrive in much higher temperatures…again fact.

    Stay in school kid.

    That isn't relevant to the discussion. Everyone already knows "life" can endure conditions that humans would not.
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson except 100 million yrs ago the oceans were 15c warmer…and oxygen content was higher…go with the facts kid rather than speculation

    You are speculating that modern life and life from 100 million years ago can endure the same conditions.
  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson so ocean life isnt in danager…duh

    From the interview:

    Those conditions come together and create anoxic conditions, no oxygen for the fish. And so you have this big die-off.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 74
  6. 75
  7. 76
  8. 77
  9. 78
  10. 79
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596
Jump to Top