User Controls
Posts by Obbe
-
2017-07-24 at 8:52 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by benny vader what does free speech have anything to do with having an interest in what you have to say ???
i mean … if ''freespeech'' is to be a consideration … shouldnt it be YOU that should be tolerating the bukake of shits coming in your direction from people who have 0 interest in your topic or what you have to say ???
instead of you asking them not to post ''shits'' in your thread ????
i dont think you understand the notion of freespeech here.
No I shouldn't fucking tolerate it. If they don't care about the topic they should fuck right off. You're right though, I don't know why I brought up free speech. -
2017-07-24 at 8:47 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by NARCassist i'm just not in the mood right now
.
Yeah, me either. I'm kind of in a "Fuck You" mood now. Like, take RisiR. That passive aggressive neurotic fuck, follows me around he forums, thanks the off-topic replies in my thread and then makes his own shit post. WTF RisiR? Why don't you just follow me around posting "I don't like you, I don't like you, tra-la-la-la-la." -
2017-07-24 at 8:37 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by benny vader yea … i understand. apparently all these people are not your friend.
i believe there are greener plateaus out there.
At the very least there once were people in this community who appreciated free speech and participated in the exhange of information and the search for higher truths. Those were the people I literally grew up talking to everyday, even if they were not my friends. They were still good. I think they are mostly gone now. -
2017-07-24 at 8:33 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 8:18 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubYou're right, let the piss fall where it may.
-
2017-07-24 at 8:12 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by benny vader once you click that ''submit'' button your thread became public, like public washroom became public.
the only way people cant shit on your thread is you putting your texts under a thick, heavy duty burkha and pack it deep in your hdd.
The whole point of linking the forum to stuff I'm interested in is to see what my peers think about that stuff. And I guess that is really what is happening. Nobody here is that interested in stuff like this.
I just wish they were. -
2017-07-24 at 6:45 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationIf it's too much for your infantile attention span to handle, then don't bother posting anything in the first place.
Seriously. How many times have you posted a thread in a topical forum about something you're really interested in, only to have me come shit all over it for no reason?
That's right. 0 times. I never do that shit.
Yet every single time I try to contribute anything to this place, some smug fuck who thinks his shit doesn't stink has to come take a huge dump in my thread. -
2017-07-24 at 6:38 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by NARCassist didn't read
but, coming in this fred gave me a little thought. what if you took the red pill and woke up in your little pod with all the wires hanging out of you and it turned out the machines had written the matrix code to make humans look completely different to what we really are. so you wake up as some hideous looking reptilian or some fucked up shit. then you'd be like "fuck, david icke's suddenly starting to make more sense, fuuuuuuuuck".
how can we even be sure we even look like this?
.
Please contribute to the topic. Why won't you read it? Why won't you watch it? Will you at least stop shitposting if you won't post anything useful? -
2017-07-24 at 6:33 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationOne of the most mysterious aspects of quantum mechanics has to do with reality only existing when it is observed.
Well, who or what is it observed by?
Famous physicist John Wheeler said, “no phenomenon is a real phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon.” He also said, “we are participants in bringing into being not only the near and here, but the far away and long ago.” Wheeler suspected that consciousness is fundamental to actualizing reality by observing it. Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek wrote that the literature on the interpretation of quantum mechanics is “famously contentious and obscure.” He then said, “I believe it will remain so until someone constructs, within the formalism of quantum mechanics, an ‘observer,’ that is, a model entity whose states correspond to a recognizable caricature of conscious awareness.”
So what is this conscious awareness that observes reality into existence?
Emergence theory defines this observer not as a human being or animal who is seeing or being aware of something––but as a "unit of consciousness," or viewing vector that exists at all scales of reality, starting at the Planck scale (the smallest scale that exists in physics.) In Emergence theory's still-evolving framework, emergent universal consciousness self-references itself into existence via a massively efficient geometric, binary code/language of measurements. For the 3D quasicrystalline point space that we theorize is the substructure of reality to behave as this language or code, an observer is required at every point of the quasicrystal in order to make the freewill choices regarding the states of the tetrahedral building blocks of reality in every given moment. This means that at the center of every single tetrahedron/pixel in the quasicrystal there is a unit of consciousness that observes its immediate surrounding and makes binary choices regarding changes in the states of reality at every single moment in time. Each such unit of consciousness is a component of a massive, intricate neural network – a universal scale, collective consciousness that observes the universe at all scales and all times, actualizing reality – including itself - by observing it. -
2017-07-24 at 6:12 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 6:09 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationEmergence theory views spacetime in a way that builds on Einstein’s spacetime model, in which the future and past exist simultaneously in one geometric object. We view this object as a system in which all frames of spacetime interact with all other frames all the time. In other words, there is a constant, dynamic, causality loop relationship between all moments in time, in which the past influences the future and the future influences the past.
We view consciousness as both emergent and fundamental. In its fundamental form, consciousness exists inside every tetrahedron/pixel in the 3D quasicrystal in the form of something we call viewing vectors. Think of viewing vectors as micro-scale observers in the traditional quantum mechanical sense. These observers actualize reality by making ultra-fast, Planck scale choices about the binary states of the pixels (on, off, left, right) at every moment in time. This fundamental, primitive, yet highly sophisticated, form of consciousness steers the patterns on the quasicrystalline point-space toward more and more meaning. Eventually consciousness expands into higher degrees of order such as nature and life as we know it. From there life and consciousness keep expanding, growing exponentially, into all corners of the universe. Imagine humankind one day populating trillions of galaxies, its instantaneous communicative channels and high levels of consciousness growing over time into a massive, universal-scale neural network––a collective consciousness of sorts. This collective consciousness conceives the fundamental, “primitive” consciousness that powers the quasicrystal from which it emerges.
A creates B.
B creates C.
And C creates A.
There are no known laws in physics that place an upper limit on what percentage of the universe can exponentially self-organize into freewill systems such as us humans. Indeed, physics allows the possibility that all the energy of the universe can be converted into a single, conscious system that itself is a network of conscious systems. Given enough time, what can happen will eventually happen. By this axiom, universal emergent consciousness has emerged via self-organization somewhere ahead of us in 4D spacetime. And because it is possible, it is inevitable. In fact, according to the evidence of retro-causality time loops, that inevitable future is co-creating us right now just as we are co-creating it. -
2017-07-24 at 6:08 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 6:08 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by NARCassist at it again i see
http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/emergence-theory-overview
.
If you even bothered to read the thread you would have seen that I already posted the source, stop your snivelling and add some constructive content if you're going to bother posting anything at all. -
2017-07-24 at 6:05 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubSure, Sure, and next thing you know you'll just be pissing all over the ground because "it's like one big urinal".
-
2017-07-24 at 5:50 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationOn a TV or computer screen the smallest, indivisible unit is a 2D pixel. In our 3D quasicrystalline reality, the tetrahedron is the smallest, indivisible unit. A 3D pixel of reality, if you will. Each tetrahedron is the smallest possible 3D shape that can exist in this reality: the length of each of its edges is the Planck length (the shortest possible length known in physics - over 10^35 times smaller than a meter) These 3D pixels combine with one another according to specific, geometric rules, to populate all of space.
On a 2D screen, the pixels never move. They simply have different brightness and color values, and an illusion of meaning (in the form of a picture) is created by their combined values. Similarly, the tetrahedra in the 3D quasicrystal never move either. Instead, they act as a binary language: in any given moment, each tetrahedron can be chosen by the code operator to be either “on” or “off.” If it is “on,” it can be in one of two states: “rotated left” or “rotated right.”
Imagine a single, frozen moment in time throughout the entire universe. Let’s call this moment “moment 1” for the purposes of illustration. In moment 1, the 3D quasicrystal filling the entire universe is in “state 1” and in this state, some tetrahedra are on, some are off, some are rotated left and some are rotated right. Now imagine the next frozen moment in time, “moment 2.” In moment 2, the quasicrystal is in “state 2.” In this new state, many of the tetrahedra are in different states from their states in moment 1. Now imagine a hundred of these moments. Now imagine an animation of all of these frozen moments.
If you think of a movie, the moving-image is composed of single, frozen frames that are filmed and projected at a certain speed (24 frames per second in most modern movies). In our model, one second contains 10^44 frozen frames. Over many of these frames patterns emerge on the 3D quasicrystal. These patterns become more and more meaningful and sophisticated with time. Gradually patterns resembling and acting as particles form on the quasicrystal. In fact, one of the most groundbreaking predictions Emergence theory will make is about a specific, pixelated substructure of electrons––particles currently thought of, without proof, as dimensionless. With time, these particles take on more and more complex forms, and eventually the reality we all know and love emerges. -
2017-07-24 at 5:26 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationA central feature of reality behaving geometrically is that all fundamental particles and forces in nature, including gravity, can transform into one another, through a process called gauge symmetry transformation, in a manner that corresponds precisely to the vertices of the 8-dimensional polytope of a crystal called the E8 lattice. However, we do not appear to live in an 8-dimensional universe. Experimental evidence indicates that we live in a universe comprised of only three spatial dimensions.
What kind of geometric language or code, then, would express a geometric, 3-dimensional reality that is deeply linked to the 8-dimensional, E8 lattice?
We believe the answer is in the language and mathematics of quasicrystals. A quasicrystal is an aperiodic, but not random, pattern. A quasicrystal in any given dimension is created by projecting a crystal - a periodic pattern - from a higher dimension to a lower one. For example, imagine projecting a 3-dimensional checkerboard - or cubic lattice made of equally spaced and sized cubes - onto a 2-dimensional plane at a certain angle. This 3D cubic lattice is a periodic pattern that may stretch out infinitely in all directions. The 2D, projected object is not a periodic pattern. Rather, it is distorted due to the angle of projection, and instead of containing only one shape that repeats infinitely like the 3D crystal does, it contains a finite number of different shapes (called proto-tiles) that are oriented relative to one another in specific ways, governed by a set of mathematical/geometrical rules, to fill the 2D plane in all directions. By analyzing the 2D projection it is possible, with the correct mathematical and trigonometric toolkit, to actually recover the "mother" object in 3D (the cubic lattice crystal in this example.) A famous example of a 2D quasicrystal is thePenrose tiling conceived by Roger Penrose in the 1970’s, in which a 2D quasicrystal is created by projecting a 5-dimensional cubic lattice to a 2D plane.
Emergence theory focuses on projecting the 8-dimensional E8 crystal to 4D and 3D. When the fundamental 8D cell of the E8 lattice (a shape with 240 vertices known as the “Gosset polytope”) is projected to 4D, two identical, 4D shapes of different sizes are created. The ratio of their sizes is the golden ratio. Each of these shapes are constructed of 600 3-dimensional tetrahedra rotated from one another by a golden-ratio based angle. We refer to this 4D shape as the “600-Cell.” The 600-Cells interact in specific ways (they intersect in 7 golden-ratio related ways and “kiss” in one particular way) to form a 4D quasicrystal. By taking 3D subspaces of this 4D quasicrystal and rotating them from one another at a certain angle, we form a 3D quasicrystal that has one type of proto-tile: a 3D tetrahedron. -
2017-07-24 at 4:58 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationAt the root of emergence theory’s formalism is a concept quickly taking hold in the theoretical physics community––that all of reality is made of information. What is information? Information is meaning conveyed by symbols. Languages and codes are groups of such symbols that convey meaning. The various possible arrangements of these symbols are governed by rules. The language user makes free-will choices regarding how to arrange the symbols, in order to produce meaning, according to these rules. Fundamentally, then, the existence of information must therefore imply a “chooser,” or some form ofconsciousness, in order for it to be actualized.
We identify two classes of symbols. One class contains those symbols that subjectively represent something other than the symbols themselves. For example, the shape of two intersecting diagonal lines (“X”) can represent the mathematical concept of multiplication, it can represent an English letter, or it can represent a kiss. The shapes known as the letters “D-O-G” can represent a certain animal that we all know and love, but they can also represent anything else if we decide that they do. The second and arguably more fundamental class of symbols are those symbols that represent themselves with ultra-low subjectivity. An example is the shape of a square representing the shape of a square. Such a geometric language using geometric symbols could express geometric meaning.
Reality is experimentally observed to be geometric at all scales, from the Planck level to the largest structures. Our group hypothesizes that an entirely geometric language or code, using geometric symbolism, is the fundamental way in which meaning, in the form of our physical reality, is expressed by…well, we’ll get to that. -
2017-07-24 at 3:15 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation"Emergence theory is a unified first-principles theory currently in development by a Los Angeles-based team of scientists. Emergence theory weaves together quantum mechanics, general and special relativity, the standard model and other mainstream physics theories into a complete, fundamental picture of a discretized, self-actualizing universe."
http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/emergence-theory-overview -
2017-07-23 at 11:09 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationI just like to share videos I like with my niggas.
-
2017-07-23 at 7:56 PM UTC in im so stonedMe too nigga
