User Controls
Posts by Obbe
-
2017-07-25 at 11:46 PM UTC in Impliment some moderation
Originally posted by Zankwest Yeah well im burning through a limited supply of alts to tell you that Lanny is the worst admin in TOTSE history. I didn't do a fucking thing besides make every female on this forum fall in love with me which made mantits vermouth jealous and deleteban me to HB like sploo
I always thought you were ok. Always reminded me of a more destitute, less knowledgeable version of Rizzo. -
2017-07-25 at 11:20 PM UTC in ITT we post really sexy women
-
2017-07-24 at 10:37 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationOk.
-
2017-07-24 at 10:35 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 10:21 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationI dunno, the guy responsible for this stuff is a fraud anyways.
-
2017-07-24 at 10:12 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 10:12 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationYeah NARC. It does make me mad. Although, I'm pretty sure you Google every large post I post just to see if you can find it out there on the web. That kinda makes me laugh.
-
2017-07-24 at 10:08 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationSeriously RisiR, just say what you wanna say. Don't beat around the bush.
-
2017-07-24 at 9:47 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationAnyway, while waiting for someone to talk with me about this, I went ahead and found out it's all bullshit anyway.
Thanks for nothing.Having made a large amount of money from this business, Irwin has started promoting pseudoscience. He has registered an organization with the deceptively prestigious title and domain name of "Quantum Gravity Research"[10] and has begun releasing videos and articles about cold fusion, the golden ratio, crystals, and consciousness. To make it more prestigious, he has hired several actual physics graduates — but in their uploaded lectures he talks over them.[11][12]
He was also a co-founder of Ray Kurzweil's Singularity "University" in 2007.[13]
While it existed, he attempted to keep his Wikipedia article in good order.[14]
He also made the 30 minute youtube documentary "What is reality?". It covers a number of topics and misunderstands almost all of them, and at the end asks the audience for money.[15]
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Klee_Irwin#cite_note-13 -
2017-07-24 at 9:42 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Emergence theory views spacetime in a way that builds on Einstein’s spacetime model, in which the future and past exist simultaneously in one geometric object. We view this object as a system in which all frames of spacetime interact with all other frames all the time. In other words, there is a constant, dynamic, causality loop relationship between all moments in time, in which the past influences the future and the future influences the past.
If the past and the future exist simultaneously and influence each other, how does this suggest anything could suddenly stop existing? That doesn't even make sense. -
2017-07-24 at 9:27 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationHow does it seem to suggest that? Where does it suggest "when the observers stop observing, the universe would stop existing"?
-
2017-07-24 at 9:22 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubOpen ur pussie
-
2017-07-24 at 9:20 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
Originally posted by Sophie … OP was talking about how a person observing something influences reality.
Where? Do you mean this part?Emergence theory defines this observer not as a human being or animal who is seeing or being aware of something––but as a "unit of consciousness," or viewing vector that exists at all scales of reality, starting at the Planck scale (the smallest scale that exists in physics.) In Emergence theory's still-evolving framework, emergent universal consciousness self-references itself into existence via a massively efficient geometric, binary code/language of measurements. For the 3D quasicrystalline point space that we theorize is the substructure of reality to behave as this language or code, an observer is required at every point of the quasicrystal in order to make the freewill choices regarding the states of the tetrahedral building blocks of reality in every given moment. This means that at the center of every single tetrahedron/pixel in the quasicrystal there is a unit of consciousness that observes its immediate surrounding and makes binary choices regarding changes in the states of reality at every single moment in time. Each such unit of consciousness is a component of a massive, intricate neural network – a universal scale, collective consciousness that observes the universe at all scales and all times, actualizing reality – including itself - by observing it.
-
2017-07-24 at 9:13 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubI'm just joking I don't believe that at all.
-
2017-07-24 at 9:08 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubonly pussies, and and people equipped with them care about where their pees flow.
-
2017-07-24 at 9:07 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 9:03 PM UTC in We are living in a simulation
-
2017-07-24 at 8:59 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubonly pussies, and and people equipped with them care about where their pees land.
-
2017-07-24 at 8:58 PM UTC in We are living in a simulationIn this system, each unit of consciousness inhabits a point on the quasicrystal, and as if it is looking through a pinhole, observes other points of the structure to form information. That information is the view itself. For example, imagine you are observing three lights in the sky that are at an equal distance from one another and forming a perfect equilateral triangle. You, the observer, are on the ground and much closer to one of the lights than to the other two. So you will not actually see an equilateral triangle. Instead, you will see a transformed triangle that is a new piece of geometric information––essentially a measurement that tells you the relationship of the three lights to one another and your relationship to all three.
In this way, the points of consciousness observe the fundamental geometry of tetrahedral building blocks, or pixels, at the smallest scale of reality (the Planck scale) to form geometric symbols equal to the meaning of a rotation of one the tetrahedra. For example, imagine you are sitting on a chair in front of a cube. You look at this cube and, in your mind, you transform it to a flat picture in 2D. Call this picture a “symbol”. What does that symbol mean to you? Well, to most people it means (1) a 3D cube, not a flattened, 2D object and (2) it has the meaning of your relationship to the cube – the location or angle of your viewing of it. Next, imagine that you move your chair one foot to the side and look at the cube again. What do you see? Again, you see a 2D symbol that, to you, has the meaning of the full 3D cube. But this time, your viewpoint contains different information, expressing the meaning of your second location. Compare the meaning of the two locations. The meaning of this comparison is a rotation of the cube. The meaning of the two successive 2D images of the cube is equal to sitting in the first position and watching the cube itself change positions or rotate instead of yourself. Either interpretation is acceptable. -
2017-07-24 at 8:54 PM UTC in I should just piss in the tubWhy don't you just piss your bed, no water required.
