User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 443
  6. 444
  7. 445
  8. 446
  9. 447
  10. 448
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596

Posts by Obbe

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Ok. Think you'll be alright?
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    My friend gave me his old Wii U a couple months ago. It's been cool.
  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by infinityshock obviously not

    Yes I do. He was born in September. That's 6 months ago.
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jeremus I said I didn't believe that though.

    Lets move on to a more interesting topic: what would make something intelligent to you? What is the bar?

    You don't believe you have experience or intelligence?

    Bless your heart!
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jeremus Obbe did that by making it.

    You are the reason we cannot be friends.
  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws Look it here I can cite stuff too:

    “The definition of intelligence is controversial.[6]”
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence#Definitions


    [6] S. Legg; M. Hutter. "A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence". 157: 17–24. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1565458

    If there is no agreed upon definition for intelligence, why do you say plants cannot be intelligent?
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws I never said they make decisions.

    There is obviously data showing they can sense their environment etc, as you’ve provided. That doesn’t prove your claim that this can be called intelligence. THAT would be semantics.

    Nice try

    According to this plants do fit the definition...

    https://niggasin.space/thread/21377?p=3#post-362877
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws When arguing semantics it’s important to me to establish a baseline.

    But that’s alright I didn’t feel like talking about it anyways.

    So you are just arguing semantics? In other words, you agree that these plants sense their environment, process the information and make decisons, you just don't want to call that intelligence (for some reason).

  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jeremus Did you lose your balls or what? What of it?


    If you believe people and animals possess "intelligence and experience", why not plants?
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws Yeah but you need to answer my question so I can answer your question. Trust me ok

    There is no reason we need to talk about how we define life before you explain why you think plants cannnot demonstrate intelligence.
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by greenplastic How do you define communication, open your mind? Is it the exchange of information? If I'm playing pool, and I hit the white ball and it transfers some energy to another ball that it hits, would it be accurate to say that the balls are communicating?

    When I push air through my vocal cords in a specific pattern and you hear those sounds and interpret that information, is that fundamentally different than a plant sending information to other plants using chemicals and the analogous senses these lifeforms use to detect said chemicals?



    Originally posted by Fox Paws I’ll answer your question with a question. Just to establish a baseline.

    What does it mean for something to be “alive”? Basically what are the characteristics you would use to differentiate, say, a dog from a brick?

    Can you just answer the question I asked you first? I mean we can talk about what life means and how we define it later. First I want to talk about plant intelligence and why you think intelligence cannot be applied to plants, even after considering the cited findings in this thread.
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws Because the way I define intelligence and experience in the context of people and animals does not apply to plants, even considering the cited findings in this thread.

    Why not?
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The word intelligence derives from the Latin intelegere; to choose between. In situations of choice if the decision made after assessment is beneficial, it is considered to be an intelligent decision. Legg and Hutter (2007) collected some 70 different definitions of intelligence and summarized them as follows. Intelligence: (i) Is a property that an individual has as it interacts with its environment or environments. (ii) Is related to the agents ability to succeed or profit with respect to some goal or objective. (iii) Depends on how able the agent is to adapt to different objectives or environments.

    In the same numerical order. (i) Wild plants interact with and respond to their environment via competitive and other biotic and abiotic signals. (ii) The goal or objective is fitness with seed number as a fitness proxy. Those most successful, and thus most fit, provide more offspring. (iii) Fitness depends on the skill with which individuals best adapt to their environment throughout their life cycle (McNamara and Houston, 1996). Those individual plants that can master and adapt to the problems of competition, master other biotic and abiotic stresses with greater plasticity, lower cost, higher probability, or more rapidly, are fitter and on this basis are more intelligent. Finally intelligence is a capacity for problem solving, (the psychologists choice) and profiting from experience another (Jennings, 1923; Gardner, 1983; Sternberg and Detterman, 1986; Sternberg, 1986). All effectively say the same thing.


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845027/
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws “You” don’t know anything. “You” don’t exist.

    Also your cat is not six months old. Age is an illusion. Age would imply that your cat is something unique that only began existing at a certain point in time. The matter that constitutes your cat has been around since the beginning of time, just like everything else.

    In other words, everything is the same age, thus “age” means nothing.

    True.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Xlite Why am i the only one who's had the same avatar for 900 years?

    Afraid to change?
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by greenplastic poor kitty. i hope he gets better soon.

    Thanks greenie. The medication seems to help.
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by infinityshock that head/body ratio is NOT six months old

    and. you should put it out of its pain. euthanasia is its only recourse.

    I know how old my cat is.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fox Paws Oh my fucking god you’re a solipsist

    If you believe other people and animals possess "intelligence and experience", why not plants?
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Enter havent read the thread but i guarantee whatever obbe's said about plants communicating and thinking is complete bullshit

    Wrong.
  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jeremus No. I don't even think I do.

    Bless your heart.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 443
  6. 444
  7. 445
  8. 446
  9. 447
  10. 448
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596
Jump to Top