User Controls
Posts by Obbe
-
2018-09-09 at 6 PM UTC in The Odroid Go
-
2018-09-09 at 5:51 PM UTC in The Odroid Go
-
2018-09-09 at 5:42 PM UTC in The Odroid GoI've downloaded a variety of games for this device, mostly from this site:
https://vimm.net
However some games had to downloaded from other sites.
I have mostly been playing a ROM hack called Pokemon Red DX. It feels like the classic game with new features and new surprises. -
2018-09-09 at 5:35 PM UTC in The Odroid GoI recently purchased an Odroid Go for $32. An Odroid Go is a DIY portable handheld game console/emulator that plays NES, Gameboy, Gameboy Colour, Sega Gamegear and Master system as well as Colecovision if you update the firmware to the latest version.
Putting the device together is fun, easy and doesn't take very long. You can also buy replacement parts if you were to break something. There is no soldering required, all the parts simply plug into place. An SD card is required and is not included in the kit.
The screen is excellent quality. The shell feels like good quality, the buttons feels great. The battery life is great, lasts me days with the amount I use it, have heard that it will last average of 6+ hours of constant usage with low volume and normal backlight setting.
The sound quality is not the greatest at higher volume but is absolutely fine at low volume. There is no headphone jack but the device is Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capable - these are currently not utilized but future updates maybe possible to use Bluetooth headphones with the odroid go. Currently I have seem one person who is selling headphone jacks that plug into the 10-pin port on the top of the device for about $15 online.
I recommend this device for anyone interested in portable classic gameing.
Odroid Go:
https://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G152875062626
Firmware Updates:
(Device)
https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=158&t=31513&sid=2bd46c6059294919a25abd5a83f81777
(Application)
https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=159&t=31348&sid=66c38fb49b5353daa2e89f2f540c0f61
Headphone Jack:
https://backofficeshow.com/shop/odroidgohat
Case:
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/aw/d/B00F5CKWBA/ref=ya_aw_od_pi?ie=UTF8&psc=1 -
2018-09-02 at 11:41 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-06-29 at 12:24 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-06-28 at 11:59 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain Whether or not you feel it doesn't matter here, neither does what you feel on this specific issue. It doesn't matter because you don't even know what it means to feel a moral obligation. This entire conversation is meaningless unless you can surmount this particular hurdle.
I'm not necessarily in favour of Zanick's argument in specific, what I am trying to explain to you is how you could feel a moral obligation to do anything, and then you can actually have a rational conversation with Zanick or Lanny.
In my system, you can feel a moral obligation to not eat meat if you believe that your justification for eating meat will somehow be a degradation of your own ethics or rights, or if eating an alternative to meat would somehow lead to a greater expression of your own freedoms.
So for example if you think that the practice of eating meat (or any other relevant activity, maybe driving a gas guzzling truck) will increase the chances of someone being flooded, and you do not want others' to raise your own chances of being flooded any higher than they are through their meat eating (or other activity), you have created a moral obligation to not eat meat, because if everyone ate meat and used the justification that they'll do it because they can and because it's tasty, like you do, then your chances of being flooded go up, and you have now hurt your own interests if your behaviour was generalized. You've made that determination of bad and good, but you've made it through consistency and self interest.
Why do you assume I don't know how it feels to feel morally obligated? Just because I think morality is relative doesn't mean I don't feel like things are right or wrong. I just don't feel like the things I feel are right or wrong necessarily applies to other people and vice versa. -
2018-06-28 at 10:07 PM UTC in Decisions Decisions
-
2018-06-28 at 9:53 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatI know you're trying Falcon.
I still don't understand.
How am I morally obligated to not eat meat? I feel no such obligation exists. -
2018-06-28 at 8:09 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain Why would only morality be irrelevant? You are literally making a logically incoherent statement here.
You gave subjectivity as a sole and direct reason for why morality is irrelevant (irrelevant to what?). If subjectivity makes morality irrelevant, why doesn't it make anything else irrelevant?
Because if morality is subjective nobody necessarily agrees with any one individuals preferences, so to say "you have a moral obligation" is like me saying you have an obligation to love vanilla ice cream because it's my favorite. -
2018-06-28 at 7:57 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatI only said morality is irrelevant. I think it's fine to say "vanilla ice cream is the best". But I don't think saying "we have a moral obligation to not eat meat" is very useful for anything.
-
2018-06-28 at 7:17 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by aldra interpretation of morality comes from the same place as any other one of your thoughts or desires; I think he was trying to use that as a parallel to discuss the difference between objectivity and subjectivity
I had to dig too far back to get through all the retarding so I don't know exactly what the original point of contention was
Thanks for trying to help but still don't understand... if individuals are "interpreting" morality is that not subjective?
If one person interprets a behavior as moral and another person interprets the same behavior as immoral... to me, that means morality is obviously relative. It's all in an individual's mind. To assume morality is objective must mean that one of those individuals are incorrect in their interpretation. So ... what do we look at to see who is incorrect? What is the objective part of morality Lanny and Falcon are claiming exists?
Do you understand what they are trying to explain to me Aldra? Can you explain it in a way dumb ol' Obbe might understand? -
2018-06-28 at 6:34 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
-
2018-06-28 at 2:31 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatI guess I just don't understand.
-
2018-06-28 at 1:01 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatI have not been interested in what you've been saying this entire time. I'm just waiting for Lanny to reply to me.
-
2018-06-28 at 12:50 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain Do you think that is an objective basis for your behaviour?
Yes, I think my desires and behaviors are simply my genes interacting with the environment.
If you have a point I think you could have made it like 6 posts ago. Say what you want to say instead of asking me an endless line of dumb questions. -
2018-06-28 at 11:44 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain Are you predestined by god to devolve into shitty semantic fallback arguments when you can't admit you're wrong? If you choose not to do something, you are rejecting the proposition of doing that thing in favour of something else. Either way, it doesn't change the question, you're just really shit at actually even avoiding the question.
And the question is simple , but I'll boil it down even further: what is the unit of measure of the "strength" of your desire? What objective source do you derive the conclusion that you like one thing more than the other from?
I don't know dude, apparently I have a much better grasp of the English language than you do.
I don't measure the "strength of my desire". I don't "conclude" that I like one thing more than another, I just like what I like. I don't believe any of this has anything to do with morality any more. You're just being stupid. -
2018-06-28 at 12:50 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain That's not an answer. You're not providing any objective A/B connection here. You have and reject a lot of thoughts on a daily basis. On what basis do you give preference to one idea over the other and decide whether or not to act on it?
I can ask this questions in many different ways but you're going to have to acknowledge that you are assigning a normative value to pursuing any particular desire and then somehow comparing them and making a decision on which decision you are going to make.
I don't "reject thoughts" or "give preference to one idea over another". You're not making sense. If I desire something more strongly than I desire something else, I'm going to end up thinking about and pursuing the thing I most desire. How are you even asking these questions? -
2018-06-27 at 11:31 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain Nobody cares about "would". If someone wants to murder you, they will do that too. The question is why they should. Again, you're not answering the question, just evading it by posing your irrational conclusion as part of your premise.
You have a thought in your brain. What justification do you have for pursuing it?
are you actually retarded? Who has to justify "pursuing their own thoughts"? That's nonsense. -
2018-06-27 at 11:17 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatI just think the answer is obvious. If their desire for survial is greater than their desire for meat, that's what they would do.
