User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. 13
  11. ...
  12. 103
  13. 104
  14. 105
  15. 106

Posts by Daily

  1. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Imagine living in an era where you get accused of "argumentum ad gross-out" like feeling physically disgusted at certain natural phenomena such as shit, rotten food and fucking prepubescent children hasn't been ingrained in us over millions of years as a survival strategy to protect the human species from disintegration. Imagine being so loyal to internet infographics that you defend pedos through "logical reasoning"

    What a time to be alive
  2. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Captain This magical idea of how things work in principle is call a priori reasoning. It's actually pretty funny that you wrote a proud post about how you're incapable of logical reasoning and instead draw your conclusion through argumentum ad gross-out

    Oh god

    Not you too
  3. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Incoming sophistry and backpedaling
  4. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Lanny I really don't see how it follows. You posted a laundry list of things which you seem to be saying LGBTQ communities do but replacing "gay" with "pedo" (I don't think this analogy works for the record) but there doesn't see to me a point. I can't even tell if this is supposed to be an indictment of gay people or pedophiles.

    The difference between me and you is that your mind priorises how things theoretically should follow over how things actually follow among organisms. This is especially common with people who have a background in philosophy, mathematics and computer science. You are struggling to condemn pedos because you say they dindu nuffin if they haven't molested a child, while I say we should condemn pedos even if they dindu nuffin because of past observable human behaviour in social movements.

    How much more do I have to explain to you before you either stand by your "no reasonable society should condemn a pedo if they haven't molested a child" statement, or admit that the wall of text I wrote has elements of predictability which you yourself indirectly claim to disagree with since you replied with "wat do u think the answer to this question is and what are u trying to accomplish by asking it"
  5. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Having the report button directly underneath created content is just not good from a design psychology standpoint

    Couldn't it just be placed near the post number or something
  6. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Lanny I have no idea what you're trying to say here.

    Hey mang, you're the one that said no reasonable society should condemn a pedo if he hasn't molested a child. I just gave you a wall of text describing hypothetical events parallel to recent social movements that assumed no child was molested, but you backpedaled by acting as if my questions did not follow from your stated opinion on pedos
  7. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    "I don't think any reasonable society can condemn a person for having a desire to do something unacceptable if it's not accompanied by unacceptable action"

    "What do you think the answer to this question is and what do you think you're accomplishing by asking it"
  8. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Something Squirrel Id fuck her

    Reported
  9. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Lanny I wouldn't really say I "object" to pedophilia at all. I don't like celery, it's unpleasant to me most of the time, but I don't have any particular problem with it. Likewise for pedophilia. Now of course when I say "I don't object to pedophilia" what I mean by "pedophilia" is the internal state of being attracted to children. Obviously I think raping children is inexcusable and I think the question of consent in minors is iffy enough to justify a blanket condemnation of sex with children. I just mean that I don't think any reasonable society can condemn a person for having a desire to do something unacceptable if it's not accompanied by unacceptable action.

    Taking this into account, if a #NotAllPedos twitter hashtag was trending after mass pedo arrests, would you say that this would be the right direction to go in order to highlight the fact that not all pedos molest children? If pedos came out to write more frequently for publications (like they already have done), began to protest in the street for pedophilia to be redefined as another sexual orientation that they could choose in a drop down menu on an online application and society was institutionally programmed to break through the taboo (like with homosexuality) would you be okay with pedos being celebrated on front page news for coming out, becoming the main and supporting characters on TV shows and movies, pedo jokes being made before watershed time as long as they aren't graphic, showbiz romanticising the hurting pedo who isn't able to fuck the little girl because society condemns it like they did with the negro, with talented pedos contributing to their field and then being used as an example of how great being a pedo is relative to being "cis", with pedos then being granted adoption access which nobody believed would happen with homos and trannies because muh slippery slope fallacy, with children then identifying as pedos when they're 11 and political orientation in most cases being linked to sexual orientation to further divide the public through identity politics and so on and so forth? Would you be okay with all of this since you're technically not anti-pedo, just anti-child molestation?
  10. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Wtf I reproted §m£ÂgØL because I thought clicking the spoiler took me to a new spoiler game page Lanny made

    I just reported Lanny for deceiving me into reporting §m£ÂgØL
  11. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Woah

    Ellaria sploo must really like u
  12. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Your dead lifeless faggot corpse. That's right - just take a look at your hands, move your tongue around, shift a little in your seat - all of your anatomy will belong to sploo after he beats your ass to death with a kitchen utensil
  13. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    When approached in the wild, a tendency to shriek and flail violently is not uncommon. This is important to note as slipping up electronically with sploo will lead him to track you down, beat you to death with any apparatus in proximity and then fuck your dead corpse
  14. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Unfortunately he has developed several lesions in his brain due to his heavy consumption of research chemicals, spice and D.X.M which has amplified his shallow effect while steadily enervating his ability to empathise with other humans
  15. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Just to save you guys some trouble, Da Leg Itches AKA sploo is literally an aut istic genius with an IQ above 160
  16. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Codebeta If the 3 of us were removed you'd be discussing mushrooms every day and jerking off with Infinity. This is the ultimate ass kissing you've done…to a few Nazis on drugs and no IQ. Very pathetic and disgusting.

    What's your IQ? Your knowledge on certain issues is adequate but the conclusions you reach are incredibly retarded. You are able to rote memorise but have difficulty using reason and breaking through jedi programming. Your entire worldview is contained within a small ideological box organically constructed by a tiny cabal of intellectual jedis who passed on their (objectively wrong) ideas on to their jedi and Shabbos goys successors

    I would estimate that your IQ is between 99 and 102. You probably read a lot of mainstream textbooks, don't do any resistance training, watch gangbang/double penetration porn and use words like problematic irl
  17. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by Da Leg Itches i fancy you

    would you like to be my first real victim?

    sploo pickup lines. gather round
  18. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]




  19. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by gumbo eat pork and drink alcohol

    Originally posted by gumbo drink alcohol

    Originally posted by gumbo alcohol

    Originally posted by gumbo punishment

    What was that last bit?
  20. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Potentially RIP Tommy Robinson

    He might legit get killed in prison like the guy that went to prison for putting a bacon sandwich outside a mosque

    I'm sure it will be reported as a "drug overdose"
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. 13
  11. ...
  12. 103
  13. 104
  14. 105
  15. 106
Jump to Top