User Controls
Thanked Posts by antinatalism
-
2016-11-26 at 10:12 AM UTC in This bitch is the physical embodiment of the type of girl I hate the most.that's how women are when they are out in the open. at least, until 100 years ago they had the excuse "we're not making scientific discoveries as gr8 as yours, we're not as good at chess as u, we're not as gr8 mathematicians as men because muh oppression! just wait and see, when we will be free we will outsmart u!". now that they have as much freedom as men, if not more, did anything change? not at all. what did they do with their freedom, enter? did they become computer scientists, physics, chess masters? nope, enter, they are as braindead as they were back then, but even more slutThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-26 at 9:50 AM UTC in sexrobots
Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump Just remove the desire for pleasure, much simpler.
why should I remove the desire for pleasure just because 3D carbon-based women are dogshit? that's a cuck argumentThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-26 at 9:42 AM UTC in sexrobots
Originally posted by Enter I can't wait for this. Women need to be obsolete.
If I had hitler like powers they'd be used for breeding and live in camps.
that's what gonna happen. women, on average, have no talent. science, literature, chess, sports, all those fields are dominated by men and their superior intellectual/physical skills. the only way women managed to get a place in our society is by using their ugly vagina and whining about muh patriarchy. Once sexrobots will become mainstream, even plebs will realize that there will be no need anymore to endure the bullshits of carbon-based women, and they'll eventually be deported into infrastructures owned by the sperm banks where they'll taken care of and they'll keep giving birth to other humans for the new utopia's sakeThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-26 at 9:10 AM UTC in sexrobotsfuck women
time to ditch carbon and embrace silicon
http://www.androidlovedolls.com/
your ideal gf will be reaility soon enoughThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-14 at 3:05 PM UTC in best breakfastthat's because the taste of a woman's tongue is disgusting, it's not your semen's faultThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-25 at 4:56 PM UTC in How much abuse do you think you would need to suffer before you turned full psycho.
Originally posted by RisiR I can smell your pussy.
u can grab it too. u are famous enoughThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-25 at 7:05 AM UTC in How much abuse do you think you would need to suffer before you turned full psycho.talking both from experience and general observations, more often than not what determines a psychological breaking point is the duration of a painful experience, not its intensity. the mind is designed to deal more easily with a short but extremely severe despair than with a long, repetitive agony that forks itself on a daily basis and leaves you in the most miserable powerlessness.
I'd say that I've gone full psycho after having to endure loads of shit for 3 yearsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-25 at 4:04 PM UTC in Why are female ghosts scarier?because the only relief when u think about women is that you know that they will eventually die. so if there's such a thing as a female ghost that would imply that women would keep harassing you even in their afterlifeThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-25 at 6:02 AM UTC in america is ran by jedis?
Originally posted by littleasianlady I'll give you this for free.
Israel had no friends when established. Soviets had strong influence in the Middle East.
America backed Israel. Israel was opposed by Soviet allies.
America as part of its' anti Soviet foreign policy had strong Israeli representation in its' foreign policy.
If facts are slightly misrepresented, everything is the fault of the jedis, and the jedis run America.
The Soviets tried to use the 'stealing of land' and 'jedis hate Muslims' to unite the Arab world against America via indoctrination and brainwashing/propaganda. By blaming Israel instead of naming America.
So people who want you to blame the jedis are working to create conditions to enable the influence, implementation, or adoption of the foreign policy of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah. They are going after America.
That's their propaganda aim.
It's not the jedis.
> muh ebil russia's foreign policy
get the fuck outta here, u israeli shill
and about jedis running the usa:
http://thezog.info/list-summaries/The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-24 at 1:02 PM UTC in I'm going to destroy this forum
Originally posted by RisiR
I'm really starting to like you. Hmm, that's sad.
i never forgot his face in this video. his eyes are the very definition of what means being dead insideThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-24 at 12:56 PM UTC in I'm going to destroy this forum"Now I am become RisiR, the destroyer of forums"The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-23 at 10:40 PM UTC in One liners you would like to use some day, but probably will never get the opportunity to do soalso: "I have to return some videotapes"The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-23 at 10:58 PM UTC in Ethnic cleansing of Europejust give them a one-way ticket to sweden and we'll be fineThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-21 at 7:11 PM UTC in How should I cope with stress and still be productive?I dunno, I spent the last 4 days watching Russia Today 24/24 and now I love assadThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-21 at 7:24 PM UTC in Mark cuckerberg is at it againso no shit, cuckerberg was lying. u know, that doesn't come as a surprise after a shit tons of research papers documented how much the subliminal effects that even slight hidden censorship and manipulations can have on the retards who use kikebook and jedigle (search engine manipulation effect and shit)The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-15 at 5:30 AM UTC in Best security for my laptop
Originally posted by SBTlauien What type of folks would that be aside from terrorists?
meme magician shitpostersThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-20 at 5:22 PM UTC in does any1 here liek meI used to like u. then you made a gay thread about real life friends and girlfriends. the harsh truth is that u don't hate women. fuck u, man, fuck uThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-20 at 5:23 AM UTC in ATTN: Antinatalism
Originally posted by Lanny I'm not sure how to feel about NiS getting weeby lately. On the one hand I'm a closet weeb so it's fun to shitpost about animu and mangos, but on the other hand we're supposed to be trill ass heavy pipe hitting niggas and you know I just can't reconcile these two things.
o tempora, o mores
Originally posted by Sophie Antinatalism,
Thank you for your reply. My room suddenly doesn't seem so dark now that you are here. Maybe, just maybe if we are depressed alone we can be happy together.
Love always, Sophie.
two negatives make a positive. let's give us a chance. this will be our love song
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-17 at 1:50 PM UTC in Note how women like horror movies more than guys.99% of the world belong to the tel-aviv botnet. women are just a proxy. do not trust themThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-19 at 6:33 PM UTC in Mathematics
Originally posted by Lanny In general I lean nominalist and while that doesn't totally commit one to believing mathematics is invented rather than discovered it lends itself to that conclusion and it is my general inclination. I watched a walk by Philip Wadler and he made this argument about how three or four mathematicians seemed to independently discover the decidability problem and that that was an argument for a discovery model of mathematics. Wadler is a really smart guy but I thought that was kind of a disingenuous move, it fails to acknowledge the distinction between axioms and theorems, the decidability problem is the product of systems in which it emerges, yes we may "discover" new properties of a formal system as in this case but that discovery is predicated on the invention of the system to start with. I'll claim that nothing which is discovered can be fully reduced to invented parts (I recently discovered my phone has a "do not disturb" feature, that's not an argument that my phone or that feature are discovered properties of the universe rather than something invented).
I agree up to a certain point with you. I'm more of an intuitionist than a platonist myself, and I think that axioms are invented and theorems are discovered within the structural limits drawn by the design of the axioms, which is basically what undecidability is all about (I guess that the three mathematicians you were talking about are godel, emil post and turing). So, for instance, working in number theory using the peano axioms rather than the presburger arithmetic is a whole different thing, and that's what I think has been the finishing blow to platonism: the fact that there are undecidable statements within a system implies that there's not such a thing as a perfect bijective function between the mind and the so called perfect platonic realm. Actually, I don't see much difference between religion and platonism since the last one asks for a blind faith in the aforementioned hyperuranion and it makes sense from an historic perspective since platonism stems from the pythagorean mysticism.
One might naturally make some argument from isomorphisms between our mathematics and the world as being evidence that mathematical systems are founded in natural, discovered elements of the world. But this fails too, to model the world post-hoc is not to be discovered. Consider natural languages model the world yet no one would claim that English was "discovered". Likewise the relationship of mathematics to the world is an intentional product of its genesis, it contains similar structures not because it is similar to the world but because it exists to model it.
However I find your critics of the analogy with the "do not disturb" phone feature kinda fallacious. The designers of a phone will know (virtually) every property of the phone they're developing, so there will be nothing to discover. But mathematics is on a whole different level of complexity. When cantor single-handedly created set theory he could have not predicted that the continuum hypothesis is undecidable, so this is something that has been "discovered" by paul cohen, but of course it was already a sort of "built-in feature" of axiomatic space they were working on. I dunno, man, it's fucked up and I'm getting confused, but I'd go as far as to say that the very fact that when you invent a system you cannot virtually know every property means that then everything else from that point forth is discovered.
About isomorphism between math and the real world, those are discovered too and since I think that the so called "pure mathematics" is an hoax and doesn't exist (fuck that faggot of harold hardy), I infer that every mathematical model will eventually be linked to something in the real world (that doesn't necessarily imply the opposite): for instance, category theory, which is known as the most abstract field of math, has been proved useful in many real-world fields (computational linguistics, sorting algorithms, AI and so on): ah, with real-world applications I talk about things that are discovered (such as new physics shit) and things that are invented (such as computer science stuff, artificial intelligence, automata theory). So math could be invented and sometimes only used for other things that have been invented and not discovered. Sounds very autistic.
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger Does the mind have no mathematical properties? Is there any way we could define it as a mathematical object? If I was a smarter man I would say perhaps but all I can say now is I don't know.
Yeah I think we could define the mind as a mathematical object and eventually we will in a much more rigorous way. But we do now by now is that the mind is not a turing machine because we do not crash by bumping into the halting problem when we reason around undecidable statements (at least we can prove that they undecidable, a computer cannot)The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!