User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 350
  6. 351
  7. 352
  8. 353
  9. 354
  10. 355
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts by Michael Myers

  1. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    He grabbed you by the balls, breh. That's what you get for ignoring my American Football LP2 thread.
  2. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Did you find them, aldra?
  3. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    American Football released their second LP since 17 years! What do you guys think? I wasn't a big fan of the vocals, but instrumentally I adored it. Now the vocals have grown on me and I appreciate the record more. What do you guys think?

  4. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    You're right! But if you were to ask me to name any shitty shoegaze bands, I wouldn't be able to tell you. And you're right, she's cute. How do you even have them? Did you seduce her?
  5. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Originally posted by Satyr All fine and dandy, but what is mentioned in the Quran and what (some!) Muslims do are not necessarily the same thing. The Quran might be one of the few religious texts that actually opposes violence to women and it doesn't mention anything about niqabs or burqa's.. Yet muslim women still wear them or are forced to wear them. Even the more moderate Muslims promote the covering up of hair. Extremist muslims still believe in strict sharia law, where women get their skulls bashed in for showing their hair. I have spoken with a Belgian who converted to Islam. He actually advocated killing his own sister because she's lesbian.

    In short: I don't think the argument "Quran doesn't promote violence, therefore no Muslims are violent, therefore fear for Islam is ungrounded" doesn't hold water.

    To be clear though, I don't think anyone should be afraid of Muslims or Islam. But the more radical sects? Whipe them off the face of the earth.

    Hey Satyr, first off, good to have you back. Second, you're correct. The Qur'an does not tell how women (and men, for that matter) should be dressed; rather, it says that we are required to cover up. Regardless of gender. See, it's a common misconception. Same thing happens with honor killings and executing homosexuals. They are a cultural thing, not a religious thing. In fact, honor killings are un-Islamic, same thing applies to executing homosexuals. But this does not happen often, I think. But a lot of people use it to further their anti-Muslim agenda, even though it is incorrect. They pretend as if it's an every day kind of thing, when it is not. I think the argument jumps to conclusions. Yes, the Qur'an does not promote unwarrented violence, but that does not mean Muslims can't be violent. After all, we're just human beings, and we are prone to human emotions, such as anger. Violence means you act in on that emotion. I think the Belgian is wrong in wanting his lesbian sister dead. But a lot of people think that way, actually. They all have their opinions, and I have no problem with that as long as they don't actively harm somebody in a physical fashion. I don't care if somebody is anti-gay or pro-gay, or anti-trans or pro-trans. PS: did you know that trans people are actually accepted in Pakistan, a Muslim-majority country? Hell, if someone is trans, and has to choose between being male or female, they can check the third box which says "third gender." And it's been that way for years. Yet Americans get their panties in a bunch when transgenders want to enter the bathroom they wish to enter. Pakistanis have no problem with that. Yet we are the ones who are "backwards." Funny, right?
  6. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    He scared breh.
  7. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Originally posted by aldra 'syrians'

    Alright, you got me there. Somalis. Pakistanis. They're not even refugees.. They're just looking at a cheap shot to make it into Europe. They need to get sent back.
  8. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Speaking of Ghost in the Shell, I am so stoked for it to be released. One of my favorite actors, Michael Pitt, plays the antagonist. He plays Kuze in the movie, and is a mixture of all the bad guys. In the trailer, you barely see anything of him. Just one, quick, dark shot, unfortunately. But his hair looks magnificent.
  9. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    It won't happen. It's just paranoid white supremacists, or at least racists, that think something's up. There is no ulterior motive of any kind. The Syrians aren't here to harm you. They are there to hide after your country fucked their country up. I'm assuming you're American, by the way.
  10. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    I'm on nobody's list? That's awesome, I knew y'all loved me. :)
  11. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Yes, I'm actually hideous. But my heart is golden. Or at least what's left of it.
  12. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    OP sounds like those guys who hate such garbs because they have this fetish for Arabic women and they try to holla at dem sisters and dem sisters are like "Nah, hold up kaffir" which led OP to this rant.
  13. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Originally posted by mmQ Light your face on fire and jump into a wood chipper





    Post last edited by Michael Myers at 2016-11-23T15:56:07.002288+00:00
  14. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Where do I fit into this?
  15. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Originally posted by Anal Scratch Hemorrage The French Knight Templars are particularly famous for this and this was one of the primary accusations against then when they were betrayed by King Lewis (i think but I'm not quite sure what king it was) who owed then great amount of money so he sought and found a way to kill them all instead of paying his debt.

    That's interesting. Also, you probably already know this, but the Crusades started after the pope lied to the people about their Christians brothers being slaughtered by Muslims. They were actually living in peace in Palestine. But the pope decided to fuck it up. I think it was because a king asked him to. I'm not entirely sure.
  16. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    And if yes, what did you think of that? I thought it was instumentally great but the vocals reminded me too much of Owen, which I wasn't that big a fan of in the beginning, but then it grew on me.
  17. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Any halal stuff? Thanks.
  18. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    (Cont) Which is what I thought you were doing, hence my reply.
  19. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    I have vast swathes of white women willingly serving as my human shields in exchange for my ethnically Persian shish kebab.

    Bless the white women; they're always nice and considerate.
  20. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Like I said, I have not read the Quran cover to cover. I did read the 14 verses leading up to my first quote, I have not gained any particular context, it seems to be a description of appropriate conduct during war?

    No, I'm just saying people like to take things out of context and give it a false spin: making it seem as us Muslims are bloody savages out to kill anybody who does not believe. But that's basically it, yeah, the verses are there for a meaning. It's in the context of a war. Tons of people pretend like it's a verse that commands Muslims to kill anyone who isn't a Muslim, which is absolutely false. Even in war, there are still rules one must adhere to. One of these rules is not killing women, children, the elderly or the sick, or somebody of another faith who is in their place of worship. It's just a fair thing to do, when you have a contract with "the enemy" and "the enemy" breaches this contract, it is only logical and understandable that if attacked, one should be able to murder "the enemy." It is violence in response to violence. It's not unwarranted violence, what a lot of people seem to think.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 350
  6. 351
  7. 352
  8. 353
  9. 354
  10. 355
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top