User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 19
  6. 20
  7. 21
  8. 22
  9. 23
  10. 24
  11. ...
  12. 58
  13. 59
  14. 60
  15. 61

Posts by Sweet

  1. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Good example of a logic fail…didn't read but says it's not relevant



    Where's Obbe's "ostrich head in the sand pic"

    Didn't read this either
  2. Sweet African Astronaut
    I don't even think she's actually autistic. That's not an excuse for being a stupid bitch. Autistic people can be cool but actual auts don't enjoy leaning on their 'tism.

    Autism is a standard excuse for boring shitheels.
  3. Sweet African Astronaut
    Neural interfaces are a dead end IMO. Stupid idea tbh. At least when we are talking outside of a medical context. I will call it now, there is literally zero chance of any neural interface related technology gaining any long term traction amongst any consumer tech within our lifetimes.

    I've thought about this for a while too, while following both technologies like neuralink as well as consumer end wearable computing.

    Google Glass was the big "lightbulb moment" for me that this AR, VR shit, any sort of neural bullshit, will never gain any adoption. The reason is because Android Wear (now WearOS) exists as well as Apple's WatchOS. And already smart watches are really stretching the limits of justifying their own price tags as companion devices. Their hardware aspect is the exact same as a smaller, cheaper phone than your main phone. They will become almost like earbuds, a common accessory item to phones, because they only have a limited performance threshold they need to perform their basic function as a companion device, convenient micro-interactions with your phone. But they'll advance faster and be more exciting, with as broad a range of products available as earbuds.

    The future will basically just be your phone being your main computational "hub" and then you will have a companion device that can communicate with it more conveniently for micro interactions.

    We are already on that track but wearable software is just still too immature.

    With this arrangement, you will have a huge high resolution screen and beefy processor and radios, cameras etc available in your pocket when you want to do any actual media consumption or work or whatever. And a companion device for basic notification based interactions with it that will cover like 99% of your "walking around" use cases.

    And if you want VR, all the tech will just be loaded into one of these formats that can be easily sold and gotten rid of if you want.

    Technology moves too fast and the security risks are too high for anyone to insert wires into their brain to do basic shit with.

    Even now with Neuralink many employees and former employees have complained it is being run like a fast paced tech startup rather than what it is, an emerging medical technology that requires a shitload of careful, gradual, thorough development.

    Neural interfaces will probably be super valuable for helping handicapped people restore function etc but it will never be successful for just shitting around in VR or whatever, or other general consumer stuff.
  4. Sweet African Astronaut
    Certainly can't read a room
  5. Sweet African Astronaut
    No
  6. Sweet African Astronaut
    I'm neither smeagle nor octato
  7. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ember McLain

    thats actually the color of spoiled food. Cooked foods are a MELTING POT of colors, one color uniform brown means it's off.

    of course this has nothing to do with race and everyone knows mixed race is a cope by lower castes trying to fit into higher caste society especially when they start justifying racial issues with the color of foods

    Nah Millard reaction = browning, the colour brown is literally fundamental to all delicious food.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction/

    The Maillard reaction (/maɪˈjɑːr/ my-YAR; French: [majaʁ]) is a chemical reaction between amino acids and reducing sugars that gives browned food its distinctive flavor. Seared steaks, fried dumplings, cookies and other kinds of biscuits, breads, toasted marshmallows, and many other foods undergo this reaction. It is named after French chemist Louis Camille Maillard, who first described it in 1912 while attempting to reproduce biological protein synthesis.[1][2] The reaction is a form of non-enzymatic browning which typically proceeds rapidly from around 140 to 165 °C (280 to 330 °F). Many recipes call for an oven temperature high enough to ensure that a Maillard reaction occurs.[3] At higher temperatures, caramelization (the browning of sugars, a distinct process) and subsequently pyrolysis (final breakdown leading to burning and the development of acrid flavors) become more pronounced.

    Of course whites and yellows are so jealous of the beauty of the brown skin tone that they'll try to associate the colour with the downcycle waste byproduct of eating and living life. Like trying to associate the colour red with the littering of Coke cans rather than roses.

    That's the kind of blindness racial ignorance brings, where foolish people can delude themselves into thinking something unambiguously good is actually bad.
  8. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ember McLain Black*

    hence why everyone uses whitener even when they run out of milk (like I am currently)
    Actually I have milk but I keep using this shite for some reason


    Nah it's dark brown to begin with but most people lighten it to a lovely golden brown, like the beautiful skin of people from the subcontinent.

    Robusta = Africans, Arabica = Middle Easterners

    Beautiful rich bold brown coffee, like the most beautiful of skin colours.
  9. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny cooked and digested food.

    no wonder dalits shits all over their street.

    "its a good thing"


    Even healthy urine isn't yellow, it's only the really bad stinky piss that's yellow like the mongoloid skin.
  10. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ember McLain *cringes eternally *
    tRIGGER ME NIGGER someones overdosing on copium here folks

    You seem upset.
  11. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson COPE

    ^ See how that works?


    Great example of cope context^
  12. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Kafka I'm getting a nose job. (Not rn but I've set up an initial appointment).

    It's called a rhinoplasty, you need it because you're as ugly as a rhino.
  13. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ember McLain 🦖🔋 WARNING: THIS POST WAS GENERATED USING ADVANCED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY 🤖💥
    If the Matrix was created without the use of AI and instead done crudely and jankily, it's possible that it would still use a programming language like C++ or Assembly, which are commonly used for developing high-performance applications.

    However, without the use of AI, the creation of a fully immersive virtual reality experience would be much more challenging and would likely require a great deal of manual programming and scripting. This would involve creating complex algorithms and code to simulate the various sensory experiences, such as touch, taste, and smell, as well as the physics of the virtual environment.

    Additionally, the lack of AI would mean that the Matrix would not be able to adapt and learn from the behavior of its users, making it less realistic and potentially less immersive. Without advanced algorithms and machine learning capabilities, the virtual reality experience would likely be limited in its complexity and sophistication.

    Overall, while it's possible to create a crude and janky version of the Matrix using existing programming languages, the lack of advanced AI capabilities would make it much more challenging and limit its overall effectiveness and realism.

    Didn't read
  14. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson That's a real world answer…

    You know how a hollow point works right?…it DESTROYS material…a beanbag doesn't.

    You put a hollow point in someone's head their brain is immediately turned to mush…there is no "oh let me keep going" capability from that.

    You shoot someone with a beanbag in the head, you temporarily stun them…but a stunned person can recover quickly and still pose a threat.

    …the goal here is to STOP the threat..and permanently.

    Playing devil's advocate, lets say a beanbag has a 98% chance of saving you from harm…and a bullet had a 99% chance…are you willing to risk your life for 1%?

    If so you go ahead and keep your beanbags, I (like the cops and military and anyone with any sense) will keep using guns.

    Didn't read, not relevant to discussion whatsoever. Go back to playing Shooty of Dooty on Xbox or whatever kid. You know nothing about firearms.
  15. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson A hollow point to the head will top you immediately and forever…a beanbag wont always.

    We are discussing real world best practice, not strategies from zombie movies and video games.
  16. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    ^ see how that works…

    Great example, you used it as a cope for having no response again.
  17. Sweet African Astronaut
    John Sled
  18. Sweet African Astronaut
    Mongoloids hate being yellow, they know it's the colour of piss and vomit, universally recognized as bad things, whereas brown is the colour of cooked food, universally recognized as a good thing.
  19. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson again laughable.

    Please post your data which shows several beanbags is just as effective at stopping someone was several hollow point are.

    No need because it's totally irrelevant to the issue under discussion.
  20. Sweet African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson If a perp CHOOSES to challenge someone pointing a gun at them…the resulting action taken is on them.

    "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes" etc.

    Completely irrelevant to whether handguns have any advantage in terms of immediate incapacitation (they don't).
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 19
  6. 20
  7. 21
  8. 22
  9. 23
  10. 24
  11. ...
  12. 58
  13. 59
  14. 60
  15. 61
Jump to Top