User Controls

Posts by LmaoJunkies

  1. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by CandyRein Didn’t read

    You look like a whore, Tara.
  2. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Over 100,000 deaths so far, and hundreds of thousands of permanent injuries. Healthy people, with no comorbidities. Dead. Just hours, days or weeks after injecting the experimental scary science thing vaccine. The mass-murderers-for-profit can't be sued. They have zero oversight. Zero liability. Making trillions of dollars for themselves. Motive. Means. And opportunity. Feel like getting dead? Just follow the tears. Follow the fears. But nobody hears.


    https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

    ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE HAD PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS

    wAIT

    HOSPITALS FILLING UP WITH PEOPLE DYING FROM THE VACCINE

    Oh

    Fucking WwAAAIIT
  3. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by aldra do you have a reading compr'ehension problem or something

    nobody said anything about 'flipping sides', it was comparing the military trajectory of the Taliban to ISIS, which at the time was being groomed as a weapon in the service of US interests in the middle east. it would be very difficult for the Taliban to be used in the same way though, because they've already reached out (diplomatically) to competing interests after 20 years of the US hunting them down and ruining their country.

    So now you're backtracking lmao.

    Keep reading those sweet red letters my little retarded Aussie
  4. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Sophie Incest is ok.
    Israel shouldn't exist.

    Other than that she's a lunatic.

    Nah she's pretty chill.

    You can immediately tell who the racist people are because they bring her up all the time. Same with AOC.
  5. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by Netflxchillr dang dude! i posted those^^ almost two years ago… how far back you go? to get that!

    but hey- here's what i've got on tday.

    lhttps://imgur.com/a/8aMcBHJ

    pretty plain jane- but they'll the job done!

    OH MY GOD LOL

    what the fuck is wrong with your feet and hands? They look like fucking cottage cheese hahahahaha
  6. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by AngryIVer Even as a Trump supporter I seriously fucking doubt it. He won't get re-elected in 2024 either no matter how hard we push for it.

    You are the first Trump supporter I have seen that is willing to admit it lol.

    He doesn't have the support even among Republicans. Because he's shit, and you're an idiot for supporting him.

    But hey even a broken clock is right twice a day
  7. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by stl1 The New York Times
    In a Milestone, Schumer Will Propose Federal Decriminalization of Marijuana
    Nicholas Fandos


    WASHINGTON — Senator Chuck Schumer of New York plans to propose legislation on Wednesday to decriminalize marijuana at the federal level, putting his weight as majority leader behind a growing movement to unwind the decades-old war on drugs.

    The cannabis bill faces an uphill climb in the Senate.

    The draft bill, called the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, would remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act and begin regulating and taxing it, placing federal rules on a burgeoning industry that has faced years of uncertainty. Though states would still be allowed to set their own marijuana laws, businesses and individuals in states that have legalized its use would be free for the first time to sell and consume it without the risk of federal punishment.

    The proposal would also try to make recompense to communities of color and the poor for damage from years of restrictive federal drug policy. It calls for immediately expunging nonviolent marijuana-related arrests and convictions from federal records and would earmark new tax revenue for restorative justice programs intended to lift up communities affected by “the failed federal prohibition of cannabis.”

    The bill aims to “finally turn the page on this dark chapter in American history and begin righting these wrongs,” said Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, who wrote the bill with Mr. Schumer and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon and the chairman of the Finance Committee.

    The legislation faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where Republicans are opposed, and it is unlikely to become law in the near future. President Biden has not endorsed it, and some moderate Democrats are likely to balk at the implications of decriminalizing a drug that has been policed and stigmatized for so long.

    But in the arc of the public’s rapid reconsideration of marijuana laws, the presentation on Wednesday was a remarkable milestone for legalization proponents. The suggestion that the Senate’s top leader and the chairman of the powerful Finance Committee would sponsor major decriminalization legislation would have been fantastical in the not-too-distant past.

    In a speech on April 20, the unofficial holiday for marijuana smokers, Mr. Schumer said he was trying to prod Washington off the sidelines of a debate in which much of the country was already engaged. Public opinion polling suggests that nearly 70 percent of Americans support legalizing marijuana. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical use, and 18 states plus D.C. allow recreational use by adults.

    Mr. Schumer has also made no secret that he believes Democrats stand to benefit politically from embracing the legalization push, particularly with young voters.

    “Hopefully, the next time this unofficial holiday of 4/20 rolls around, our country will have made progress in addressing the massive overcriminalization of marijuana in a meaningful and comprehensive way,” he said in April.

    The senators were expected to detail their plans later Wednesday morning at a news conference at the Capitol.

    They are expected to propose empowering the Food and Drug Administration and the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau at the Treasury Department to begin regulating the production, distribution and sale of marijuana, removing the Drug Enforcement Administration from its current oversight role. Among other implications, the changes would allow marijuana companies already operating in states where it is legal to gain full access to the United States banking system.

    The legislation would gradually institute a federal excise tax like the one on alcohol and tobacco sales, eventually as high as 25 percent for big businesses, allowing the federal government to benefit from sales that came close to $20 billion in 2020. The revenue would then be funneled back to communities most affected by federal drug policy and to fund expanded medical research into cannabis that is currently limited by its status as a controlled substance.

    One provision, for instance, would establish a cannabis justice office at the Justice Department to help fund job training, legal aid and help with re-entry after incarceration. Another program would promote loans to small cannabis businesses owned by members of racially or economically marginalized groups to try to ensure that communities that suffered disproportionately under the war on drugs are not left out of the gold rush that has accompanied legalization.

    But the bill would aim to make other, more direct attempts to compensate for the impacts of years of aggressive policing. In addition to expunging past arrests and convictions, it would entitle those who are currently serving sentences for nonviolent federal drug crime to a court hearing to reconsider their sentences. And if enacted, the federal government would no longer be able to discriminate against marijuana users seeking federal housing, food or health benefits.

    The Democratic-led House passed similar legislation in December, with a handful of Republicans joining to vote in favor. The vote was the first and only time either chamber had endorsed the legalization of cannabis, but the bill died at the end of the last Congress. House leaders plan to pass an updated version in the coming months.

    Passage through the Senate is likely to be more tricky. Mr. Schumer would need to assemble 60 votes, meaning he would need the support of at least 10 Republicans. Though libertarian-leaning Republicans have generally supported ending the prohibition of marijuana, party leaders are likely to oppose the Democrats’ plan, particularly with its emphasis on restorative justice and government intervention in the cannabis industry.

    But opposition is not limited to Republicans. Mr. Schumer would have to persuade moderate Democrats who are uncomfortable with the implications of decriminalization to support it.

    Mr. Biden supports decriminalizing marijuana and pulling back the war on drugs, but his views are generally more conservative than many Democrats’ and he has not endorsed Mr. Schumer’s proposal. His White House made headlines this spring for pushing out five staff members over their use of marijuana.

    One of many reasons to vote Democrat
  8. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by POLECAT i been fooled before,, I don't think i'm gettin fooled this time,, I guess I could be but I don't think so

    I am sure Trump will regain presidency any minute now...
  9. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by hydromorphone I fuck everything up eventually

    Still homeless?

    Still addicted to heroin?

    Still without custody of your kid?

    lmao
  10. LmaoJunkies Yung Blood
    Originally posted by aldra the national government is abandoning its positions and leaving equipment behind in exactly the same way that the Iraqi military did when ISIS rolled through; in that case there were rumours that they were getting orders from above not to fight or destroy equipment to intentionally allow ISIS to grow in strength.

    if that's the case here it may be that the Taliban was meant to be groomed as a regional force in the same way, but they're already making overtures to diplomatic agreements with Russia and China. there's evidence that Ughyir separatists have been armed and trained in Afghanistan, then funneled back to China and Central Asia but it's hard to say whether the Taliban was involved or even supports it - they're similar ideologically, but given the last 20 years they're unlikely to knowingly do ANYTHING that contributes to US interests

    It's laughable to think they're 'flipping sides' here.

    The Taliban will do what is best for the Taliban.

    Stop reading Chinese/Russian propaganda online. The Taliban are only trying to establish legitimacy.

    Afghanistan doesn't really contribute much to the interests of any nation
Jump to Top