User Controls
Thanked Posts by Solomon Thunder
-
2021-04-09 at 3:17 AM UTC in What are you thinking about....Nicotine is lameThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-04-09 at 5:40 PM UTC in DMX dead at 50
-
2021-04-04 at 5:02 AM UTC in What are you thinking about....Hitting the gymThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-23 at 6:45 PM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-23 at 6:54 PM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.
Originally posted by aldra pan-genocide is a valid topic
what would you like to discuss? preferably something unrelated to niggers or niggertry as that's not a topic I'm comfortable with
The most fundamental rule of the universe is for entropy to increase and disorder to reign, for all structure to dissolve into heat.
The basic moral motivation of life is to (locally) decrease entropy and increase order.
Thus life is at odds with the basic will of reality and existence itself. The effort is futile, Absurd and contradictory.
To serve the highest meaning, life must be minimized in the universe to the point that it eliminated. We cannot do so for all the universe without risking perpetuating life itself. Thus we must eliminate all life on Earth, as that is the maximal progress we can achieve towards the goal of minimizing life in the universe as quickly as possible.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-03-23 at 1:55 AM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-18 at 12:42 PM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.
-
2021-03-18 at 7:45 PM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.
-
2021-03-18 at 4:12 AM UTC in I'm want to kill all life on Earth.The cold crystalline beauty of the cosmic machine does not need the flower of life blossoming within, festering with bugs that do nothing but procreate and consume, deconstructing it bit by pristine bit to turn into excrement and plastic bullshit.
I wish to develop a nuclear propulsion rocket that can reach relativistic speeds and send it on a journey of constant acceleration around the solar system, building up kinetic energy till on impact, it could shatter the moon.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-03-17 at 1:12 PM UTC in What are you thinking about....Every time a white tries to talk about IQ on the internet, it's because they are ashamed of their weak physiology. It is literally like a nerd getting shoved into a locker then going home to call his bullies "ignoramuses" on the internet.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-17 at 1:42 AM UTC in What are you thinking about....Blacks are on average stronger than whitesThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-17 at 1:40 AM UTC in This forum = Pure hatred for one another
Originally posted by Kev torment them with your success.
Por que no los dos?why are they worth a solitary thought? if you allow them to consume your time beyond that, they win. we can cut them, we can torture them but in the end they win, because its proof they fucked us up beyond repair.
You know what sounds like someone damaged you for life?
Actively not doing something because you think it will result in some abstract win for the other guy in your head. That sounds like they mentally affected your behaviour so hard that you'll never fuck with them again.
In fact it is exactly the kind of rationalization someone who got beaten and has no chance of vengeance would give.
Instead, just coldly destroy their lives for fun. Can't you just enjoy inflicting suffering?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-03-15 at 2:53 PM UTC in This forum = Pure hatred for one anotherHating people is a waste of energy that could be better spent hurting them coldly for entertainment.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-02-28 at 1:23 AM UTC in This forum = Pure hatred for one anotherI'm not a racist. Racism is a crime and crimes are for niggers.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-13 at 1:56 AM UTC in What are you thinking about....Beatin' 'n' rapin', that's what's on my mind, beatin' 'n' rapin'The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-12 at 5:56 PM UTC in What are you thinking about....Raping men
-
2021-03-12 at 1:49 AM UTC in Chauvin's Going to WalkRace is such a boring subject. There really ain't shit to say about it except low level shit slinging.
-
2021-03-12 at 4:08 AM UTC in What are you thinking about....Beating women.
-
2021-03-12 at 4:07 AM UTC in Chauvin's Going to WalkThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-11 at 8:35 PM UTC in Chauvin's Going to Walk
Originally posted by netstat do you think the dichotomy is between 'free' and paid content? was thinking about the problem of shitty online journalism recently and had the idea that it largely comes down to incentives, where 'free' publications want to churn out clickbait type bullshit that is quick, easy and epistemically irresponsible because this incentivises faster consumption, more clicks and therefore more potential advertising revenue, while people who are willing to pay for a subscription to something like the economist are more likely to want higher quality, more factually accurate investigative journalism and the writers aren't weighed down as much by the need to optimise around the publication's advertising strategy
Maybe indirectly but it comes down to the actual ability of the writers, vs "bloggers".
You know how I navigate free news articles I see on the web? I immediately hunt for and click on the source. It will take me to an outlet or scientific or academic source. If not, I hunt for the sources on that source and then click that. Eventually I enhancement down to a paper or something that I read myself and is usually what I actually need to inform myself. Even if I don't specifically understand all the figures, I can carefully read what the authors are conveying and see what they're actually trying to say better than most of the articles by "bloggers" that got me to it in the first place.
If you regularly read any scientific news or economics news articles on the internet, it will drive you to the brink of insanity how much "rephrase wikipedia basic definition" word count padding bullshit you see.
In fact often you will spot blatant falsehoods that you genuinely already know are wrong and betrays the author's utter lack of specific knowledge on the subject.
There are some shining examples even amongst free publications, such as Quanta Magazine for scientific news.
When I read a publication like The Economist, it is clear that the authors usually at least basically know their shit. I don't see too many stilted takes. They don't just blog summaries of some new papers, they will write a broader survey of rich topics that help you gain some basic understanding and set yourself up to do further research on your own with a solid relative foundation.
If you can get talented writers with actual knowledge of the subjects you're hoping to cover, the business model doesn't really matter.
