User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Lanny
-
2016-11-23 at 2:20 AM UTC in RisiR vs Malice Streetfight FundWhere's Bling at? I'm guna need his help for this opThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-23 at 1:28 AM UTC in RisiR vs Malice Streetfight Fund
Originally posted by reject Apparently Germany didn't quite get all the jedis back in the 40s
-
2016-11-23 at 1:21 AM UTC in RisiR vs Malice Streetfight Fundwho the fuck pays 50k for windows you total spasticThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-22 at 8:43 PM UTC in The retarded thread: Fuck, §m£ÂgØL made one first edition
Originally posted by Lanny Yup, starving to death in the winter, being eaten by the myriad of lethal wildlife, killing eachother over tribal dickmesuring, and dying in your 30s because your medical practice consists of eating various barks sure would be great for all those poor native americans with a state granted monopoly on one of the most profitable industries in the country.
American genocide of the native americans was definitely morally wrong, but I think we've done about as much apologizing as is ever going to do anyone any good and I challenge you to point out what part of this country's policy regarding indian land constitutes confining anyone to a "neon zoo".
Calm down, homie. Either I can't read the comedic tone in your post or you took me serious before. The fuck's wrong with you? Fuck the Indians.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-22 at 6:44 PM UTC in Being a people helperBill Krozby I just said I wondered about those things. I didn't say that that's probably what happened. I didn't say that referring to us as stallions was wrong; I wanted to know what it's all about. I'm one of the most positive guys in space despite the world of shit that I live in.
Yes you're correct technically it is still double penetration. We all knew what I meant. Neither of us fucked her ass and our cock and balls never had to make any contact with one another. I guess if that's lame then that's lame. I hope you have better luck with yours and may there be much interaction between all of your respective genitalia. I'll be rooting for you, silently, from afar. Think of me while your two cocks are sliding against each other. Remember my smiling face and my pink beanie. :D
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-22 at 6:41 PM UTC in Critical thinking is a rare skill
Originally posted by greenplastic Really, it seems so simple, and is probably very prevalent amongst the userbase here because most of us live alternate lifestyles, but the vast majority of people out there are completely unable to think critically about anything. And it's becoming more and more that way every day. People are now used to buzzfeed and facebook feeding them their opinions. No one even bothers to try to read unbiased news anymore, they just believe whatever the fuck they are told to. Literally.
So being able to look at something and have a pretty accurate gauge of whether it's bullshit or not is rare, and very valuable. People are so easily manipulated, you could use it to your advantage in a million different ways. It's just up to you to come up with them.
Originally posted by greenplastic literally nobody cares that you are a degenerate with slightly above average intelligence. a lot of us are the same way, and you don't see us making these self indulgent posts
I'm going to destroy you with ease, boy. Hahaha...
So, it's ok for you to toot your own special snowflake super critical thinking horn but when UM posts about having to deal with dumb shit he is boasting. Ok, gotcha.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-22 at 6:06 PM UTC in agronym its not fukcing NISYea, wow, great. A super lame troll.
-
2016-11-22 at 5:47 PM UTC in agronym its not fukcing NIS
Originally posted by littleasianlady Hello.
I was watching TV drama called IRIS. Then I was watching sequel called IRIS II.
It is about fictional South Korean intelligence agency called NSS.
Real South Korean intelligence agency is called NIS.
*gasp*
*OMG*
IRIS.. IRIS II...ISIS..RisiR... NIS..NNS....
Better get on your knees and solve that puzzle, girl. You are literally so close to figuring it out.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-22 at 1:28 PM UTC in Critical thinking is a rare skillYou're specialThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-22 at 6:41 AM UTC in How should I cope with stress and still be productive?
Originally posted by Bill Krozby you sound like a 14 year old high on cough syrup.
You sound like a 30 year old deadbeat alcoholic with Schizophrenia who neglects his family and thinks he's some kind of edgy rebel while the rest of the world looks down on him in disgust wondering how such a level of failure is even attainable.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-21 at 2:09 PM UTC in My favorite picture of 2015.(No lolis, promise)
Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump Thank you very much.
don't take it, it's a white rectangle, not nothingThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-21 at 5:59 AM UTC in Social experiment: being nice to women for 1 month.only on NIS is not being a piece of shit for a short period considered a 'social experiment'The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-20 at 11:31 PM UTC in Battlestations Thread
Originally posted by Malice You are utterly repulsive, Bill Krozby. My stomach churns when I am unfortunate enough to come across any picture of you. I can only imagine the putrid stench that emanates from you.
'oh a photo thread better post a picture with my cock out again' you enormous faggot.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-20 at 11:29 PM UTC in Battlestations ThreadYou are utterly repulsive, Bill Krozby. My stomach churns when I am unfortunate enough to come across any picture of you. I can only imagine the putrid stench that emanates from your foul corpulent body.
Post last edited by Malice at 2016-11-21T03:02:18.913577+00:00The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-20 at 11:25 PM UTC in Hey Lan your antiCSRF middleware token crap is cramping my proxy posting style.So apparently i am getting a 302 on the thanks button when my proxy tries to send the request.
If this is just my proxy being ghey, why does it only do this on the thanks button.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-20 at 1:22 AM UTC in are you uglyIs it bad that the person who has the least need for a good figure here shames us all?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-20 at 1:16 AM UTC in User titlesAs bad as our parents feel about us, at least they never had to look at pictures of us huffing shitThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2016-11-19 at 6:33 PM UTC in Mathematics
Originally posted by Lanny In general I lean nominalist and while that doesn't totally commit one to believing mathematics is invented rather than discovered it lends itself to that conclusion and it is my general inclination. I watched a walk by Philip Wadler and he made this argument about how three or four mathematicians seemed to independently discover the decidability problem and that that was an argument for a discovery model of mathematics. Wadler is a really smart guy but I thought that was kind of a disingenuous move, it fails to acknowledge the distinction between axioms and theorems, the decidability problem is the product of systems in which it emerges, yes we may "discover" new properties of a formal system as in this case but that discovery is predicated on the invention of the system to start with. I'll claim that nothing which is discovered can be fully reduced to invented parts (I recently discovered my phone has a "do not disturb" feature, that's not an argument that my phone or that feature are discovered properties of the universe rather than something invented).
I agree up to a certain point with you. I'm more of an intuitionist than a platonist myself, and I think that axioms are invented and theorems are discovered within the structural limits drawn by the design of the axioms, which is basically what undecidability is all about (I guess that the three mathematicians you were talking about are godel, emil post and turing). So, for instance, working in number theory using the peano axioms rather than the presburger arithmetic is a whole different thing, and that's what I think has been the finishing blow to platonism: the fact that there are undecidable statements within a system implies that there's not such a thing as a perfect bijective function between the mind and the so called perfect platonic realm. Actually, I don't see much difference between religion and platonism since the last one asks for a blind faith in the aforementioned hyperuranion and it makes sense from an historic perspective since platonism stems from the pythagorean mysticism.
One might naturally make some argument from isomorphisms between our mathematics and the world as being evidence that mathematical systems are founded in natural, discovered elements of the world. But this fails too, to model the world post-hoc is not to be discovered. Consider natural languages model the world yet no one would claim that English was "discovered". Likewise the relationship of mathematics to the world is an intentional product of its genesis, it contains similar structures not because it is similar to the world but because it exists to model it.
However I find your critics of the analogy with the "do not disturb" phone feature kinda fallacious. The designers of a phone will know (virtually) every property of the phone they're developing, so there will be nothing to discover. But mathematics is on a whole different level of complexity. When cantor single-handedly created set theory he could have not predicted that the continuum hypothesis is undecidable, so this is something that has been "discovered" by paul cohen, but of course it was already a sort of "built-in feature" of axiomatic space they were working on. I dunno, man, it's fucked up and I'm getting confused, but I'd go as far as to say that the very fact that when you invent a system you cannot virtually know every property means that then everything else from that point forth is discovered.
About isomorphism between math and the real world, those are discovered too and since I think that the so called "pure mathematics" is an hoax and doesn't exist (fuck that faggot of harold hardy), I infer that every mathematical model will eventually be linked to something in the real world (that doesn't necessarily imply the opposite): for instance, category theory, which is known as the most abstract field of math, has been proved useful in many real-world fields (computational linguistics, sorting algorithms, AI and so on): ah, with real-world applications I talk about things that are discovered (such as new physics shit) and things that are invented (such as computer science stuff, artificial intelligence, automata theory). So math could be invented and sometimes only used for other things that have been invented and not discovered. Sounds very autistic.
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger Does the mind have no mathematical properties? Is there any way we could define it as a mathematical object? If I was a smarter man I would say perhaps but all I can say now is I don't know.
Yeah I think we could define the mind as a mathematical object and eventually we will in a much more rigorous way. But we do now by now is that the mind is not a turing machine because we do not crash by bumping into the halting problem when we reason around undecidable statements (at least we can prove that they undecidable, a computer cannot)The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-19 at 12:02 PM UTC in Note how women like horror movies more than guys.
Originally posted by Enter Why would girls make up the majority of posters on saw forums when the only reason they watch the movies is so their bf will put their arm around them?
Because the majority of people that would watch something that insipid would be the type that pretend to be female on the internet -
2016-11-18 at 4:11 PM UTC in I got hit on by a teller
Originally posted by Enter Yes, but how so?
Do you think scuba-divers like Italian food?
Yes or noThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
