User Controls
Hebephilia thread
-
2024-09-23 at 3:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bradley threads like this make me feel bad for our community and the members in it.
Sophie actually had some really good arguments that were written before cancel culture existed and I think his arguments still hold water in this modern climate of migtows and cultura wars but that being said I think he truly did die because the thoughts on a lot of things like Libertarianism and Lolirock Philosophy are at different stages now and his arguments are kinda outdated but I think still better than "LOL U LIKE 16 YER GIRL YOU PEDOPHILE = BAD!!!!" even the DH tards were a bit more nuanced than that
https://niggasin.space/thread/89579
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I think libertarian/ancap philosophy died sometime during the birth of AI and i'm wondering where he would stand in this current technological climate
Originally posted by Sophie Sophie's top anarchism book recommendation of the day is Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society. By Gary Chartier. In which Chartier argues the fundamental immorality of the state. His neo-Thomist views on natural law are controversial and not an adequate theory of ethics in my opinion and his anti-utilitarian stance and attempts to undermine the public goods argument for the state are sure to piss Lanny off. And, are at best unpalatable to a more rationalist view of the state of things. Where he shines however is in his application of legal order in a stateless society. There is a long literature on how the common law or merchant law developed and was enforced without state assistance. Chartier cites an important literature in experimental economics which provides evidence that assurance contracts can solve the problem of public goods. He cites arguments and cases in legal theory that may tend to show that tort law can be as good or perhaps better than top-down state-enforced regulation.
All in all, an interesting philosophical work, the best part of which arguing for the Capitalist part of Anarcho-Capitalism.
7.2/10 Would recommend. -
2024-09-23 at 5:30 PM UTC
-
2024-09-23 at 8:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I'm seeing a girl my age currently since my hebephilia is primary but not exclusive, i make exceptions for attractive girls my age. So we were talking about sexuality and whatnot and i often 'joked' when we were out and their was a cute loli about how attractive i found her. So i told her; what if i wasn't actually joking? She said well, you can't help what you're attracted too and i agreed with her. After that i 'confessed' i actually am attracted to girls of the younger persuasion and she said: That's perfectly fine, you don't go around raping children anyway and if we ever split up and you find a cute loli willing to be your lgf just make sure everything is consensual. She even apoligized for not being younger lol but did ask me not to leave her for a cute 13 year old.
Needless to say i was surprised at her position regadring this but came to the conclusion my GF is pretty awesome.
hebephilia doesn't exist. 13 year olds can get pregnant
The reason victorian england had to invent laws making it illegal was because people kept identifying as hebephiles and saying this kind of behavior was normal instead of just getting a 13 year old pregnant and spending the rest of your life with her until you die at the ripe oldje age of 33. Humans were biologically designed for this. We aren't supposed to be 100 years old and be migtows in our 20s, feminists are wrong
/ thread -
2024-09-23 at 8:49 PM UTCI want a friend
-
2024-09-23 at 9:04 PM UTCall philias don't exist. They are inventions of the hebrew to control the white man
-
2024-09-23 at 9:05 PM UTCYeah yeah take your medsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-23 at 9:31 PM UTC
The claim that "all philias don't exist" seems to reflect a dismissal of certain desires or orientations as non-existent or morally invalid, aligning more with Warcry's stance within a specific moral framework. However, this depends on the broader context and values that guide one's interpretation of human desires.
yes. Hebephilia is not morally invalid and cannot be argued for because it does not exist
uncle ted would classify this as a surrogate activity. Real humans surviving in the woods and that aren't brainwashed by society and live a true decentralized tribal society don't have "philes"The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-09-23 at 9:47 PM UTCHezbollah > Hebephilia
-
2024-09-23 at 9:47 PM UTCThis thread gives me the Hebegibilias
-
2024-09-23 at 9:51 PM UTCthis website does not need cute and funny threads 馃挗
-
2024-09-23 at 9:54 PM UTC
The concept of "philia," from which terms like *necrophilia*, *pedophilia*, and *zoophilia* derive, has ancient roots in Western language and thought, particularly in ancient Greek philosophy. "Philia" (蠁喂位委伪) in Greek simply means "love" or "friendship" and was one of several words the Greeks used to describe different forms of love or affection, including *eros* (romantic/erotic love) and *agape* (spiritual or selfless love). The use of "philia" to denote different kinds of affection or attraction has evolved over time.
Everything after this is jedi
Classical Roots
In ancient Greece, the term *philia* was used broadly to refer to affection between friends, family members, or even towards one's country. The philosopher Aristotle, in his *Nicomachean Ethics*, discusses *philia* extensively, exploring different kinds of friendships and bonds that define human life. However, this early usage of *philia* was largely neutral and positive, focusing on the virtues of human relationships and affection.
It was not until later that the term *philia* began to be applied more narrowly to describe specific forms of attraction or desire, some of which were considered morally dubious or pathological.
Latin Influence and the Middle Ages
As Latin became the dominant language of scholarship and theology in the Roman Empire and medieval Europe, many Greek concepts, including "philia," were translated and adapted into Latin. However, in medieval Europe, the focus was more on theological discussions of sin, virtue, and morality rather than cataloging or naming specific desires or attractions in the way we see with modern terms like *pedophilia* or *necrophilia*.
The language of desire and attraction in the Middle Ages was more likely to be couched in terms of sin (such as *luxuria*, or lust) or virtue, with clear moral overtones, influenced heavily by Christian doctrine. Discussions of "disordered" or "unnatural" desires existed but were framed within the context of religious and moral philosophy rather than as distinct psychological or pathological categories.
Early Modern Era (1500s+)
It was during the Renaissance and Enlightenment (from the 1500s onward) that Western thought began to engage more deeply with human psychology and sexuality in a more systematic way. Scientific inquiry, particularly in the fields of medicine, biology, and later psychology, brought about more specific terms to describe different forms of desire and attraction.
During this period, we begin to see more classification of different "philias" as pathological or deviant attractions, particularly in the 19th and early 20th centuries when psychology and psychiatry emerged as formal disciplines. For example:
- The term "necrophilia" (attraction to corpses) was coined in the 19th century by French doctor Joseph Guislain.
- "Pedophilia" (attraction to children) emerged as a term in the late 19th century with the development of psychiatry.
The Modern Era and the Development of Pathological Philias
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, there was a significant shift in how society classified and spoke about desire. Medical and psychological discourse began to pathologize certain attractions, classifying them as mental disorders or deviations from what was considered "normal" sexual behavior. This period saw the rise of terms like "sadism," "masochism," and the "philias," as part of efforts to understand and categorize human sexuality.
The term "philia" as a suffix indicating abnormal or pathological attraction (e.g., *zoophilia*, *pedophilia*) is relatively modern, developing primarily in the 19th century alongside the growth of psychology, psychiatry, and sexology.
Conclusion
The use of "philia" to describe various forms of love or attraction has ancient origins, going back to the Greeks. However, the specific application of "philia" to denote pathological or morally problematic desires (such as *pedophilia* or *necrophilia*) is a more modern development, emerging in the 19th century with the rise of scientific and psychological inquiry into human behavior. In earlier historical periods, language around desire and attraction was more likely to be moralistic, grounded in religious and philosophical discourse rather than in the medical or psychological terminology that dominates today. -
2024-09-23 at 9:56 PM UTCI know I said this thread Gave me the heebeegibblia but I don't know if that would be understood it was supposed to be a play on the word heebeegeebees meaning to be creeped out/given the heebeegeebees and was not an endorsement of the weird shit discussed by pedophiles in this thread
-
2024-09-23 at 9:57 PM UTCalso I've never seen so many adults defend having sex with kidsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-23 at 10:01 PM UTCphilias are artificial outdated inventions of western philosophy and this is evident because the word "Philia" / 蠁喂位委伪 has completely lost it's original Greek meaning.
People say "ALL ANCIENT GREEKS WERE PEDOPHILES" but actually they were the first Christians and the original bible was translated into Greek and i'm pretty sure if you went around claiming to be a "phile" type person people would think you are insane
-
2024-09-23 at 10:10 PM UTCmfw nobody can disagree with my probably flawed etymological arguments without taking the position as a person defending noncery
If you disagree with me you can be cancelled by culture therefore I am correct. Might = Right and morality is subjective to the culture of the time which means sophie was right all along actually -
2024-09-23 at 10:49 PM UTC
-
2024-09-23 at 11:45 PM UTCYeah that's a problem for adults who don't share that desire to be around. Sorry.
-
2024-09-23 at 11:48 PM UTCFuck off bradley, go do your job and suck nigger dick like you always do
-
2024-09-24 at 12:09 AM UTCWow right in my horsey hat heart
-
2024-09-24 at 12:35 AM UTC
