User Controls
The Friday Thread
-
2022-02-15 at 1:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Russia outclasses the US in terms of ICBMs, anti-air and anti-missile defences - have a look at the echelons of SAMs ringing Moscow and other major cities vs. the directional batteries the US employs. The only part of the US' nuclear triad that is going to be effective is the SLBMs.
The US has significant numbers advantages in terms of aircraft and superior ability to deploy anywhere in the world, but it's not going to matter a whole lot because any direct conflict will go to strategic weapons the moment one homeland or the other is threatened
errr ... idk mane.
US submarines are either defective or theyre built with olanned obsolescene.
they either lose their stealthness as had happened in north china sea recently or they run into stealth terrains in south china sea. -
2022-02-15 at 1:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny errr … idk mane.
US submarines are either defective or theyre built with olanned obsolescene.
they either lose their stealthness as had happened in north china sea recently or they run into stealth terrains in south china sea.
lul, there was that fucking retard woman in charge of steel tests for submarines too recently wasn't there
she thought the quality tests 'weren't important' so faked the tests for all newly-built submarines in the last 20 years or something
even if they are piles of shit (I don't think they are) and they're often manned by retards (I do think they are, see the 'undersea mountains' thing and what actually caused that freighter to collide with the fishing trawler a few years back) the US has a significant numbers advantage. they don't need it though, because even one submarine is very hard to find and can get close enough to major cities and installations to obliterate them with no warning -
2022-02-15 at 2:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra lul, there was that fucking retard woman in charge of steel tests for submarines too recently wasn't there
she thought the quality tests 'weren't important' so faked the tests for all newly-built submarines in the last 20 years or something
even if they are piles of shit (I don't think they are) and they're often manned by retards (I do think they are, see the 'undersea mountains' thing and what actually caused that freighter to collide with the fishing trawler a few years back) the US has a significant numbers advantage. they don't need it though, because even one submarine is very hard to find and can get close enough to major cities and installations to obliterate them with no warning
she thought the tests were "stupid".
https://niggasin.space/post/1470995
also i suspect affirmative action hirees are the root causes of these "incidences".
and isnt the one detected by the russians recently during their exercises a stealth sub ? -
2022-02-15 at 2:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready I wonder if in my LIfetime I will actually see enemy ships or jets, bomber planes or missiles coming at us.
What a weird vision that would be. I don't think they would blow up civilian homes right away. they would hit Airports, and tall office buildings and infrastructures like oil refinery and bridges. I hope Im not on a bridge if it happens. that would suck.
I doubt they would send in an invading ground force. unless they did it with China. who knows.
Makes me wonder if they're living here and waiting for instructions to put their uniforms on and grab their gear and hit the streets. what would happen? would they just spray civilians with gun fire or what.
things that make you go Hmmmmmmmm
You're a paranoid schizophrenic, stop thinking foreign countries are going to bomb your house -
2022-02-15 at 2:28 PM UTC
-
2022-02-15 at 2:30 PM UTCTaliban beat the US using long sticks with poop on the end...no need for subs, aircraft carriers and ICBMs
-
2022-02-15 at 2:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra lol NOWARNING
if I remember right the guy got caught selling RCs as MDMA and snitched hard
Really? I don't seem to recall that, not saying that it couldn't have happened
Main thing I remember about him is he had a theory that humans were created by an alien race visiting Earth and impregnating apes. -
2022-02-15 at 2:32 PM UTCI might have names mixed up but I'm pretty sure it was him. he posted a bunch of drug synth/extraction recipes?
-
2022-02-15 at 2:33 PM UTCI gave a dude methylone once who I knew often sold stuff at festivals, I told him to just sell it as methylone and not MDMA because people would test it there and he'd get his ass beat. Didn't listen to me and of course someone came back to him with a yellow marquis test and jumped him and took all his shit.
-
2022-02-15 at 2:34 PM UTC
-
2022-02-15 at 2:46 PM UTCYes you are all correct about Nowarning, he did not create his own syncans, he was one of the first to import them for research purposes. he was busted, as to whether he disappeared into the prison system or told on everyone and rode off into the sunset, i have no idea
for all i know he's still on our forums and just doesn't mention it, his method of writing was not overly unique but his knowledge of synthetic cannabinoids specifically mam2201 and am2201 were of note, but as no one discusses the importation or reserach of these chemical fertilizers, it would be impossible to know which one of us is him, is it you? is that why you brought him up? What made anyone think he was a snitch anyway?
>>>>Main thing I remember about him is he had a theory that humans were created by an alien race visiting Earth and impregnating apes.'
Ya it is called the annanuki theory. there's a good chance he's right, it was outlined heavily by zacharaia sitchin's 8 part book series
it's good as almost like a possibility that ties in a lot tof different stuff, unfortunately if there was a giant tenth planet in our solar system, it most certainlyw would've been discovered and leaked by one of the many governments that hide secrets unsuccessfully
Solstice, i also hav ea theory you were created by your mom being impregnated by an ape -
2022-02-15 at 2:47 PM UTC
-
2022-02-15 at 2:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny theyre using drones now.
if you could get access to their systems, you could feasibly use the data to track and target specific uber passengers and drivers via gps
I'm sure google and by extension, al'phabet, have access to a lot of that data simply by virtue of most of those ride share apps using google's mapping apis
***fuck off -
2022-02-16 at 12:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra if you could get access to their systems, you could feasibly use the data to track and target specific uber passengers and drivers via gps
I'm sure google and by extension, al'phabet, have access to a lot of that data simply by virtue of most of those ride share apps using google's mapping apis
***fuck off
and the constant captcha you have to deal with teaches the AI how to identify cars, trucks, traffic lights, bicycles and other essential targets. -
2022-02-16 at 12:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Russia outclasses the US in terms of ICBMs, anti-air and anti-missile defences - have a look at the echelons of SAMs ringing Moscow and other major cities vs. the directional batteries the US employs. The only part of the US' nuclear triad that is going to be effective is the SLBMs.
The US has significant numbers advantages in terms of aircraft and superior ability to deploy anywhere in the world, but it's not going to matter a whole lot because any direct conflict will go to strategic weapons the moment one homeland or the other is threatened
what if there was an agreement of No Tactical nor Strat Nukes. Just Conventional. just keeping it conventional? outside of a full ground force invasion into that of Moscow. then obvious the nukes would be used. they're not going to allow a ground force to force them out of power.
but an air and sea battle only. strictly keeping it conventional. but we know all cards are played, so can you agree to such a thing?
well, we have strict rules of No Biological or Chemical weapons used in Battle. Nukes technically are a chemical weapon. reactionary to two elements or more coming together. I dunno.
they cause cancer too. you're not supposed to use weapons that have an everlasting affect on the body.
can it be considered off limits in war? -
2022-02-16 at 1:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready what if there was an agreement of No Tactical nor Strat Nukes. Just Conventional. just keeping it conventional? outside of a full ground force invasion into that of Moscow. then obvious the nukes would be used. they're not going to allow a ground force to force them out of power.
but an air and sea battle only. strictly keeping it conventional. but we know all cards are played, so can you agree to such a thing?
Why would either side limit themselves in such a way? Both the US and Russia, as well as most European countries and China reserve the right to use nuclear weapons if their own territorial integrity is being compromised as part of their nuclear posture.
The US maintains a 'first strike' policy in order to 'decapitate' the enemy before they can escalate to nuclear and Russia maintains a 'last strike' policy meant to automatically obliterate the enemy if their nuclear deterrent or command structure is damaged.
Sure we can talk about conventional warfare if you're interested in wargames and the like, but open conflict between two or more 'great powers' will escalate beyond that very quickly.
Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready well, we have strict rules of No Biological or Chemical weapons used in Battle. Nukes technically are a chemical weapon. reactionary to two elements or more coming together. I dunno.
they cause cancer too. you're not supposed to use weapons that have an everlasting affect on the body.
can it be considered off limits in war?
LOL. The US chemical weapons program comes from their absorption of the Japanese Unit 731 after WWII, just as their space program comes from their absorption of NSDAP rocket scientists. They used the same techniques (fleas and other insects infected with scarlet fever and other bloodborne diseases dropped across the countryside) to cover their retreat from the Korean war. To this day they insist that there aren't longterm health risks to depleted uranium munitions.
The only reason chemical weapons are so demonised is because they're much easier to manufacture and deploy (without the massive supply chains and enrichment plants) than nuclear weapons with potentially higher tactical efficacy. -
2022-02-16 at 1:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra The only reason chemical weapons are so demonised is because they're much easier to manufacture and deploy (without the massive supply chains and enrichment plants) than nuclear weapons with potentially higher tactical efficacy.
more like because they have a lower barrier for entry.
like budget airlines. -
2022-02-16 at 3:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny more like because they have a lower barrier for entry.
like budget airlines.
yeah, more or less what I was trying to get across. it is usually more effective (tactically) to wipe out everyone living in a district and leave the infrastructure intact than it is to obliterate the whole city though -
2022-02-16 at 3:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yeah, more or less what I was trying to get across. it is usually more effective (tactically) to wipe out everyone living in a district and leave the infrastructure intact than it is to obliterate the whole city though
whats more is that you can fund your enemy to do all the researches for you, get the samples and the results, release it back into their country and then blame them for accidental leaks.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2022-02-16 at 3:32 AM UTCis that how you spread the chinese virus to everyone vinny
