2022-03-06 at 7:12 PM UTC
The entire medical industry has lost any and all semblance of credibility. They sacrificed it all for their handlers' political whims, and money.
2022-04-11 at 11:38 AM UTC
Narc
Space Nigga
[connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
Originally posted by Obbe
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-60525591
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/28/ipcc-issues-bleakest-warning-yet-impacts-climate-breakdown
Interestingly, of report's key takeaways, close to half intersect with the other unmentioned planetary emergency: biodiversity and ecosystem loss. I guess IPCC doesn't want to share the spotlight with IPBES?
-Everywhere is affected, with no inhabited region escaping dire impacts from rising temperatures and increasingly extreme weather.
-About half the global population – between 3.3 billion and 3.6 billion people – live in areas “highly vulnerable” to climate change.
-Millions of people face food and water shortages owing to climate change, even at current levels of heating.
-Mass die-offs of species, from trees to corals, are already under way.
-1.5C above pre-industrial levels constitutes a “critical level” beyond which the impacts of the climate crisis accelerate strongly and some become irreversible.
-Coastal areas around the globe, and small, low-lying islands, face inundation at temperature rises of more than 1.5C.
-Key ecosystems are losing their ability to absorb carbon dioxide, turning them from carbon sinks to carbon sources.
-Some countries have agreed to conserve 30% of the Earth’s land, but conserving half may be necessary to restore the ability of natural ecosystems to cope with the damage wreaked on them
“The scientific evidence is unequivocal: climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and the health of the planet.”
“Any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future.”
About half the global population – between 3.3 billion and 3.6 billion
people – live in areas “highly vulnerable” to climate change.
It seems every time a new report is published, the situation have gotten even worse than what was predicted in the previous. And this time around the report says that: "The question at this point is not whether we can altogether avoid the crisis – it is whether we can avoid the worst consequences."
But don't focus too much on this, there is a war going on that you should focus on instead, and how nobody wants to work any more, and fight your neighbors over wearing a mask, and hold the line for the truckers! *honk honk*
You don't even need to be a scientist to see all the misinformation contained in there.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2022-04-11 at 11:39 AM UTC
Narc
Space Nigga
[connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
Conjecture, that was the word I was looking for.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2022-04-11 at 2:08 PM UTC
What argument? are you suggesting raven rock and other government underground complexes don't exist even though it's a matter of public record?
2022-04-11 at 3:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
Is that what you are suggesting I am suggesting?
No it was a question not a suggestion...hence the "?"
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
