User Controls

World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I guess your little study forgot to tell the Salmon to die off to fit the narrative.


    https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/fishing/PDFs/commercial/2010_norton_salmon_summary.pdf

    Bottom of page three LMAO



    You're such a complete idiot you mistakenly thought I was claiming the fish die off was due to climate change.
  2. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe You're such a complete idiot you mistakenly thought I was claiming the fish die off was due to climate change.

  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker

    re-read the thread carefully this time you no-nose know-nothing.
  4. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe re-read the thread carefully this time you no-nose know-nothing.

    Explain record catches of Salmon if the fish are dead and stop trying to backpedal out of the corner you walked into.
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    ^Thinks salmon are the only fish.

  6. Originally posted by Obbe What's stopping you?

    I don't see the point in running out to personally investigate topics which I see no hurry to investigate. For example, many people insist Santa Claus is real, but I don't see the sense in running out to personally investigate it. That would be like chasing clouds. A waste of energy, resources and focus.
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I don't see the point in running out to personally investigate topics which I see no hurry to investigate. For example, many people insist Santa Claus is real, but I don't see the sense in running out to personally investigate it. That would be like chasing clouds. A waste of energy, resources and focus.

    Circular logic - I won't verify it because I don't believe it, don't believe it because I won't verify it.

    The door is over there ---->
  8. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe ^Thinks salmon are the only fish.


    Thinks images on the internet are proof
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Thinks images on the internet are proof

    Literally says this after posting his own image from the internet.
  10. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    $1 in 1990 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $2.12 today. Fush priced at $1 in 1990 would cost you about $2.20 today. If half the supply was actually gone the price would not be in line qith the buying power of todays dollar as it relatws to the 1990 dollar.

    In other words think for yourself.
  11. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe Literally says this after posting his own image from the internet.

    I posted a screenshot shot of a locked PDF with the link to the source and the location of the shot in the document published by the Alaskan state Fish and Wildlife dept.


    You're not very good at thia huh?
  12. Donald Trump Black Hole
    Have either of you heard of fish farms?
  13. Originally posted by Obbe Circular logic - I won't verify it because I don't believe it, don't believe it because I won't verify it.

    The door is over there —->

    No, it just means my priorities are apparently not your priorities, that's all it means.
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I posted a screenshot shot of a locked PDF with the link to the source and the location of the shot in the document published by the Alaskan state Fish and Wildlife dept.


    You're not very good at thia huh?

    I posted a map and graphs showing relative changes in population biomass of analyzed populations over time expressed as a percentage of the average biomass including a source to the study published by researchers from the University of British Columbia, the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, and the University of Western Australia, showing these global long-term fishery biomass trends.

    You're trying to compare oranges to apples you no-nosed know-nothing.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No, it just means my priorities are apparently not your priorities, that's all it means.

    You claimed you couldn't verify it, now you've changed tunes and claiming it's just not a priority for you.

    That's fine SpectraL, the door is over there --->
  16. Originally posted by Obbe You claimed you couldn't verify it…

    Not true. Never said that. I said you haven't personally verified anything.
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Where is the logic in viewing information which can't be personally verified?

    I asked you what was stopping you, you now say it isn't a priority.
  18. Originally posted by Obbe I asked you what was stopping you, you now say it isn't a priority.

    You are assuming I would use fruit of the poisonous tree as my options for my sources available for me to peruse.
  19. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe I posted a map and graphs showing relative changes in population biomass of analyzed populations over time expressed as a percentage of the average biomass including a source to the study published by researchers from the University of British Columbia, the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, and the University of Western Australia, showing these global long-term fishery biomass trends.

    You're trying to compare oranges to apples you no-nosed know-nothing.

    An image wuth no source is just that.
  20. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by Obbe Denial occurs after we have taken in information and consciously reject it to avoid an uncomfortable truth. William Catton termed this behavior ‘ostrichism’ or the strategy of sticking your head in the figurative sand and expecting an issue to go away or persistent belief nothing will change and refusal to face facts.

    "It is a statement of fact, we cannot be any more certain; it is unequivocal and indisputable that humans are warming the planet."

    https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-58130705

    https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf

    https://us.cnn.com/2021/08/08/world/climate-warning-alok-sharma-cop26-ipcc-intl/index.html





    Of course it is, which is just another facet of collapse.

    Im still not convinced


    .
Jump to Top