User Controls

World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast

  1. Originally posted by Obbe The Alberta Sovereignty Act plays a dangerous game — for no rational reason

    All of a sudden these WEF creeps are concerned about Charter infringements. It's like magic. Nothing but real-life clowns.
  2. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson …or move to a place where food will also grow…you can aqueduct in all the water you want but the Sahara will still be a desert…and again, aqueducts cost money…walking doesn't.

    This whole line of talk reminds me of an old Sam Kinison bit.

  3. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson …or move to a place where food will also grow…you can aqueduct in all the water you want but the Sahara will still be a desert…and again, aqueducts cost money…walking doesn't.

    the mayans and asstecs must have had leaders like you.
  4. Forget the hoax distractions, here's the REAL problem, perpetuated by the very same cabal of thieves, criminals and traitors who pushes the hoaxes as a smoke screen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polychlorinated_biphenyl
  5. slide22 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson check out the ass on Grandma, who wants to get deep in those depends?

    i think her depends is leaking a bit
  6. Bradley Black Hole
    how massive do you think your carbon footprint is woznY?
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ All of a sudden these WEF creeps are concerned about Charter infringements. It's like magic. Nothing but real-life clowns.

    Nowhere does that article mention WEF.
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson …or move to a place where food will also grow…

    Climate migrants are a subset of environmental migrants who were forced to flee "due to sudden or gradual alterations in the natural environment related to at least one of three impacts of climate change: sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and drought and water scarcity."
  9. Bradley Black Hole
    obbe why don't you fucking TALK instead of just posting links

    Don't be the new STL1
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Bradley obbe why don't you fucking TALK instead of just posting links

    Don't be the new STL1

    I talk when I want to and post links when I want to.
  11. Bradley Black Hole
    ok mr sassy pants
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Increased drought forces California to deliver less water to cities | Only 5% of requested water supplies can be provided.

    California's ongoing drought and a poor forecast is forcing the state's water management agency to cut back on its fresh water supply to nearly 27 million residents.

    The state's Department of Water Resources announced Thursday an initial allocation of 5% of requested supplies for 2023 for 29 local water agencies across California.

    DWR Director Karla Nemeth said in a statement that the state is already preparing for a fourth dry year and more extreme drought conditions.
  14. Originally posted by Bradley obbe why don't you fucking TALK instead of just posting links

    Don't be the new STL1

    obbe doesnt have native thoughts.

    only migrant ideas.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny obbe doesnt have native thoughts.

    only migrant ideas.

    Originally posted by Obbe Nobody is authoring their own thoughts - nobody thinks about what they are going to think about before they think it. Our thoughts arise in our conscious mind out of subconscious processes which are influenced by our environment. It isn't really that different than vision. You aren't "inventing" the sights you see, your brain just processes the stimuli your eyes receive.
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Obbe Climate migrants are a subset of environmental migrants who were forced to flee "due to sudden or gradual alterations in the natural environment related to at least one of three impacts of climate change: sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and drought and water scarcity."

    $135 million to support managed retreat for tribes in the USA. This is only the beginning.

    the Briden administration is allocating $135 million through the Bureau of Indian Affairs to support managed retreat. Three communities will get $25 million each, and eight will get $5 million each for planning.

    Managed retreat will be the wave of the future. This is a mere drop in the bucket compared to what is coming, but is notable as the biggest bet to date by the US government on explicitly climate change related relocation.
  17. Originally posted by Obbe $135 million to support managed retreat for tribes in the USA. This is only the beginning.

    Just goes to show you can make up any imaginary scenario and start flogging it.
  18. Originally posted by Obbe



    doesnt understand the definition of thoughts.

  19. Everything you need to know about the lies...

  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Bill McKibben weighs in on dimming the sun to avoid climate catastrophe: The scientists who study solar geoengineering don’t want anyone to try it. But climate inaction is making it more likely.

    If we decide to “solar geoengineer” the Earth—to spray highly reflective particles of a material, such as sulfur, into the stratosphere in order to deflect sunlight and so cool the planet—it will be the second most expansive project that humans have ever undertaken. (The first, obviously, is the ongoing emission of carbon and other heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere.) The idea behind solar geoengineering is essentially to mimic what happens when volcanoes push particles into the atmosphere; a large eruption, such as that of Mt. Pinatubo, in the Philippines, in 1992, can measurably cool the world for a year or two. This scheme, not surprisingly, has few public advocates, and even among those who want to see it studied the inference has been that it would not actually be implemented for decades. “I’m not saying they’ll do it tomorrow,” Dan Schrag, the director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment, who serves on the advisory board of a geoengineering-research project based at the university, told my colleague Elizabeth Kolbert for “Under a White Sky,” her excellent book on technical efforts to repair environmental damage, published last year. “I feel like we might have thirty years,” he said. It’s a number he repeated to me when we met in Cambridge this summer.

    Others, around the world, however, are working to speed up that timeline. There are at least three initiatives under way that are studying the potential implementation of solar-radiation management, or S.R.M., as it is sometimes called: a commission under the auspices of the Paris Peace Forum, composed of fifteen current and former global leaders and some environmental and governance experts, that is exploring “policy options” to combat climate change and how these policies might be monitored; a Carnegie Council initiative of how the United Nations might govern geoengineering; and Degrees Initiative, an academic effort based in the United Kingdom and funded by a collection of foundations, that in turn funds research on the effects of such a scheme across the developing world. The result of these initiatives, if not the goal, may be to normalize the idea of geoengineering. It is being taken seriously because of something else that’s speeding up: the horrors that come with an overheating world and now regularly threaten its most densely populated places.
Jump to Top