User Controls
They act like Biden had much of a choice?
-
2020-08-14 at 5:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 I didn't think you were actually this slow.
Biden is a private individual and is therefore not under any legal constrictions. He can do whatever he pleases…at this time. Hell, he's not even the official Democratic nominee as of yet.
Was that simple enough for you to understand, Jiggy?
Right it's no problem right now as he is unlikely to win...
but IF he becomes president then it does become a problem. He is no longer a private individual and the position of V.P. is a public position...and that candidate was selected using sexual discrimination.
Doesn't matter when that happened, it's reality when the position is actually filled.
ETA: Even setting aside the legality of it, the moral factor of discrimination from the "anti discrimination" party is laughable and quite typical of the hypocrisy driven dems. -
2020-08-14 at 5:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 I didn't think you were actually this slow.
Biden is a private individual and is therefore not under any legal constrictions. He can do whatever he pleases…at this time. Hell, he's not even the official Democratic nominee as of yet.
Was that simple enough for you to understand, Jiggy?
Hey look skool, maybe you don't get it but don't you think that you're being a little bit reckless with the bull shit your pushing? Who knows maybe not because anyone thats not a nit wit knows joe biden is full of shit. I don't like Trump but lets just be real Joe Biden is a huge asshole and a plant.
You're part of the lemon party.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-14 at 5:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Um I already addressed this…."Washington post" Lol…must be true and factual, right?
How about reports from Fox News? Do you believe them?
Here is an article about Fox calling Trump out about his Kamala Harris "birther" crap...just like he tried doing to Obama.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-slammed-for-not-rejecting-conspiracy-theory-kamala-harris-is-ineligible-for-vice-presidency -
2020-08-14 at 5:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson
Right it's no problem right now as he is unlikely to win…
but IF he becomes president then it does become a problem. He is no longer a private individual and the position of V.P. is a public position…and that candidate was selected using sexual discrimination.
Doesn't matter when that happened, it's reality when the position is actually filled.
ETA: Even setting aside the legality of it, the moral factor of discrimination from the "anti discrimination" party is laughable and quite typical of the hypocrisy driven dems.
Do you actually believe the crap you spew?
Jesus. -
2020-08-14 at 5:33 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 5:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 Do you actually believe the crap you spew?
Jesus.
Which part of it do you feel is inaccurate? are you suggesting the VP isn't a public position/job??? or that Biden Didn't upfront state and then follow through on selecting a woman? (thereby discriminating against male candidates)?
Idiot be thy name.
As you note it's not important if he loses...but if he wins it is...and the selection for VP would have been on based on sexual discrimination.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-14 at 5:35 PM UTCThey big mad they gettin a Kamala after 8 years of a Barack.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-14 at 5:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 I didn't think you were actually this slow.
Biden is a private individual and is therefore not under any legal constrictions. He can do whatever he pleases…at this time. Hell, he's not even the official Democratic nominee as of yet.
Was that simple enough for you to understand, Jiggy?
Originally posted by stl1 Do you actually believe the crap you spew?
Jesus.
You addressed the legality, now address the morality. -
2020-08-14 at 5:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Which part of it do you feel is inaccurate? are you suggesting the VP isn't a public position/job??? or that Biden Didn't upfront state and then follow through on selecting a woman? (thereby discriminating against male candidates)?
Idiot be thy name.
Inanity not worth debating.
How did you like The Fix Is In News article? -
2020-08-14 at 5:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting You addressed the legality, now address the morality.
He didn't really address the legality...IF she becomes VP then the sexual discrimination stands at that point...the selection doesn't matter at this present time he's right about that...but it will when and if it is played out and she becomes V.P. based on a sexually discriminatory selection process. -
2020-08-14 at 5:41 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 5:44 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 5:46 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 5:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 First, discuss the morality of not having a female vice president or president for almost 2 1/2 centuries when they are half of the population.
So your logic here is "it's ok to be discriminatory because everyone else so far has been".
lolol, fucking gold.
The difference is the claim of being progressive...but then not being.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-14 at 5:54 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 5:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson So your logic here is "it's ok to be discriminatory because everyone else so far has been".
lolol, fucking gold.
The difference is the claim of being progressive…but then not being.
That arguement worked for the Supreme Court and college admissions now, didn't it? -
2020-08-14 at 6 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 6:46 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 7:17 PM UTC
-
2020-08-14 at 7:18 PM UTC
