User Controls
Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'
-
2020-08-29 at 7:41 PM UTC
-
2020-08-29 at 7:58 PM UTC
-
2020-08-29 at 8:01 PM UTC
-
2020-08-29 at 11:45 PM UTC
-
2020-08-30 at 12:31 AM UTCIt's not going to fall. The social dynamics are in favor of most people, and especially women.
-
2020-08-30 at 8:25 AM UTC
-
2020-08-30 at 8:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Hurricanes, fires, floods and locusts: Science says climate change is here but the RNC refuses to believe:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/28/weather/rapid-fire-disasters-in-coronavirus-pandemic-weir-wxc/index.html
In 2020, we have giant swarms of locusts from East Africa to India, 500-year floods in Europe, fears of a dam collapse in China and Typhoon Bavi hitting the Korean Peninsula. In the US alone there is the record-smashing hurricane in the South, a million-acre "gigafire" in the West and over 40% of Iowa corn and soybeans flattened by 140 mph winds.
Complicating the mounting task of saving lives and livelihoods in this ongoing climate crisis: a new disease, released from a natural world out of balance.
fiery but peacefull forest fires. -
2020-08-30 at 8:28 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-30 at 11:13 AM UTC
-
2020-08-30 at 11:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev What?
Opinion backed up with no facts or data. "Many studies" without citing them.
Opinion.
Fact.
so this is the best you got?
Then what is it?
"No it isnt" does not refute the long term record, you have not provided any data to the contrary.
Literally refused to look at their cited data and claims nothing was cited lol. -
2020-08-30 at 3:26 PM UTCPhoenix hits 50th day of 110 degrees; previous record 'obliterated'
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix-weather/2020/08/28/phoenix-hits-50th-day-110-degrees-2020/5662386002/?fbclid=IwAR1_In1w6dQ7jp2mO1EieT_XktR4TH29_ABHaP1AmG1n9Qew6_XjZ1HKQFk -
2020-08-31 at 5:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Literally refused to look at their cited data and claims nothing was cited lol.
Then cite the data right now since i apparently missed it. Dont give me someones opinion and do an appeal to authority argument because someone with credentials offered such an opinion. stop the "just because the past was warmer doesnt mean we shouldnt be scared" bullshit.
be scared in your own room. if you want to change my opinion, i need facts, not lunatic freakouts. -
2020-08-31 at 5:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny we're entering an era of scientific inquisition.
https://www.libertynation.com/a-climate-alarmist-sued-a-skeptic-for-defamation-and-lost/
"The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball's libel lawyers. Not only did the court grant Ball's application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist [Ball] is expected in due course. This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are "unprecedented." ... Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the 'working out') behind the world-famous 'hockey stick' graph."
Despite this, he is still a favorite of the IPCC and he keeps his post as one of the leading climate alarmists. inquisition indeed.
propaganda trumps truth, you know how the story goes. -
2020-08-31 at 6:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Then cite the data right now since i apparently missed it. Dont give me someones opinion and do an appeal to authority argument because someone with credentials offered such an opinion. stop the "just because the past was warmer doesnt mean we shouldnt be scared" bullshit.
be scared in your own room. if you want to change my opinion, i need facts, not lunatic freakouts.
Click the links in the article and tell me SPECIFICALLY what you find WRONG. -
2020-08-31 at 7:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev https://www.libertynation.com/a-climate-alarmist-sued-a-skeptic-for-defamation-and-lost/
"The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball's libel lawyers. Not only did the court grant Ball's application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist [Ball] is expected in due course. This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are "unprecedented." … Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the 'working out') behind the world-famous 'hockey stick' graph."
Despite this, he is still a favorite of the IPCC and he keeps his post as one of the leading climate alarmists. inquisition indeed.
propaganda trumps truth, you know how the story goes.
if you think this is the end you will be sore and mistaken.
far from it, this is only the begining of the tip of a long and gargantuan chode of scientifique inquisition.
no, dont brace yourselves, because it will brace you. all of you. -
2020-08-31 at 7:53 AM UTC
-
2020-08-31 at 7:56 AM UTC
-
2020-08-31 at 9:05 AM UTC
-
2020-08-31 at 9:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Click the links in the article and tell me SPECIFICALLY what you find WRONG.
Which link? keep in mind that you have ignored the sources as well as the data i provided numerous times so your credibility wears thin as is my patience to debunk every single falsehood you harp on.
let us stay on track, i dont care to derail into a hundred other subtopics.
You claim human activity is warming the planet, this is called AGW theory.
I counter that the long term record refutes the AGW theory, one only needs to look at it for a millisecond to notice the COOLING trend.
you complained that the data derived from isotopes from greenland and vostoks ice cores are inacurrate because the points are 20-year averages. i tried to get you to clarify but you then claimed they arent even 20-year averages so i dont get what youre disputing.
For the record, here is the data.
https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/gisp2/isotopes/gisp2_temp_accum_alley2000.txt
The points are actually 8-year averages at the most recent and they get bigger further back into the record, reaching 80 years at 50000 BCE.
so does this clear shit up on whatever you were confused about? of all things, you complain about the resolution so i am completely lost what youre stuck on. -
2020-08-31 at 9:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny if you think this is the end you will be sore and mistaken.
far from it, this is only the begining of the tip of a long and gargantuan chode of scientifique inquisition.
no, dont brace yourselves, because it will brace you. all of you.
Im aware of that, unfortunately. The warming hoaxers right now control the propaganda machine which will always convince more minds than actual science and they fight dirty, such as using a mentally ill child (greta thunberg) to parrot their lies. now if you dare speak up, you hate children!
just look at how they convinced everyone that a seasonal flu with a 0.1% death rate will cause an apocalypse.
fucking sickening.
