User Controls

Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Please, ramble on more about people and their credibility.

    That didn't scare me.
  2. larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL That didn't scare me.

    ^Grown man thinking not being scared is something to brag about
  3. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Please, ramble on more about people and their credibility.

    ^needs updated firmware for his sarcasm hardware
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 ^Grown man thinking not being scared is something to brag about

    That didn't frighten me either.
  5. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    It's not going to fall. The social dynamics are in favor of most people, and especially women.
  6. Originally posted by ORACLE Fortunately Earth is not Jupiter and has a thin homogenous atmosphere over its rocky surface.

    the only thing homo about it is you.

    and your boy loving ilk.
  7. Originally posted by Obbe Hurricanes, fires, floods and locusts: Science says climate change is here but the RNC refuses to believe:

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/28/weather/rapid-fire-disasters-in-coronavirus-pandemic-weir-wxc/index.html

    In 2020, we have giant swarms of locusts from East Africa to India, 500-year floods in Europe, fears of a dam collapse in China and Typhoon Bavi hitting the Korean Peninsula. In the US alone there is the record-smashing hurricane in the South, a million-acre "gigafire" in the West and over 40% of Iowa corn and soybeans flattened by 140 mph winds.

    Complicating the mounting task of saving lives and livelihoods in this ongoing climate crisis: a new disease, released from a natural world out of balance.

    fiery but peacefull forest fires.
  8. Originally posted by -SpectraL "Science says". "Science" has to be one of the worst judges of truth on the planet.

    we're entering an era of scientific inquisition.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the only thing homo about it is you.

    and your boy loving ilk.

    Actually it has a moon named after you, called Homos
  10. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev What?



    Opinion backed up with no facts or data. "Many studies" without citing them.



    Opinion.



    Fact.

    so this is the best you got?



    Then what is it?



    "No it isnt" does not refute the long term record, you have not provided any data to the contrary.

    Literally refused to look at their cited data and claims nothing was cited lol.
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Phoenix hits 50th day of 110 degrees; previous record 'obliterated'

    https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix-weather/2020/08/28/phoenix-hits-50th-day-110-degrees-2020/5662386002/?fbclid=IwAR1_In1w6dQ7jp2mO1EieT_XktR4TH29_ABHaP1AmG1n9Qew6_XjZ1HKQFk
  12. Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by ORACLE Literally refused to look at their cited data and claims nothing was cited lol.

    Then cite the data right now since i apparently missed it. Dont give me someones opinion and do an appeal to authority argument because someone with credentials offered such an opinion. stop the "just because the past was warmer doesnt mean we shouldnt be scared" bullshit.

    be scared in your own room. if you want to change my opinion, i need facts, not lunatic freakouts.
  13. Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny we're entering an era of scientific inquisition.

    https://www.libertynation.com/a-climate-alarmist-sued-a-skeptic-for-defamation-and-lost/

    "The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball's libel lawyers. Not only did the court grant Ball's application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist [Ball] is expected in due course. This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are "unprecedented." ... Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the 'working out') behind the world-famous 'hockey stick' graph."

    Despite this, he is still a favorite of the IPCC and he keeps his post as one of the leading climate alarmists. inquisition indeed.

    propaganda trumps truth, you know how the story goes.
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev Then cite the data right now since i apparently missed it. Dont give me someones opinion and do an appeal to authority argument because someone with credentials offered such an opinion. stop the "just because the past was warmer doesnt mean we shouldnt be scared" bullshit.

    be scared in your own room. if you want to change my opinion, i need facts, not lunatic freakouts.

    Click the links in the article and tell me SPECIFICALLY what you find WRONG.
  15. Originally posted by Kev https://www.libertynation.com/a-climate-alarmist-sued-a-skeptic-for-defamation-and-lost/

    "The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball's libel lawyers. Not only did the court grant Ball's application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist [Ball] is expected in due course. This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are "unprecedented." … Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the 'working out') behind the world-famous 'hockey stick' graph."

    Despite this, he is still a favorite of the IPCC and he keeps his post as one of the leading climate alarmists. inquisition indeed.

    propaganda trumps truth, you know how the story goes.

    if you think this is the end you will be sore and mistaken.

    far from it, this is only the begining of the tip of a long and gargantuan chode of scientifique inquisition.

    no, dont brace yourselves, because it will brace you. all of you.
  16. Originally posted by ORACLE Click the links in the article and tell me SPECIFICALLY what you find WRONG.

    dont bother. captain bangla will just slither away quitely once hes proven to be wrong.
  17. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny dont bother. captain bangla will just slither away quitely once hes proven to be wrong.

    Man you are pretty upset.
  18. Soyboy 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting African Astronaut [scrub the quick-drying deinonychus]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny dont bother. captain bangla will just slither away quitely once hes proven to be wrong.

    Like with that mask thread
  19. Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by ORACLE Click the links in the article and tell me SPECIFICALLY what you find WRONG.

    Which link? keep in mind that you have ignored the sources as well as the data i provided numerous times so your credibility wears thin as is my patience to debunk every single falsehood you harp on.

    let us stay on track, i dont care to derail into a hundred other subtopics.

    You claim human activity is warming the planet, this is called AGW theory.

    I counter that the long term record refutes the AGW theory, one only needs to look at it for a millisecond to notice the COOLING trend.


    you complained that the data derived from isotopes from greenland and vostoks ice cores are inacurrate because the points are 20-year averages. i tried to get you to clarify but you then claimed they arent even 20-year averages so i dont get what youre disputing.

    For the record, here is the data.
    https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/gisp2/isotopes/gisp2_temp_accum_alley2000.txt

    The points are actually 8-year averages at the most recent and they get bigger further back into the record, reaching 80 years at 50000 BCE.

    so does this clear shit up on whatever you were confused about? of all things, you complain about the resolution so i am completely lost what youre stuck on.
  20. Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny if you think this is the end you will be sore and mistaken.

    far from it, this is only the begining of the tip of a long and gargantuan chode of scientifique inquisition.

    no, dont brace yourselves, because it will brace you. all of you.

    Im aware of that, unfortunately. The warming hoaxers right now control the propaganda machine which will always convince more minds than actual science and they fight dirty, such as using a mentally ill child (greta thunberg) to parrot their lies. now if you dare speak up, you hate children!

    just look at how they convinced everyone that a seasonal flu with a 0.1% death rate will cause an apocalypse.

    fucking sickening.
Jump to Top