User Controls

Why do you, or don’t you wear a mask?

  1. the particles can float here is a close up electron microscopic image of one

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by street_carp Who are you talking to? Nobody here is saying the things you're arguing against.

    Face masks are part of a protocol for risk mitigation, not a preventive measure. Silly goose.

    They don't mitigate risks whatsoever. In fact, a double blind study came out which shows wearing a mask increases your likelihood of getting the virus, because they provide a false sense of security. Only the uneducated idiots who never did the actual research don't know a mask is entirely useless against this virus. The virus particles are 0.004 microns, and even the N95 can only filter down to 0.30 microns. The virus is so small it suspends itself in your breath. A mask isn't going to stop you from breathing, and only a retard thinks you won't get the virus by breathing in an infected person's breath.
  3. Originally posted by -SpectraL They don't mitigate risks whatsoever. In fact, a double blind study came out which shows wearing a mask increases your likelihood of getting the virus, because they provide a false sense of security. Only the uneducated idiots who never did the actual research don't know a mask is entirely useless against this virus. The virus particles are 0.004 microns, and even the N95 can only filter down to 0.30 microns. The virus is so small it suspends itself in your breath. A mask isn't going to stop you from breathing, and only a retard thinks you won't get the virus by breathing in an infected person's breath.

    sos ?
  4. Originally posted by -SpectraL They don't mitigate risks whatsoever. In fact, a double blind study came out which shows wearing a mask increases your likelihood of getting the virus, because they provide a false sense of security. Only the uneducated idiots who never did the actual research don't know a mask is entirely useless against this virus. The virus particles are 0.004 microns, and even the N95 can only filter down to 0.30 microns. The virus is so small it suspends itself in your breath. A mask isn't going to stop you from breathing, and only a retard thinks you won't get the virus by breathing in an infected person's breath.

    SpectraL says shit like this then brings up how the WHO lied about masks helping
  5. Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    Apparently spectral is the WHO
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny sos ?

    https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0015044
  7. Originally posted by -SpectraL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0015044

    "Wearing a mask close enough to the face significantly reduces the droplet cloud."

    "the nominal efficiency of the present mask is ∼91%."

    "For a mask enhancement with an initial efficiency of ∼91% and environmental conditions of zero wind speed, subjects wearing a mask will not only reduce the respiratory droplet transmission but also (partially) shield themselves from the droplet jet expelled from other subjects in their proximity."

    "D32 is a representative measure of droplet evolution because at each time instant, it is applied to all the droplets that are inside the domain. D32 is higher for the case without a mask compared to the scenario with"

    "The Liquid Penetration Distance (LPD) is an important parameter that describes the maximum distance traveled by a saliva liquid droplet made of 95% of its initial mass. Figure 18 shows that LPD reduces from about 42 cm to 22.38 cm after the tenth cycle when wearing a face mask."

    I could go on but this study says literally the exact opposite of what you said.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. street_carp African Astronaut


    Say it again for the people in the back.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Does anyone know how to install a HEPA vacuum cleaner enhancement onto a facemask?
  10. I use K&N enhancements on my gas mask it gives me 11 extra horrace power
  11. Originally posted by street_carp

    Say it again for the people in the back.

    I am definitely saving this to spam SpectraL later
  12. 🅱️anny doesn't take kindly to s🅱️amming, son
  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace "Wearing a mask close enough to the face significantly reduces the droplet cloud."

    "the nominal efficiency of the present mask is ∼91%."

    "For a mask enhancement with an initial efficiency of ∼91% and environmental conditions of zero wind speed, subjects wearing a mask will not only reduce the respiratory droplet transmission but also (partially) shield themselves from the droplet jet expelled from other subjects in their proximity."

    "D32 is a representative measure of droplet evolution because at each time instant, it is applied to all the droplets that are inside the domain. D32 is higher for the case without a mask compared to the scenario with"

    "The Liquid Penetration Distance (LPD) is an important parameter that describes the maximum distance traveled by a saliva liquid droplet made of 95% of its initial mass. Figure 18 shows that LPD reduces from about 42 cm to 22.38 cm after the tenth cycle when wearing a face mask."

    I could go on but this study says literally the exact opposite of what you said.

    Problem with that is, "significantly reduced" doesn't mean shit. All it takes is a single particle, and there are millions of them suspended in a person's escaped breath, so it doesn't matter that you stopped some of them. You just didn't interpret the study correctly.
  14. 91%
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace 91%

    It only takes 0.000000000000000000000000000000001% to get infected.
  16. Originally posted by -SpectraL It only takes 0.000000000000000000000000000000001% to get infected.

    So what it decreases viral load and significantly reduces your chance of getting infected. I'd rather have 91% of the virus stopped than 0% of it stopped. It has been proven to work
  17. Besides the fact if you get the infection you will obviously be Leaking plenty enough through that chain link of a femce to infect everyone elae anyway.

    But then enough particles will stick to it for you go reinhale and make sure you get a triple dose for a strong strong infection. Much more likely to die if you do get it, from wearing a disease rag all the time
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace So what it decreases viral load and significantly reduces your chance of getting infected. I'd rather have 91% of the virus stopped than 0% of it stopped. It has been proven to work

    Let's say you have 100 nuclear missiles, and each missile has enough payload to destroy the entire country. If you stop 99 of the missiles and one gets through, guess what? It didn't matter that you stopped the 99. Same thing with this virus. Don't let the retards fool you. If you have a mask on and a person with COVID-19 breathes anywhere in your vanity, and you breathe in a single particle, you'll be infected. And this virus is especially virulent. Stopping 90% of the particles isn't going to do shit.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Originally posted by -SpectraL Let's say you have 100 nuclear missiles, and each missile has enough payload to destroy the entire country. If you stop 99 of the missiles and one gets through, guess what? It didn't matter that you stopped the 99. Same thing with this virus. Don't let the retards fool you. If you have a mask on and a person with COVID-19 breathes anywhere in your vanity, and you breathe in a single particle, you'll be infected. And this virus is especially virulent. Stopping 90% of the particles isn't going to do shit.

    If you aren't a dedicated troll you are severely brain damaged.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. Originally posted by I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4 🅱️anny doesn't take kindly to s🅱️amming, son

    Did he inbox you as well? I just got a message from winter mute crying about calling grills and Octavian annoying shit posters even though they spam every thread with COCK NOSE I FUKD UR GRANDAD
Jump to Top