User Controls

What happened to hydroxychloriquine?

  1. Originally posted by Technologist Every drug has that 0.00007% chance of causing harm.

    willfully killing 7 to save a million is an acceptable price to pay ?

    i bet ancient mayans sacrificed less humans per million than that to please theor sun god.
  2. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by CASPER syringe gun from TF2 loaded with drugs

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Technologist victim of incest
    I can see no one is getting my point. Maybe I’m high😁

    My point is that when trials are done on humans, if 1 person in 500,000 people gets diarrhea, then they have to include that as a side affect. Everyone’s chemistry is not the same, there will always be “freak” side affects.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by aldra where

    "Of the remaining 32 cases, the vaccination history was available. Of these, 7 infants (21.9%) received immunization within 7 days of death, and 8 (25.0%) received immunization from 8 to 28 days before death (Table 1). Of 11 infants younger than 6 months who received vaccination, 4 (36.4%) had received some vaccinations within 7 days."


    ORIGINAL ARTICLES
    Sudden Infant Death After Vaccination
    Survey of Forensic Autopsy Files

    Osawa, Motoki MD, PhD; Nagao, Ryoko MD, PhD; Kakimoto, Yu MD, PhD; Kakiuchi, Yasuhiro MD, PhD; Satoh, Fumiko MD, PhDAuthor Information
    The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology: September 2019 - Volume 40 - Issue 3 - p 232-237
    doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000494
    OPEN
    Metrics
    Abstract

    Sudden infant deaths might be attributable to adverse reaction to vaccination, but separating them from coincidental occurrences is difficult. This study retrospectively investigated vaccination-related details and postmortem findings for 57 cases of sudden death in children 2 years or younger. Data were extracted from autopsy files at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine. Vaccination histories were available in 50 cases based on the maternity passbook. Of the 32 cases in which any vaccines were administered, 7 infants (21.9%) had received immunization within 7 days of death. The most frequent vaccine cited as the last immunization before death was Haemophilus influenzae B. Although a temporal association of vaccines with sudden death was present for two 3-month-old and one 14-month-old infants in whom death occurred within 3 days of receiving the H. influenzae type b and other vaccinations, a definitive relationship between the vaccine and death could not be identified. Histopathological examinations revealed pneumonia and upper respiratory infection as contributing to death in their cases. Moreover, all 3 cases showed hemophagocytosis in the spleen and lymph nodes, which are similar features to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Judgment of the disorders as truly related to vaccination is difficult, but suspicious cases do exist. Forensic pathologists must devote more attention to vaccination in sudden infant death cases.

    Sudden infant death (SID) usually occurs during the course of normal development and before revealing clinical symptoms, unlike cases in adults where the cause of death often can be inferred based on the clinical data and history.1 Therefore, various disorders from abuse to congenital disease must be differentiated in SID cases.2 To elucidate the etiological background, a sheet of more than 30 check points of settings has been used in Japan.3 Vaccination history is included among the major points.

    For unknown causes of SID, attributable factors have been sought from various approaches. For instance, forensic autopsy cases of unexpected simultaneous twin deaths have been investigated extensively.4,5 Roberts6 demonstrated such a twin death, which occurred a couple of hours after diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccination, speculating that the immunization potentially gives a clue for the attributable factors. Another case report described twins found dead simultaneously after combined vaccine including DTP.7 Forensic autopsy has also revealed sudden death after DTP with mast cell increase as a relation to vaccination.8 By contrast, several large-scale studies have revealed that increased DTP immunization coverage is associated with decreased sudden infant mortality.9–14 Therefore, most SID syndrome (SIDS) cases are regarded as merely coincident, with no particular relation to DTP vaccination.15

    Nevertheless, in 2011, 7 fatal incidents occurred in short order after combined immunization with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccines in Japan.16 Because some relation was suspected, vaccination was discontinued temporarily. Based on the Preventive Vaccination Act, Japan has a system to notify the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency when a critical side effect is suspected. Forensic pathologists receive detailed knowledge about the circumstances preceding death from police officers, but they usually do not devote much attention to the vaccination history unless parents claim adverse effects of vaccination. The number of licensed vaccines has increased to the present day, and they are administrated simultaneously.17,18 It might be difficult to show evidence of adverse effect despite their potential incidence.19 Presumably, most SIDS subjects younger than 6 months should inevitably receive vaccination. However, few data have been forthcoming related to how close to the time of death they were vaccinated and which kinds of vaccines were used.

    We retrospectively extracted cases of medicolegal autopsy of death after vaccination from infant autopsy reports of the last 5 years. We first present the rate of death within 28 days after vaccination among SID cases, which include subjects younger than 2 years in the present study. In addition, 3 cases in which infants died within 3 days are described. Suspected adverse reactions are highlighted and explored.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    From autopsy cases conducted at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, in 5 years (2013–2017), 57 cases of sudden death in infants younger than 2 years were reviewed, excluding deaths that were reasonably attributable to external causes such as abuse or burns. Data from clinical and laboratory examinations done in the emergency department, investigations conducted by police, the maternity record book, and other materials were used. In Japan, a record of received vaccines is noted in a maternity passbook kept by the mother, which includes all medical and welfare records of the mother and her baby. For this study, we obtained vaccination course information from these passbooks, which were available for all but 7 infants. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokai University School of Medicine as a retrospective clinical study (no. 16-281).

    The series of autopsy was performed as reported previously.20,21 Briefly, tissue examination was performed for formalin-fixed organs using hematoxylin and eosin staining and microscopy, with special staining, such as Gram staining, as appropriate. Biochemical laboratory tests were applied for markers that are stable after death. However, only a few test items could be tested because of the limited amount of samples obtained from autopsy. Viral antibody titer was measured in the serum for adenovirus, influenza A and B viruses, coxsackievirus B, and cytomegalovirus. Bacterial culture was performed using laryngeal swabs, blood in the heart, or a lung section.

    RESULTS

    Survey of SID Cases in Forensic Autopsy

    Fifty-seven cases (33 male, 24 female) of SID, which were subjected to medicolegal autopsy, were extracted, excluding those from extrinsic causes such as abuse. The age distribution is presented in Figure 1. The cause of death, as diagnosed separately by 4 forensic pathologists, was regarded as SIDS suspected in 20 cases, infectious pulmonary disorders including pneumonia in 10 cases, viral encephalopathy in 3 cases, enteritis and ileus in 3 cases, congenital heart anomaly in 2 cases, potential asphyxia in 2 cases, and unknown cause in 17 cases.

    FIGURE 1
    FIGURE 1: Age distribution and days after their last vaccine of 57 SID cases of autopsy for 5 years.
    Their vaccination history was confirmed in 50 cases based on passbook records, but such data were not available for 7. Eighteen infants younger than 2 months received no immunization. For the remaining 32 cases, the vaccination history was available. Of these, 7 infants (21.9%) received immunization within 7 days of death, and 8 (25.0%) received immunization from 8 to 28 days before death (Table 1). Of 11 infants younger than 6 months who received vaccination, 4 (36.4%) had received some vaccinations within 7 days.

    Table 2 summarizes vaccines that infants were administered within the last 7 days and last 28 days before death. It was characterized that the most frequently administered vaccine in single or combined immunizations was Hib, occurring in 5 (71%) of the 7 infants who received vaccines within 3 days of death and 12 (80%) of 15 infants who received vaccines within 28 days of death. Among these cases, a temporal relationship to vaccination was considered at the time of autopsy for 3 infants (cases 1–3) because their death occurred within 3 days after vaccination. Moreover, they all had received Hib as the last vaccination. All exhibited similar courses as described hereinafter."

    https://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/Fulltext/2019/09000/Sudden_Infant_Death_After_Vaccination__Survey_of.5.aspx
  5. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    I'm going to go ahead and assume you didn't read that study at all, because all it is is a statistical check to see how many children from a group had recently been vaccinated prior to dying of SIDS.

    It makes no claims as to causation whatsoever.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by aldra I'm going to go ahead and assume you didn't read that study at all, because all it is is a statistical check to see how many children from a group had recently been vaccinated prior to dying of SIDS.

    It makes no claims as to causation whatsoever.

    It's you who didn't read the study or look at the associations it produced. You went into it with a closed mind right from the get-go.
  7. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    That's exactly what I said.

    Associations or correlation, not causation.
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by aldra That's exactly what I said.

    Associations or correlation, not causation.

    Yeah, they all died within days of getting a vaccine, but there's no causation.
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Here we debunk the lies about the success of hydrocloroquine.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RexUjedimzSE
  10. Technologist victim of incest
    You ain’t debunking shit. It took me to YouTube then said the video wasn’t available. Care to try again?
  11. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, they all died within days of getting a vaccine, but there's no causation.


    what's even more amusing is that they bothered to do a study at all - anyone with a room-temperature IQ can work out that, yes, of course there's going to be a significant number of infants who die of SIDS soon after receiving a vaccine because...

    The majority of vaccines are administered between 0-1 year old, and
    SIDS is the sudden death of a child under 1 year old.
  12. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Technologist You ain’t debunking shit. It took me to YouTube then said the video wasn’t available. Care to try again?

    Yeah, the leftist tits at YouTube are playing games. You'll have to cut and paste the link into your browser.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RexUjedimzSE
  13. Technologist victim of incest
    Yup. My nephew had SIDS. He survived it with a cardiac monitor on at night or when napping.
  14. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, the leftist tits at YouTube are playing games. You'll have to cut and paste the link into your browser.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RexUjedimzSE

    if you need a youtube video to support your argument, it's not a very good argument.

    also, I get the same, video unavailable
  15. Technologist victim of incest
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, the leftist tits at YouTube are playing games. You'll have to cut and paste the link into your browser.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RexUjedimzSE




    Oh I’m not bothering with it now. I was only looking to see what tinfoil hat you found on YouTube.
  16. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Technologist Yup. My nephew had SIDS. He survived it with a cardiac monitor on at night or when napping.

    probably inaccurate to call it SIDS then I guess. SISS?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Technologist victim of incest
    Originally posted by aldra probably inaccurate to call it SIDS then I guess. SISS?

    It had been awhile after SIDS was “discovered”, so they had a lot of breakthroughs. That’s why you don’t hear much about it now.
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, the leftist tits at YouTube are playing games. You'll have to cut and paste the link into your browser.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RexUjedimzSE

    Notice how they change the DNS pointer from RexUjedimzSE to RexUjedimzQ invisibly. Very clever little fuckwits.


    https://video.foxnews.com/v/6151474053001
  19. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    that's not DNS, that's a php get parameter
  20. CASPER Soldier of Fourchin
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Singling them out for what? We can't even accurately test for mental illness. There are some markers but none are definitive. That's why they're called mental disorders and not mental diseases.

    If you're worried about a DNA database giving you away, get rid of the phone in your pocket. Its way more revealing than your DNA.

    And tracking?? Lol how are they gonna track you with DNA? Go around swabbing what you might have touched? GPS works just fine for tracking.

    We can already engineer diseases for certain populations. We do it with drugs. Check Bidil. Its FDA approved for black people only.

    DNA is pretty useless unless you've committed a crime. And even then they rarely do DNA testing.

    They caught The Grim Sleeper here in LA after like 30 years bc the guys son was convicted of a felony and had to give a swab. Then then matched it to the grim sleeper dna thatd been unmatched to that point. Followed the family members and an FBI agent dressed like a busboy, grabbed the fathers uneaten pizza crust and arrested him a couple weeks later.


    E: I KNEW IT FUCK U HUSSEIN OBAMA

    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/we-will-find-you-dna-search-used-nab-golden-state-killer-can-home-about-60-white
Jump to Top