User Controls
What happened to hydroxychloriquine?
-
2020-04-24 at 4:08 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:12 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:16 AM UTCTuna also has mercury. Ban tunamelts.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-24 at 4:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER singling out people with predispositions for mental illness, etc. Tying you to crimes or activist actions. Tracking family members. Engineering diseases to target certain populations.
I can think of a handful of things thatd be pretty not-great.
Singling them out for what? We can't even accurately test for mental illness. There are some markers but none are definitive. That's why they're called mental disorders and not mental diseases.
If you're worried about a DNA database giving you away, get rid of the phone in your pocket. Its way more revealing than your DNA.
And tracking?? Lol how are they gonna track you with DNA? Go around swabbing what you might have touched? GPS works just fine for tracking.
We can already engineer diseases for certain populations. We do it with drugs. Check Bidil. Its FDA approved for black people only.
DNA is pretty useless unless you've committed a crime. And even then they rarely do DNA testing. -
2020-04-24 at 4:22 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-24 at 4:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Are you really trying to deny these so-called "vaccines" contain thimerosal and ethylmercury and all kinds of other toxic elements??
Nobody said that they don't. Thimerosal and ethyl mercury are absolutely not the same as elemental mercury, nor are they present in anywhere near dangerous levels. Thimerosal has actually been removed from most vaccines just to get people to shut up about it.
Like casper suggested you get significantly more mercury from a single serving of fish.
You implied that the CDC was fabricating numbers of people injured by vaccines - where are you getting contradictory numbers from? -
2020-04-24 at 4:27 AM UTCNow you know you ain’t gonna get no answer to that Aldra.😁The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-24 at 4:28 AM UTCSpectral puts down his 40th can of tuna this month as thousands of thoughts rattle around the tin can on his shoulders.
-
2020-04-24 at 4:35 AM UTCYou are NEVER going to get credible data from the pharmaceutical and medical industries, because they have a HUGE conflict of interest. And that huge conflict of interest is the trillions of dollars they make for themselves flogging their toxic poisons. You wouldn't assign bank robbers to investigate their own bank robberies, would you? What would be the point in that? It's not in their financial interest to reveal the death and disease and affliction they inflict onto the general population. It's only logical and sensible to assume they have zero credibility, when it comes to assessing the dangers of the very products they flog. And no one else can compile the data either, because the common man doesn't have access to the required data only the bank robbers themselves have access to, to which everyone else is restricted from accessing. Funny how that happens, eh? Regardless, we still have a ton of data we can collect on our own to prove vaccines are deadly. We have solid and documented examples of people becoming permanently disabled or killed immediately after receiving a "vaccine", who were otherwise perfectly healthy right up until the administration of it. We have thousands and thousands of those documented examples, and anybody and their dog can look them up for themselves.
(edit)
And I don't eat fish, because it has mercury in it. -
2020-04-24 at 4:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL You are NEVER going to get credible data from the pharmaceutical and medical industries, because they have a HUGE conflict of interest. And that huge conflict of interest is the trillions of dollars they make for themselves flogging their toxic poisons. You wouldn't assign bank robbers to investigate their own bank robberies, would you? What would be the point in that? It's not in their financial interest to reveal the death and disease and affliction they inflict onto the general population. It's only logical and sensible to assume they have zero credibility, when it comes to assessing the dangers of the very products they flog. And no one else can compile the data either, because the common man doesn't have access to the required data only the bank robbers themselves have access to, to which everyone else is restricted from accessing. Funny how that happens, eh? Regardless, we still have a ton of data we can collect on our own to prove vaccines are deadly. We have solid and documented examples of people becoming permanently disabled or killed immediately after receiving a "vaccine", who were otherwise perfectly healthy right up until the administration of it. We have thousands and thousands of those documented examples, and anybody and their dog can look them up for themselves.
(edit)
And I don't eat fish, because it has mercury in it.
What about everyone I've ever known that were administered vaccines growing up? Or their family members? And so on? -
2020-04-24 at 4:42 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:43 AM UTCEvery drug has that 0.00007% chance of causing harm.
-
2020-04-24 at 4:44 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:44 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:47 AM UTC
-
2020-04-24 at 4:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL we still have a ton of data we can collect on our own to prove vaccines are deadly. We have solid and documented examples of people becoming permanently disabled or killed immediately after receiving a "vaccine", who were otherwise perfectly healthy right up until the administration of it. We have thousands and thousands of those documented examples, and anybody and their dog can look them up for themselves.
where -
2020-04-24 at 4:49 AM UTCIts called hard facts. Science.
-
2020-04-24 at 4:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Where did you get that number? From the bank robbers?
It’s an arbitrary number duhhhh.
But every drug has that minuscule % of possibility to cause harm.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Its called hard facts. Science.
Nahhh, not this time, but the point still stands. -
2020-04-24 at 5:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Singling them out for what? We can't even accurately test for mental illness. There are some markers but none are definitive. That's why they're called mental disorders and not mental diseases.
they call it mental disorder because theres nothing clinically or biologically wrong with their brain other than the way they think that is different from the rest of the population.If you're worried about a DNA database giving you away, get rid of the phone in your pocket. Its way more revealing than your DNA.
DNA can give more than just you away. it can be triangulated thru you, your niece and nephew back to your granddad who lives in mexhico who never take any test of any kind.
DNA data can also be used to prefabricate evidences to frame someone important, of course not mere garderner like you.
but DNAs are just protein molecules that can be assembled, disassembled, and reassembled in a lab.DNA is pretty useless unless you've committed a crime. And even then they rarely do DNA testing.
yet. -
2020-04-24 at 5:10 AM UTCVinny post didnt read
