User Controls

Huawei making phones without any US chips at all

  1. #21
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny but what about the environment ?

    a crt monitor consumes 9.7 times as much energy as an led monitor does, and therefore emits as much CO² as an led monitor.

    and we know what oxides of carbons are;

    their bad. very, very bad.

    I'm not an environmental hoax nutjob.
  2. #22
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I'm not an environmental hoax nutjob.

    ive become one just to spite you.
  3. #23
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ive become one just to spite you.

    Volcanoes spew out more co2 than the rest of the entire planet does in 100 years. It's just another lame cash cow hoax to rob people of their hard-earned money.
  4. #24
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country The mistake was that Trump forbade US firms to sell to Huawei. That's quite a lot different than forbidding Huawei to sell to the US. It's a decision that will come back to haunt America bigly. No company, no matter who or where, can ever trust their US suppliers ever again.

    that is your uninformed take on the matter.
  5. #25
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country https://www.marketwatch.com/story/huawei-appears-to-be-doing-just-fine-without-american-chips-2019-12-01?link=MW_latest_news

    The main cellular chipset is Huawei's own Kirin 990 5G. Qualcomm and Intel need not apply.

    Banning US firms from doing business with Huawei was a massive mistake, the biggest that Trump has made, as it has made everyone else skittish about doing business with America.

    Thanks obama
  6. #26
    Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Volcanoes spew out more co2 than the rest of the entire planet does in 100 years. It's just another lame cash cow hoax to rob people of their hard-earned money.

    According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world's volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide.
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/

    Really I dislike that answer, as it blames the consumers of fossil fuels, instead of the producers (of course).
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. #27
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/

    Really I dislike that answer, as it blames the consumers of fossil fuels, instead of the producers (of course).

    Slow down Greta
  8. #28
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/

    Really I dislike that answer, as it blames the consumers of fossil fuels, instead of the producers (of course).

    Did you really just shit out a source from the very same US government who are pushing the global warming scam I'm talking about? That's like quoting the bank robbers on how they didn't rob any banks. If you have an actual credible source for your claims, please post them, but posting sources from a bunch of dishonest thieves won't get you very far with me.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. #29
    "global warming scam"
  10. #30
    Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Did you really just shit out a source from the very same US government who are pushing the global warming scam I'm talking about? That's like quoting the bank robbers on how they didn't rob any banks. If you have an actual credible source for your claims, please post them, but posting sources from a bunch of dishonest thieves won't get you very far with me.

    The average atmospheric CO2 level are rising, anyone can prove that with some simple apparatus.
  11. #31
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country The average atmospheric CO2 level are rising, anyone can prove that with some simple apparatus.

    CO² is good for Earth and all of her creatures.
  12. #32
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker CO² is good for Earth and all of her creatures.

    Uh
  13. #33
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Uh

  14. #34
    Hit me with that Mesozoic shit
  15. #35
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Hit me with that Mesozoic shit

    Afraid you might be taught something that will shake your fragile ego. You obviously did not watch the information.
  16. #36
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Afraid you might be taught something that will shake your fragile ego. You obviously did not watch the information.

    If you knew what the Mesozoic was you wouldn't have said that. Nobody is arguing that plants take in CO2. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant life, as we see in the Mesozoic era where plants and oxygen were bountiful and mega fauna thrived. The world was also significantly hotter due to the greenhouse effect. Most of the world was jungle.

    This is why the arctic is melting, and why you hear about the 'polar vortex'. Always makes me laugh when Fox uses this term when talking about weather but still denies that climate change is a thing.

    But you are not a person of reason. You are a sheep. You only believe in wolves if your shepard tells you to.
  17. #37
    Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    According to the CO2 meter built into the building at my last job, CO2 in the office was anywhere from 320 to 800ppm. At 800 ppm you could kinda tell that the office was getting stuffy. The 320 ppm reading was on a quiet day (not many people in) with a good westerly breeze bringing fresh Atlantic air

    Anyway, keeping in mind that CO2 makes us feel drowsy and stuffy, at what level do we say that using the air we all breath as a rubbish dump for waste gas is unacceptable?
  18. #38
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace If you knew what the Mesozoic was you wouldn't have said that. Nobody is arguing that plants take in CO2. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant life, as we see in the Mesozoic era where plants and oxygen were bountiful and mega fauna thrived. The world was also significantly hotter due to the greenhouse effect. Most of the world was jungle.

    This is why the arctic is melting, and why you hear about the 'polar vortex'. Always makes me laugh when Fox uses this term when talking about weather but still denies that climate change is a thing.

    But you are not a person of reason. You are a sheep. You only believe in wolves if your shepard tells you to.

    If you knew what I knew you would know and would have to be told.
  19. #39
    If I knew I would still have to be told this knowledge I know?

    OK boomer
  20. #40
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace If you knew what the Mesozoic was you wouldn't have said that. Nobody is arguing that plants take in CO2. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant life, as we see in the Mesozoic era where plants and oxygen were bountiful and mega fauna thrived. The world was also significantly hotter due to the greenhouse effect. Most of the world was jungle.

    This is why the arctic is melting, and why you hear about the 'polar vortex'. Always makes me laugh when Fox uses this term when talking about weather but still denies that climate change is a thing.

    But you are not a person of reason. You are a sheep. You only believe in wolves if your shepard tells you to.

    How exactly is picking the pockets of people just making it from paycheck to paycheck going to solve your global warming hoax?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
Jump to Top