User Controls

What would realistically happen if the U.S. pulled out from every war and international conflict they are involved in?

  1. #21
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by DietPiano Then maybe you should PM him smarty pants

    A thread is the same thing as a PM but others can chime in, such as yourself, which is what I want. Thank you for being a part of this. I love you. /heart emoji goes here
  2. #22
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The US would go bankrupt and mass hunger would ensue. The US economy relies heavily upon the invasions of other countries. Without that gross domestic product of inflicting suffering and pain and death onto the world scene, they would no longer exist.
  3. #23
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny did you lost yours at a young age ?

    Did you lose yours? I know where mine is.
  4. #24
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Mutually assured destruction. The reasoning that, if every country had long-range nuclear capability, no one would fire on one another, or risk destroying their own nation. That's why the US wants to keep nuclear capability out of the hands of other countries, so then it can just gleefully go in and arrogantly topple other countries for its oil company masters whenever it feels like it, and make a ton of cash in the process.
  5. #25
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Mutually assured destruction. The reasoning that, if every country had long-range nuclear capability, no one would fire on one another, or risk destroying their own nation. That's why the US wants to keep nuclear capability out of the hands of other countries, so then it can just gleefully go in and arrogantly topple other countries for its oil company masters whenever it feels like it, and make a ton of cash in the process.

    So do you argue for nuclear weapons capability for the DPRK or Iran?
  6. #26
    Originally posted by mmQ A thread is the same thing as a PM but others can chime in, such as yourself, which is what I want. Thank you for being a part of this. I love you. /heart emoji goes here

    tee hee hee: yeah but then you don't know that he will see your message!!
  7. #27
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker So do you argue for nuclear weapons capability for the DPRK or Iran?

    Absolutely. Mutually assured destruction only makes sense if EVERYONE has the ability to destroy the other.
  8. #28
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Absolutely. Mutually assured destruction only makes sense if EVERYONE has the ability to destroy the other.

    You know better, stop.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. #29
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I mean, even if an evil dictator had long-range nuclear capability, that wouldn't automatically translate to they'd attack. Even an idiot knows when their own life is in danger.
  10. #30
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I mean, even if an evil dictator had long-range nuclear capability, that wouldn't automatically translate to they'd attack. Even an idiot knows when their own life is in danger.

    Anyone with an OZ of strategic sense cautioned Hitler against many fatal errors. You can't let mad mean have nukes.
  11. #31
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Anyone with an OZ of strategic sense cautioned Hitler against many fatal errors. You can't let mad mean have nukes.

    Totally different situation. Hitler actually had the nuclear capability and the USA stole it from them. The US couldn't fire a nuclear warhead at Hitler, because they weren't ready. Hitler was already way ahead of them and didn't fire.
  12. #32
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Totally different situation. Hitler actually had the nuclear capability and the USA stole it from them. The US couldn't fire a nuclear warhead at Hitler, because they weren't ready. Hitler was already way ahead of them and didn't fire.

    you really make me laugh sometimes
  13. #33
    Octavian motherfucker
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Totally different situation. Hitler actually had the nuclear capability and the USA stole it from them. The US couldn't fire a nuclear warhead at Hitler, because they weren't ready. Hitler was already way ahead of them and didn't fire.


  14. #34
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker you really make me laugh sometimes

    Everyone and their dog should know America hired all the German scientists who were working on the A-bomb after the war. First they stole some of the technology, developed by the Germans, then they stole their scientists. This is a fact of history.
  15. #35
    Octavian motherfucker
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Everyone and their dog should know America hired all the German scientists who were working on the A-bomb after the war. First they stole some of the technology, developed by the Germans, then they stole their scientists. This is a fact of history.

    Everyone knows that as fact dumbass but there was no German prototype that Hitler could have used. Considering the damage brought down upon a once beautiful Berlin, even I would have had no reservations of annihilating any European country with the bomb. The war was lost so what else would he have had to lose by using it?
  16. #36
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I think he could have used it, but he didn't want to tip off the world that he had it. He wanted to perfect it first, make sure it would have the most guaranteed and most widespread destructive capability before unleashing it. Once you use it, everyone knows you have it, so you have to make the first one count. He simply ran out of time.
  17. #37
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Everyone and their dog should know America hired all the German scientists who were working on the A-bomb after the war. First they stole some of the technology, developed by the Germans, then they stole their scientists. This is a fact of history.

    You are referring to operation paperclip which took place after the war and after we had the bomb. The scientist who worked on the Manhattan Project fled Germany before and during the war. Hitler did not have a nuclear weapon. If he had Moscow would have been ash. But you're just trollin'
  18. #38
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Anyone with an OZ of strategic sense cautioned Hitler against many fatal errors. You can't let mad mean have nukes.

    people who have nukes turn into mad and mean eventually.

    power corrupts and nuclear power corrupts nuclearly.
  19. #39
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Did you lose yours? I know where mine is.

    you havent lost yours ?

    60yo virgin ?
  20. #40
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny you havent lost yours ?

    60yo virgin ?

    It's not lost it's in the trunk of a 1973 Plymouth Fury III. Like I said I didn't lose I know right where I left it.

    In fact it was this color

Jump to Top