User Controls
FORGET ABOUT ALL THIS FORUM
-
2015-10-24 at 2:37 AM UTC
>implying God is not inherently intertwined with our existence whether we recognize it or not
U funny chum
>Implying superstition is somehow superior to rationality
-1
Don't make me bust out the fedora. -
2015-10-24 at 3:15 AM UTC
'Rights' don't exists. You don't have an inherrent right to anything just because you exist. That being said, murder in self-defense is ok by me.
That's interesting, it seems like you were all about natural rights not too long ago. Why the change of heart, or is it?False. A "right" is not vested in you by the authority of man but by that of God. In this life the Creator bestowed upon us several inalienable rights such as Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. My government was build upon the precept that these rights cannot be taken away by any law of man. The bill of rights grants me everything necessary to partake in these rights. Through the right to bear army both my life and liberty are secured. Through my government was instilled with the restrictions us Americans like to call The Bill O'Rights. These restrictions on the government such as not prosecuting individuals for their speech or self expression, allowing the individuals to bear and keep arms as well as freely organize themselves ensure my ability to maintain my own rights. It is lamentable that these restrictions on the government are being lifted under the guise of gun control and hate speech laws.
As I have said before, FUCK THE DEMOCRACY! BRING BACK THE REPUBLIC!
When your argument is founded on what might be the most tenuous premise of our age I think that should be a sign you're fucked, but I mean let's say there is a god or whatever. How does it follow from "we were made by some anthropomorphic creator character" to "the american bill of rights (and specifically my personal interpretation of it) is divine truth"? I mean I'm sure this is going to turn into you having some special access to the truth in the end (particularly amusing would be "He told me so") but I'm in the mood for a chuckle so by all means, present your post-hoc attempt to justify the bill of rights from the given premise that there is a sky father or whatever. -
2015-10-24 at 3:27 AM UTCThe Constitution itself declares there is a God. Are you saying the founding fathers were deluded?
-
2015-10-24 at 3:47 AM UTC
The Constitution itself declares there is a God. Are you saying the founding fathers were deluded?
If you are talking about the U.S. Constitution you're an idiot shooting his mouth off once again. Or in your case should I say still? The only mention of "God" in that document is in the signatory section where it says "Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven". The use of the word "Lord" here is not a religious reference however. This was a common way of expressing the date, in both religious and secular contexts.
Try again Spectard. -
2015-10-24 at 4:03 AM UTC
That's interesting, it seems like you were all about natural rights not too long ago. Why the change of heart, or is it?
I ain't about rights. I'm about basic human decency, the fact no one has an inherrent 'god given' right to life does not mean we should go around murdering people. Or that life isn't precious. -
2015-10-24 at 4:05 AM UTC
The Constitution itself declares there is a God. Are you saying the founding fathers were deluded?
Anyone who believes in any sort of omnipotent being such as god is fundamentally deluding themselves. -
2015-10-24 at 4:08 AM UTC
"He told me so".
Ayyyy lmao, if he says that i'll join you in that chuckle. But i know tiny negro is smarter than that. -
2015-10-24 at 5:20 AM UTC
That's interesting, it seems like you were all about natural rights not too long ago. Why the change of heart, or is it?
When your argument is founded on what might be the most tenuous premise of our age I think that should be a sign you're fucked, but I mean let's say there is a god or whatever. How does it follow from "we were made by some anthropomorphic creator character" to "the american bill of rights (and specifically my personal interpretation of it) is divine truth"? I mean I'm sure this is going to turn into you having some special access to the truth in the end (particularly amusing would be "He told me so") but I'm in the mood for a chuckle so by all means, present your post-hoc attempt to justify the bill of rights from the given premise that there is a sky father or whatever.
Ahhh Lanny you leftist cuck. At what stage was it implied there was any sort of anthropomorphic creator? I was created, this is a fact as it is a fact you too were created. We were not molded by some old man in the sky but rather emerged into this universe through the circumstances set forth by a power higher than ours. I take no written word but the word that was revealed through the holy spirit to the followers of Chrestus as divine truth. So no the American Bill of Rights is not an revelation of God but, as I said in my original post, an edict of men. But as an edict of men it embarks to fulfill the requirements that constitute a restricted government and a liberated populace. If you wish to have a real discussion on the matter you must not equate my position to dogmatic exotercism. Realize my genuinity and look past your preconceptions regarding my views. In time you will see I am right.
So I guess to tldr this there is no anthropomorphic creator and the bill of rights are not divine truth. But the bill of rights allows men to do what is necessary to live, and to live in liberty and pursue happiness. It lays a groundwork to ensure that man is slave to only that which he himself willingly submits to. Maybe its not perfect. But its a damn good start. -
2015-10-24 at 9:42 AM UTC
The only mention of "God" in that document is in the signatory section where it says "Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven". …
Wrong again, fuck-o.
"We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal..." -
2015-10-24 at 1:06 PM UTC
Wrong again, fuck-o.
Created ≠God dumbass
"We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal…" -
2015-10-24 at 4:14 PM UTC
Created ≠God dumbass
"Created" implies the creation of the first man, which means the man before the first man didn't exist, so he wasn't around to create himself. Therefore, it had to be someone else who created the first man - someone who isn't man. It's like the chicken and the egg. -
2015-10-24 at 5:07 PM UTC[size=6]Theists are the most ridiculous superstition believing idiots on the planet[/size]
But i make an exception for lil nigga'. -
2015-10-24 at 5:08 PM UTC[size=7]JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL BEAMS[/size]
-
2015-10-24 at 7:35 PM UTC
Wrong again, fuck-o.
"We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal…"
Except §m£ÂgØL. -
2015-10-24 at 10:15 PM UTC
"Created" implies the creation of the first man, which means the man before the first man didn't exist, so he wasn't around to create himself. Therefore, it had to be someone else who created the first man - someone who isn't man. It's like the chicken and the egg.
Someone ≠God dumbass -
2015-10-24 at 10:20 PM UTCPro Tip Spectard: The founding fathers were largely of the Masonic order. Masonry requires that you believe in a higher power. Even if you believe that higher power is your recliner. It does not require that you believe in the God of the Judea-Christian writings known as the Bible. Nowhere, in the Constitution does the word God appear. You are a Canadian with an inferior constitution so it's understandable why you you're so confused...
... All the time... -
2021-03-13 at 4:10 PM UTCHu
