User Controls
Free energy coming soon
-
2019-07-02 at 6:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I liked Die Hard too (two)
i rewatched the whole die hard triology and i teared up at the level of freedoms there once were that i'll never get to enjoy in this lifetime.
back in those days it was ok to smoke, in the airport, while buying your tickets, while waiting for your luggages in the luggage claim area, and in the plane ! -
2019-07-02 at 6:52 PM UTCand on topic ;
our problem with energy isnt whether its free or not free.
our problem is that there are energies that are freely available that we are unable to harness and therefore they remain 'free' while those that we can are controlled by the power that be and are made to be not free.
there's really no reason why energies that we can harness, such as fire woods and LPG and oils cant be free and have to be bought. -
2019-07-02 at 7:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator That's not what free means. It costs you to access it is what makes it not free. Every energy source ever outputs more from its dormant state once initiated, that's the point of an energy source. That doesn't make the energy source free. You are simply retarded.
That's crazy. -
2019-07-02 at 8:23 PM UTC
-
2019-07-02 at 8:28 PM UTCwere one day closer
-
2019-07-02 at 8:33 PM UTC
-
2019-07-02 at 8:35 PM UTCNikola Tesla already proved that the fabric of reality itself is made up of energy, which can be tapped into with the right equipment. The government murdered him for it and stole all his papers and property, under the pretext of national security. Skunkworks and Boeing and Ratheon and all those clowns already figured this out 70 years ago. They know the energy is there, and they know anyone can access it with just a few dollars worth of equipment, but they don't want that. You see, they know what's best for you, even if you don't.
-
2019-07-02 at 9 PM UTCNikola Tesla didn't prove shit.
-
2019-07-02 at 9 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny but thats not really the problem, is it.
no.
the problem is we being having to PAY to be able to tap into it.
That's not a problem either unless you are cheap and poor, I expect to pay for any goods and services I receive...wanting free shit all the time is about as cuckish as it gets. -
2019-07-02 at 9:03 PM UTCAnd the point is finding shit with a large concentration of energy is that we can make it flow to a lower energy gradient to use it in order to do Work. All of reality is made out of energy but that doesn't give us anything. So is whatever we want to paper. The problem is finding a gradient we can tap.
-
2019-07-02 at 9:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Nikola Tesla didn't prove shit.
In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Assuming that the standard model of cosmology is correct, the best current measurements indicate that dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe. The mass–energy of dark matter and ordinary (baryonic) matter contribute 27% and 5%, respectively, and other components such as neutrinos and photons contribute a very small amount. The density of dark energy is very low (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space. Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, representing a constant energy density filling space homogeneously, and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to the zero-point radiation of space i.e. the vacuum energy. Scalar fields that change in space can be difficult to distinguish from a cosmological constant because the change may be extremely slow.
Brooklyn Eagle, July 10, 1932, Nikola Tesla states: "I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. Cosmic ray investigation is a subject that is very close to me. I was the first to discover these rays and I naturally feel toward them as I would toward my own flesh and blood. I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan. This new power for the driving of the world’s machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities." -
2019-07-02 at 9:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the problem is we being having to PAY to be able to tap into it.
Are you fucking dumb.
Of course you can harness it for free. Go set up a petroleum extraction and refinement plant in international waters to harvest energy for free without paying... Oh wait, you can't? Why, because it would cost too much and you don't have the know how? You can't harvest the raw materials with your bare hands? Maybe you get a loan and pay some people to help you out, buy the materials. How do you pay back the bank's investment? Maybe you start selling the harnessed to people for money... Congratulations you have just come around to the concept of running a fucking business in the energy industry. How is that a problem u muckwit? -
2019-07-02 at 9:17 PM UTCYou guys do know you can buy a Crookes radiometer on ebay, right.
It supplies literally infinite free energy.
Basically the bulb is a partial vacuum. The black side moves away from light, and the light side moves towards the light. The effect can be quite pronounced.
However the Crookes Radiometer produces no (zero) worthwhile energy at all. It won't spin a generator or anything like that. -
2019-07-02 at 9:20 PM UTCI have a light ball that operates strictly off radiant energy. Put it in a dark room and it will light up indefinitely.
-
2019-07-02 at 9:21 PM UTC
-
2019-07-02 at 9:23 PM UTCthe rooty will use LFTRs and the tooty will use tokomak
what will the frooty do? -
2019-07-02 at 9:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Assuming that the standard model of cosmology is correct, the best current measurements indicate that dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe. The mass–energy of dark matter and ordinary (baryonic) matter contribute 27% and 5%, respectively, and other components such as neutrinos and photons contribute a very small amount. The density of dark energy is very low (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space. Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, representing a constant energy density filling space homogeneously, and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to the zero-point radiation of space i.e. the vacuum energy. Scalar fields that change in space can be difficult to distinguish from a cosmological constant because the change may be extremely slow.
Brooklyn Eagle, July 10, 1932, Nikola Tesla states: "I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. Cosmic ray investigation is a subject that is very close to me. I was the first to discover these rays and I naturally feel toward them as I would toward my own flesh and blood. I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan. This new power for the driving of the world’s machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities."
Tesla specifically said he wouldn't release details in his new source of free energy and never published shit about shit on the subject. Therefore he didn't prove shit.
QED -
2019-07-02 at 10:05 PM UTC
-
2019-07-02 at 10:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL No, it feeds off radiant emissions present at the location it sits. It's energy source is electromagnetic radiation (radio waves, gamma rays, X-rays), which exist even in the dark.
So it works off radiant emissions, yet works in locations where radiant emissions are blocked.
I'm guessing it's just simple phosphor based glow-in-the-dark paint.
-
2019-07-02 at 10:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country So it works off radiant emissions, yet works in locations where radiant emissions are blocked.
I'm guessing it's just simple phosphor based glow-in-the-dark paint.
I thought so, too, at first, but it's not. It collects electromagnetic energy. Just because it's in a dark closet doesn't mean there is no electromagnetic energy in the closet. Electromagnetic energy is everywhere.
