User Controls

deepdotweb.com seized

  1. #61
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Sudo I don't think you know anything about this and you're just saying it to fit the narrative you follow

    True.
  2. #62
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL True.

    uh huh

    cite something specific and concrete
  3. #63
    Tesla Coil Tuskegee Airman
    11:11 keeps showing up
  4. #64
    Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ghost You are just another conspiracy nutter like Jigaboo johnson and totse2k1. THE GOVERNMENT LETS PEOPLE BUY AND SELL KILOGRAMS OF FENTANYL MAN ITS SO THEY CAN CONTROL US MAN AND THE REASON THEY BUST SMALL TIME USERS AND DEALERS IS JUST TO KEEP UP APPEARANCES MAN IT'S ALL A BIG CONSPIRACY

    Fucking bullshit. They have no idea how to control us because we are the hydra that grows two heads every time you chop one off.

    The trick is to cut off DNMs without removing the use of Tor entirely. That would just look like censorship. LEOs care to take down sales of stuff like fent and child porn but they honestly wouldn't give a fuck about weed etc.
  5. #65
    Originally posted by Ghost You are just another conspiracy nutter like Jigaboo johnson and totse2k1. THE GOVERNMENT LETS PEOPLE BUY AND SELL KILOGRAMS OF FENTANYL MAN ITS SO THEY CAN CONTROL US MAN AND THE REASON THEY BUST SMALL TIME USERS AND DEALERS IS JUST TO KEEP UP APPEARANCES MAN IT'S ALL A BIG CONSPIRACY

    Fucking bullshit. They have no idea how to control us because we are the hydra that grows two heads every time you chop one off.

    Irony...it's what's for lunch (along with a little pot of cottage cheese)
  6. #66
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    deepdotpenetration
  7. #67
    Ghost Black Hole
    Unless someone can provide some proof that the government 'doesn't care' about drugs then you are wrong and making stuff up to fit your own conspiracy narrative.

    I've heard better conspiracies from crackheads
  8. #68
    Originally posted by Ghost Unless someone can provide some proof that the government 'doesn't care' about drugs then you are wrong and making stuff up to fit your own conspiracy narrative.

    I've heard better conspiracies from crackheads

    Which government? lot of South American ones seem to like the money it brings in.
  9. #69
    Ghost Black Hole
    I doubt that, they banned the import of basic chemicals like sulfuric acid to fuck over cocaine manufacturers and most of the money goes to communist groups like FARC who want to overthrow the government.

  10. #70
    Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Ghost Unless someone can provide some proof that the government 'doesn't care' about drugs then you are wrong and making stuff up to fit your own conspiracy narrative.

    I've heard better conspiracies from crackheads

    LEOs themselves have said they are focusing on stuff like fentanyl and black markets for digital goods like fullz, CCs, child porn etc. Of course given a choice they would take down the deep web but where do you think it ranks on their order of priorities? It's not even 1% of the international drug trade.
  11. #71
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Sudo uh huh

    cite something specific and concrete

    No. You post the law you keep blathering on about which makes posting hotlinks to illegal content illegal.
  12. #72
    Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No. You post the law you keep blathering on about which makes posting hotlinks to illegal content illegal.

    Post links to child pornography and test it out.
  13. #73
    cite something specific and concrete

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. #74
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    they did have pedo links on there iirc


    .
  15. #75
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

  16. #76
    Speaking of Oceans there is someone on here who could only name 1 of them..I won't mention who though so as not to embarrass them.
  17. #77
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    its known as solicitation speckles, ya dumb fuckhead

    Solicitation is the act of offering, or attempting to purchase, goods or services. Legal status may be specific to the time or place where it occurs.[clarification needed] The crime of "solicitation to commit a crime" occurs when a person encourages, "solicits, requests, commands, importunes or otherwise attempts to cause" another person to attempt or commit a crime, with the purpose of thereby facilitating the attempt or commission of that crime.[1]:698–702


    .
  18. #78
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No. You post the law you keep blathering on about which makes posting hotlinks to illegal content illegal.

    muppet^, lol


    .
  19. #79
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The feds are lying. Making money from hosting hotlinks to illegal content is not a crime. These lawless ghouls just make new laws up as they go along. You won't be able to find a single law anywhere which prohibits posting referral links to illegal activities or content, and that's because it is protected free speech, and the Constitution is the ultimate authority under law, not the bedtime stories of a bunch of lawless criminals with badges and guns. And if they didn't pay taxes, well, that's another thing entirely.

    ohmahdays


    .
  20. #80
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Posting links to pornography is also not a crime. There is no law in existence today which prohibits the posting of links to child pornography.
Jump to Top