User Controls

Disclosure bullshit

  1. #21
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Such as the computer chip.

    That's not advanced, it's been around for quite a while now...and sure it was advanced back then..but then at some point so was a fucking spoon.
  2. #22
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson That's not advanced, it's been around for quite a while now…and sure it was advanced back then..but then at some point so was a fucking spoon.

    Without the computer chip, none of this would have been possible. That's why the bad aliens shared it.
  3. #23
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Without the computer chip, none of this would have been possible. That's why the bad aliens shared it.

    Can you prove that? I'm pretty sure the spoon came before the computer chip...and even then...that doesn't correlate to anything regarding aliens.
  4. #24
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Can you prove that? I'm pretty sure the spoon came before the computer chip…and even then…that doesn't correlate to anything regarding aliens.

    It's all about speeding up the timeline. That's why they did it. It would have taken us several thousand more years to come up with it on our own, if at all.
  5. #25
    Originally posted by -SpectraL It would have taken us several thousand more years to come up with it on our own, if at all.

    What evidence do you have to support that?

    The computer chip isn't "that" advanced...it's still basically millions of tiny transistors...a technology that already existed before the computer chip...the only innovation was shrinking it down...the science of which wasn't "unworldly".
  6. #26
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson What evidence do you have to support that?

    Well, for one thing, a computer chip hadn't been invented over the entire six thousand years man has been here, then it pops up all of a sudden and technology takes a massive leap forward in just a few decades. You think that is a reasonable development without external interference?
  7. #27
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, for one thing, a computer chip hadn't been invented over the entire six thousand years man has been here, then it pops up all of a sudden and technology takes a massive leap forward in just a few decades. You think that is a reasonable development without external interference?

    We've only been here 6 thousand years huh?

    And again, it didn't just "pop up suddenly" it was a natural progression from vacuum tubes, transistors, miniaturization of those transistors to the computer chip etc...there was nothing "sudden" about it.
  8. #28
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson We've only been here 6 thousand years huh?

    And again, it didn't just "pop up suddenly" it was a natural progression from vacuum tubes, transistors, miniaturization of those transistors to the computer chip etc…there was nothing "sudden" about it.

    All high-level technology has appeared in less than the past 100 years all at once. You think that's a reasonable natural development?
  9. #29
    Originally posted by -SpectraL All high-level technology has appeared in less than the past 100 years all at once.

    No it didn't..."standing on the shoulders of giants" etc...

    All "high level technology" as you call it is a result of past innovation.
  10. #30
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No it didn't…"standing on the shoulders of giants" etc…

    All "high level technology" as you call it is a result of past innovation.

    The innovation should have been spread evenly across the timeline, or at least exponential, but it was neither of those things. It was sudden. It all came within the span of less than 100 years. Engines, phones, electricity, computers.. it all came practically instantly, relative to the rest of the timeline. If you charted that, you would have a line which gradually rises over the past six thousand years, then skyrockets almost 90 degrees straight up. And you think that's normal?
  11. #31
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The innovation should have been spread evenly across the timeline

    Who told you that? ..and who told you it wasn't?

    Abacuses have been around for a couple of thousand years...they were the first artificial computers (debatable)...
  12. #32
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Who told you that? ..and who told you it wasn't?

    Abacuses have been around for a couple of thousand years…they were the first artificial computers (debatable)…

    That would be like a child with average intelligence which grows up demonstrating no truly outstanding talents, and then at the age of 60 suddenly presents itself as a particle physicist, a rocket scientist, a professor of quantum mechanics, and a great philosopher. You could say, sure, that could happen, but that's not really true. It can't happen. It's not normal.
  13. #33
    Originally posted by -SpectraL That would be like a child with average intelligence which grows up demonstrating no truly outstanding talents, and then at the age of 60 suddenly presents itself as a particle physicist, a rocket scientist, a professor of quantum mechanics, and a great philosopher. You could say, sure, that could happen, but that's not really true. It can't happen. It's not normal.

    Again there was no "all of a sudden"...the "timeline" of computer development goes back to the abacus...and beyond. You're either being very selective in what you accept as progression, are unaware of history OR...dismissing anything that contradicts your preconceived notions and narrative...I'm leaning towards it being the latter.

    EDIT: You're also basing your whole thinking on the way YOU think things "should" be (re: timelines and accelerated progression)
  14. #34
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again there was no "all of a sudden"…the "timeline" of computer development goes back to the abacus…and beyond. You're either being very selective in what you accept as progression, are unaware of history OR…dismissing anything that contradicts your preconceived notions and narrative…I'm leaning towards it being the latter.

    EDIT: You're also basing your whole thinking on the way YOU think things "should" be (re: timelines and accelerated progression)

    Comparing the abacus to a modern 386x computer is like comparing a shack in the back yard to the Taj Mahal. There's just no comparison, and therefore no real point. Inventions like the modern computer don't just appear overnight, but relatively speaking, relative to the entire timeline, it DID.
  15. #35
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Comparing the abacus to a modern 386x computer is like comparing a shack in the back yard to the Taj Mahal.

    Agreed...but then I didn't compare them...the abacus was part of the LONG TIMELINE of computer development...the one that you claimed was "all of a sudden"...

    Try to keep up.
  16. #36
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Then we have "The Book of Enoch", an ancient scroll which documents the bad angels by name who supplied humans with advanced technology, instruments of war and alchemy, during the time of the Nephilim. This account makes it clear we are not alone.
  17. #37
    Yes and we have Lord of the Rings too which details how the one ring rules over all the others...

    My god...
  18. #38
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
  19. #39
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Yes and we have Lord of the Rings too which details how the one ring rules over all the others…

    My god…

    Not quite. The author of Lord of the Rings makes it clear it is a work of fiction. The authors of the accounts I am referring do not, and specifically state they are relaying actual events.
  20. #40
    Technologist victim of incest
    OMG, a debate between Jig and Speccy. This will go on for pages. I’ll check back later. Lololol
Jump to Top