User Controls
If sociopathy were a spectrum...
-
2018-10-23 at 9:25 PM UTC40-50/100
-
2018-10-23 at 9:44 PM UTCWe should drink IRL some time. No homo.
-
2018-10-23 at 10:43 PM UTCLike 65
You call it a spool tier edge thread but you're using the exact same thought process I would go through (age 17 btw). You are trailing my footsteps and being hidden by the shadow
I'm an 83 -
2018-10-23 at 10:47 PM UTCYou always point out that people are exhibiting the same thought process you had as a teenager because that's when you stopped developing intellectually. Being a psychopath has nothing to do with it.
-
2018-10-23 at 10:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick You always point out that people are exhibiting the same thought process you had as a teenager because that's when you stopped developing intellectually. Being a psychopath has nothing to do with it.
No because I lost interest in this bullshit. I developed past the retard barrier where you think you can place everyone into neat little categories because that's totally how the billions of neurons in the brain work, they're exact physical representations of A B and C and now every vague generalizable literature on that category is literally their existence -
2018-10-23 at 10:56 PM UTCYour desperate and endless need for attention is alarming. Get help, son, before its too late.
-
2018-10-23 at 10:56 PM UTC
-
2018-10-23 at 11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Archer please…
The difference between a sociopath and a psychopath is that sociopaths are made, psychopaths are born.
How do you make a sociopath i hear you ask. Good question and i'll tell you. Through horrible fucking trauma, that's how.
Originally posted by Archer513 Sociopaths are made from trauma and are born also.Sociopaths are usually very stupid. Sociopaths are generally more compulsive,where psychopaths are more methodical.
A sociopath will grab you and rape you,a psychopath will charm you or roofie you with pudding pops.
You're not even talking about a real person lmao it's like a character trope -
2018-10-23 at 11:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla No because I lost interest in this bullshit. I developed past the retard barrier where you think you can place everyone into neat little categories because that's totally how the billions of neurons in the brain work, they're exact physical representations of A B and C and now every vague generalizable literature on that category is literally their existence
How do you regard the behaviors associated with what has been described as 'antisocial' and pathological in your own theory of mind? Surely you must have developed your views into a coherent philosophy since you left the field of psychology behind before entering college. -
2018-10-23 at 11:20 PM UTCLow empathy (amygdala)/impulsivity (prefrontal cortex), social influences with these traits.
Are you asking me to explain the existence of evil? It's entropy which is inherent to any system and has almost infinite precursors. Evolution also prefers this because in certain dire situations these cheating type behaviirs increases survivability -
2018-10-23 at 11:35 PM UTCYou can also deconstruct a physical condition by illustrating its process in steps, your understanding introduces nothing new except discarding the label. I'm not saying your beliefs are utterly wrong, just that they aren't new or unique and you tend to misuse them. Your critique is sorely lacking in perspective.
Most graduate programs require a good amount of neurobiology by now (likely more than you've gleaned from the internet) and psychologists are increasingly aware of the mechanism of the things they diagnose. You think they're strict idealists transacting with fictional gestalts, but it's you who is so engrossed in a fantasy rendering of their clinical methods.
What's really remarkable here is that you seem to think the epistemological mistakes you're describing are confined to psychology. You should really take an upper-level philosophy course, Sploo. If you can get over the fact that your teacher is an intellectual peer who you could murder if you wanted, you might learn something valuable to your interests. -
2018-10-23 at 11:41 PM UTCThe physical condition is distinct from the label because they can occur independently of one another, and the reliability of diagnosis is low meaning that the mechanisms clearly aren't apparent/absolutely significant in most cases. They're literally just voted into existence by the APA and then the correlation/causation fallacy does the rest. Clearly the 20 question online personality quiz is probing the inner workings of my brain. You're stupid I don't want to spell everything out for you. And no, the fallacies apply to soft sciences in general
-
2018-10-23 at 11:42 PM UTCI think I just creamed my work pants reading z and gh’s debate. That was really hot ... whoa
Very strange but freaking awesome -
2018-10-24 at 12:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla The physical condition is distinct from the label because they can occur independently of one another, and the reliability of diagnosis is low meaning that the mechanisms clearly aren't apparent/absolutely significant in most cases. They're literally just voted into existence by the APA and then the correlation/causation fallacy does the rest. Clearly the 20 question online personality quiz is probing the inner workings of my brain. You're stupid I don't want to spell everything out for you. And no, the fallacies apply to soft sciences in general
But you aren't asking the really critical questions, Sploo! Why do you think this group has come to identify certain outliers as antisocial? What philosophical underpinnings have provided the basis for psychiatry and other institutions to emerge as authors for any criteria of our mental lives? What social function do they serve outside the immediate context of diagnosis? You have a thread in your hand, and I'm asking you to pull on it. -
2018-10-24 at 1:11 AM UTCIn my mind entropy is closer to a nihilistic outlook than a sociopathic one
-
2018-10-24 at 1:22 AM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 1:23 AM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 3:51 AM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 3:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick But you aren't asking the really critical questions, Sploo! Why do you think this group has come to identify certain outliers as antisocial? What philosophical underpinnings have provided the basis for psychiatry and other institutions to emerge as authors for any criteria of our mental lives? What social function do they serve outside the immediate context of diagnosis? You have a thread in your hand, and I'm asking you to pull on it.
They're called adjectives
I was diagnosed with weird!
The doctor says I have snobby
He's clinically mean
Now give it a fancy scientific name and add it to the dsm -
2018-10-24 at 5:03 AM UTCSociopathy and autism are on the same spectrum.
-100 to 0 is autism, and 0 to +100 is sociopathy. If you are a 0, you are an autistic sociopath.
