User Controls

Scientists Warn the UN of Capitalism's Imminent Demise

  1. stare rape African Astronaut (banned)
    Originally posted by Rizzo in a box im moving to venus, where TRUMP isn't president

    Joke's on you, he bought Venus in the early days of the "Buy A Star" program when it was only known as "The Morning Star"
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. Rizzo in a box African Astronaut [the rapidly lightproof ovariectomy]
    Originally posted by stare rape Joke's on you, he bought Venus in the early days of the "Buy A Star" program when it was only known as "The Morning Star"

    fine fuck it im going back to saturn to worship satan with the rest of my jedi brethren
  3. Originally posted by RisiR † A species of bird, benny. An entire species.

    are those birds by default predator-free to begin with in the nature ?
  4. RisiR † 29 Autism
    That depends. The Dodo, yes. The Moa, no. Don't know about your mother.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Originally posted by RisiR † That depends. The Dodo, yes. The Moa, no. Don't know about your mother.

    and you blames man for the demise of the dodo instead of its natural predator. and how do you know the moa had no natural predators ?

    more speculations ? more hearsays ?
  6. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny and you blames man for the demise of the dodo instead of its natural predator. and how do you know the moa had no natural predators ?

    more speculations ? more hearsays ?

    an update :

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/09/new-find-clears-madagascar-s-first-settlers-wiping-out-world-s-largest-bird
  7. RisiR † 29 Autism
    You got it twisted. Dodos had no predators. Moas had the Haast Eagle who also got extict because of humans because we hunted down their major food source, the moa.

    Posting a sciencemag article to prove you're right shows that you only agree with science when it suits you. You're an idiot. A major misconception here is that you probably believe that I would like the current climate change to be man-made but that's wrong. I'd very much prefer if that wasn't the case. Facts sadly don't work like that, though.
  8. Originally posted by RisiR † You got it twisted. Dodos had no predators.

    1 - fiction.

    2 - not yet. nothing is perpetual in this universe and planet. eventually something are bound to evolve and/or adept to prey on it, like how we did.

    3 - pandas too are facing existential and extinction crisis but it isnt us, human that causes it. the lack of willpower to fuck on their part is.

    4 - your a retard for believing otherwise.
  9. Originally posted by RisiR † Posting a sciencemag article to prove you're right shows that you only agree with science when it suits you.

    no, it proves what i have been saying all these while, that 'scientists' are wrong all the time and its only a matter of when, not if, they discovere so.
  10. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny 2 - not yet. nothing is perpetual in this universe and planet. eventually something are bound to evolve and/or adept to prey on it, like how we did.

    Even if that were true, how is it supposed to be an argument against anthropogenic extinction?
  11. Originally posted by Lanny
    Even if that were true, how is it supposed to be an argument against anthropogenic extinction?

    oh, yea.

    bully me with your big words.

    the point is that extinction happens, anthropogenic or otherwise.

    are primitive human with mere stone tools induced extinctions just as bad the ones caused by modern humans with modern technologies ?
  12. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the point is that extinction happens, anthropogenic or otherwise.

    Again, so what? People die with or without someone killing them, yet we don't consider this an acceptable justification of homicide.

    are primitive human with mere stone tools induced extinctions just as bad the ones caused by modern humans with modern technologies ?

    Sure, the means by which we induce ecological upset doesn't seem particularly relevant,
  13. apt Tuskegee Airman
    nigger
  14. Originally posted by Lanny
    Again, so what? People die with or without someone killing them, yet we don't consider this an acceptable justification of homicide.


    the point is that people die irregardless but these so called 'scientists' keep insisting tgat its we humans that do all the killings,

    based on not even anecdotal, but merely speculative evidences.

    this is the problem.
  15. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by apt
    ITT: Climate change deniers BTFO

  16. apt Tuskegee Airman
    nigger
  17. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by apt Do you get all your opinions from debunked, decade old propaganda films?

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170907073944/https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle

    So you always watch an hour long video you disagree with?
  18. apt Tuskegee Airman
    nigger
  19. apt Tuskegee Airman
    nigger
  20. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Belive the lie I don't care
Jump to Top