User Controls
ATTN: Aldra
-
2016-08-24 at 9:48 AM UTC
chronophiles = time-traveling child molestors
Lmfao, RA2 for lyfe. -
2016-08-24 at 12:27 PM UTC
So then you admit that you calling out sophie isn't actually an issue with his sexual preferences, and that you turn a blind eye to the perceived moral flaws of your jerkoff buddies. Good, I'm glad we're on the same page.
No, we are not on the same page, kid. DaGuru wasn't talking about molesting 4-year-olds, and I wasn't defending him for wanting to molest 4-year-olds either. In fact, I didn't comment or get involved at all in the subject DaGuru raised, nor did I offer a single opinion on the subject; there's a big difference between wanting fuck toddlers and wanting to fuck 12-16 year olds. If DaGuru had said it was OK to fuck toddlers, I would have voiced myself just as I did this sick freak psychomanthis here, whom you defended -
2016-08-25 at 2:18 AM UTC
In fact, I didn't comment or get involved at all in the subject DaGuru raised, nor did I offer a single opinion on the subject;
Which is exactly my point. When it's the guy who jerks you off in every thread your moral self-righteousness is nowhere to be found, but when it's someone who's failed to so consistently stroke your ego then it's stop the presses, society is falling apart, this is the greatest villainy ever perpetrated against mankind. It's obvious to everyone that you're a sycophant with a double standard. -
2016-08-25 at 10:32 AM UTC
Which is exactly my point. When it's the guy who jerks you off in every thread your moral self-righteousness is nowhere to be found, but when it's someone who's failed to so consistently stroke your ego then it's stop the presses, society is falling apart, this is the greatest villainy ever perpetrated against mankind. It's obvious to everyone that you're a sycophant with a double standard.
That's crazy.
-
2016-08-25 at 10:39 AM UTC
That's crazy.
[greentext]>9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation. -
2016-08-25 at 10:41 AM UTCSpectral confirmed for fed.
-
2016-08-25 at 10:50 AM UTCWhat is so hard to comprehend? DaGuru was talking about 12-16 year-olds. I didn't comment. I didn't defend. Psychomathis was talking about 4 year-olds. I did comment. I did berate. Lanny defended psychomanthis, a self-professed fucker-of-four-year-olds. End of story. There's no real contradiction or hypocrisy here.
-
2016-08-25 at 11:05 AM UTC
*What is so hard to comprehend? DaGuru was talking about 12-16 year-olds. I didn't comment. I didn't defend. Psychomathis was talking about 4 year-olds. I did comment. I did berate.
[greentext]>2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!†gambit.[/greentext]Lanny defended psychomanthis, a self-professed fucker-of-four-year-olds. End of story. There's no real contradiction or hypocrisy here.
[greentext]>5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.[/greentext]
[greentext]>9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation.
Fact of the matter is you have double standards. You seem to harp on this 4yo number a lot as well, you probably just ignored this post. Obviously a ploy to spread more disinfo regarding the subject we find ourselves discussing. -
2016-08-25 at 6:36 PM UTCYou did comment and you were on our DaGuru/mine/others' side. You defended our argument of "Bleed, breed".
I'm not making this up. -
2016-08-25 at 6:50 PM UTCIt's obvious that you just want to shit on Psycho because you two had some failed e-relationship in the past or some shit. Hmmm, the editor doesn't work for some reason so this will look more blockish than I want. Bare with me.
I've stated before that I don't thin Psycho is a bad guy and he's clearly no predator. He'd probably take advantage of a kid being touchy and enjoy it but he wouldn't rape a 4 year old. He likes to cuddle and listens to anime music, c'mon.
-
2016-08-25 at 6:51 PM UTC
You did comment and you were on our DaGuru/mine/others' side. You defended our argument of "Bleed, breed".
I'm not making this up.
There have been fake -SpectraLs from time to time. You may be thinking of the fake -SpectraL who resided on Dgf's site, Totseans, where DaGuru also posted. Nowhere on either Totse or Zoklet or elsewhere have I ever agreed with, or condoned, sex with a woman under the legal age. If you have proof to refute this, go ahead and post it, otherwise, stop telling bedtime stories. -
2016-08-25 at 7:19 PM UTCOf course I can't prove this but I have no horse in this race and absolutely no reason to lie.
It's just what I remember. Maybe I'm wrong, I've been before so who knows. I'm just pretty goddamn sure this happened and no it wasn't a fake -SpectarL. Well, maybe it was. Maybe you are the fake SpectraL for all I know and actually also care.
Just, just stop. -
2016-08-25 at 7:35 PM UTC
There have been fake -SpectraLs from time to time. You may be thinking of the fake -SpectraL who resided on Dgf's site, Totseans, where DaGuru also posted. Nowhere on either Totse or Zoklet or elsewhere have I ever agreed with, or condoned, sex with a woman under the legal age. If you have proof to refute this, go ahead and post it, otherwise, stop telling bedtime stories.
[greentext]>19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb†rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation
I can do this all day SpeciaL. -
2016-08-25 at 10:05 PM UTC
[greentext]>19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb†rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation
I can do this all day SpeciaL.
You don't scare me, kid. -
2016-08-25 at 11:34 PM UTC
You don't scare me, kid.
Still proving my point. -
2016-08-26 at 2:03 AM UTCYou don't have a point, you ugly-faced twat.
-
2016-08-26 at 2:38 AM UTC
You don't have a point, you ugly-faced twat.
[greentext]>5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation -
2016-08-26 at 6:13 AM UTCWhat does it matter if Sophie fucking kids? Is it right? No. Should you, at some point, in the correct venue, voice it? Sure, but that would be in the 'Sophie fucking kids' thread, or any thread relevant to his pedophilia. What the fuck does this thread regarding the census in Australia have to do with Sophie and pedophilia? Nothing. Why are you bitching about it here? Shit, even if you are going to shit all over Sophie every time he posts in a thread or makes one asking a legit question not involving his sexual preference, maybe at least contribute to the subject at hand. Why is it so hard for you to do that? What difference do you think you're making by detailing threads like this? None, save you're fucking up the interest, entertainment and knowledge spread with your bullshit.
Also, Lanny didn't defend Sophie's pedophilia at all. He used him as a point of reference. There is a difference.
Please no more "you don't scare me kid" shit. I realize it and have not tried to scare or intimidate you at all. I've actually tried to be really nice about a lot of your dumb shit. I feel sorry for you, honestly, because you seem like a nice person who probably does have things to share and contribute for your age and experience, but youd rather just run around the same shit over and over again all because you don't like this one particular person. I'd love to see you make one thread that shares some knowledge or wisdom that doesn't involve pedophilia, sophie, or bullshit that's been said over and over again about totse or zoklet dying. Can you please entertain me and do that? I am being sincere here. -
2016-08-26 at 11:18 AM UTCUsers like psychomanthis and Lanny (both having been moderators, btw) have been advertising for years that nothing needs to be on topic. According to them, any mindless shithead can come into any on-topic, good, thread and post whatever, whenever, however they want to. They can even post dumb little kiddie pics which have nothing to do with the topic, contentless babble, and other mindless kidiot drivel. I kid you not. Lanny and psychomanthis both supported this, even going so far as to put infractions and bans on people who were actually posting valid content, while at the same time allowing the off-topic kidiots to post whatever they want. And now you want to change things, at this late date. Really? Why now? Why not then? Are we to suppose that what was good for the goose then is suddenly something to be frowned upon when the gander does it now? I think not.
-
2016-08-26 at 11:44 AM UTC
Users like psychomanthis and Lanny (both having been moderators, btw) have been advertising for years that nothing needs to be on topic. According to them, any mindless shithead can come into any on-topic, good, thread and post whatever, whenever, however they want to. They can even post dumb little kiddie pics which have nothing to do with the topic, contentless babble, and other mindless kidiot drivel. I kid you not. Lanny and psychomanthis both supported this, even going so far as to put infractions and bans on people who were actually posting valid content, while at the same time allowing the off-topic kidiots to post whatever they want. And now you want to change things, at this late date. Really? Why now? Why not then? Are we to suppose that what was good for the goose then is suddenly something to be frowned upon when the gander does it now? I think not.
Let me do my spectral impression real quick.
*Clears throat*
Users like spectral and daguru (one having been a moderator, btw) have been advertising for years that nothing needs to be on topic. According to them, any mindless shithead can come into any on-topic, good, thread and post whatever, whenever, however they want to. They can even post dumb little tirades which have nothing to do with the topic, contentless babble, and other mindless kidiot drivel. I kid you not. daguru and spectral both supported this, even going so far as to put protest infractions and bans on people who were actually posting no useful content, while at the same time allowing the on-topic users to get sidetracked . And now you want to change things, at this late date. Really? Why now? Why not then? Are we to suppose that what was good for the goose then is suddenly something to be frowned upon when the gander does it now? I think not[greentext]>5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.[/greentext]
Twenty-five rules of disinformation
Duck and dive 305. I know it well.
