User Controls
Fucking Physics.
-
2017-10-13 at 4 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 4:02 PM UTCAdd more cardio and be huge in no time
-
2017-10-13 at 4:02 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 4:04 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 4:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Think of an ant. It can lift up to 100 times its own weight. Imagine trying to lift 100 people over your head. Seems impossible, but yet it's obviously possible. Size has very little to do with it. It's more about the mechanics involved than size.
Originally posted by -SpectraL But if everything is in ratio, it should figure, no matter what the size. I mean if a person is 1 foot tall, and they can lift 100 people over their head, and then you have a person 10 feet tall who can't, why would the 1-foot-tall person succeed where the 10-foot-tall person couldn't? Just because they are 9 feet taller?
Nigga, are you fucking retarded? Square cube law, dumbass. -
2017-10-13 at 5 PM UTCHmm well the only other thing I can think of is it must just be a shitty muscle part genetically. I think just about everyone has one.
-
2017-10-13 at 5:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock no…size has everything to do with it in that example. the ants can only perform those feats precisely due to their size.
for example. if an ant was scaled up to the size of a human it would literally collapsed upon itself due to the weight of its own body.
a human sized animal / insect would be incapable of lifting such a load due the ratio of load-weight to lifting-body weight.
What the fuck are you talking about? Ants have hydraulics. You can't compare their muscles to ours. If we had hydraulics we could lift at a similar rate.
Post last edited by 霍比特人说中文不好 at 2017-10-13T17:09:56.397945+00:00 -
2017-10-13 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 5:11 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 5:17 PM UTC"The square–cube law (or cube–square law) is a mathematical principle, applied in a variety of scientific fields, which describes the relationship between the volume and the area as a shape's size increases or decreases. … This principle states that, as a shape grows in size, its volume grows faster than its surface area."
^ I don't see how this applies to the idea of increased gravity decreasing capability. -
2017-10-13 at 6:06 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 6:08 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 6:16 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 6:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好 Doesn't even apply you dumb fucking mouse
Yes it does you stupid faggot.
In biological structures, structural strength is roughly related (although it's a bit more complex) to the cross-sectional area of their musculature, skeletal system etc.
Ants blown up to our scale would literally collapse under their own weight. An ant can lift ten times its own weight because the ratio between its strength and its weight is high as fuck. At its size, it can support 10x its own weight. It does not scale linearly. As an example, elephants break giant bones simply by falling over. That's because of the square cube law. -
2017-10-13 at 9:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好 What the fuck are you talking about? Ants have hydraulics. You can't compare their muscles to ours. If we had hydraulics we could lift at a similar rate.
Post last edited by 霍比特人说中文不好 at 2017-10-13T17:09:56.397945+00:00
good job doctor doolittle. that's obviously the only plausible explanation. -
2017-10-13 at 9:10 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 9:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock you are literally retarded. now you're just Bill Krozby-ing. using actual words that you've heard smarter people say in an instance you have no clue whatsoever about.
Not at all. Just because you don't understand why something is relevant doesn't mean it isn't relevant. -
2017-10-13 at 9:16 PM UTCWhat an easy explanation. I'm not going to bother explaining it to someone who thinks jail is the same thing as prison.
-
2017-10-13 at 9:25 PM UTC
-
2017-10-13 at 9:33 PM UTC^thinks prison and jail are the same
