User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2020-01-31 at 6:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist They couldn’t even come up with a way to get rid of it when they had a republican senate and House 😁
Honestly i wasn't sure if they repealed any part of it but its absolutely hilarious to me that he just didn't vote on it. Talk about do nothing democrats lmao. At least the house votes on bills. -
2020-01-31 at 10:36 PM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 2:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker We? Are you British?
'We' as in the allies. But no, my ancestors fought under a union jack during the wars. Commonwealth. My ancestors went to war when Britain declared it. That changed in Korea, when the USA declared war, my grandpa went to fight. Under a union jack. -
2020-02-01 at 2:49 AM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 5 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam 'We' as in the allies. But no, my ancestors fought under a union jack during the wars. Commonwealth. My ancestors went to war when Britain declared it. That changed in Korea, when the USA declared war, my grandpa went to fight. Under a union jack.
The US had nothing to do with middle east policy in the 10's, 20's, 30's, or 40's. It wasn't until 1948 with the formation of the UN that US started trying to mess about in the shit Britain had spent 100 years fucking up. So as a US citizen I take no responsibility on my nations part for the problem in that region. That is not to say that the way past administration have dealt with since then were correct and they were certainly not effective. -
2020-02-01 at 6:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The US had nothing to do with middle east policy in the 10's, 20's, 30's, or 40's. It wasn't until 1948 with the formation of the UN that US started trying to mess about in the shit Britain had spent 100 years fucking up. So as a US citizen I take no responsibility on my nations part for the problem in that region. That is not to say that the way past administration have dealt with since then were correct and they were certainly not effective.
Nothing? If US hadn't joined the war, Britain would've been on the losing side, no? Then the Ottomans would still have Jerusalem. The butterfly effect is profound when it comes to foreign meddling. US and Britain have been best buddies in fucking around the world since the Opium wars.
We're all really part of the New World Order
-
2020-02-01 at 12:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Besides Trumps USMCA what has the house passed since 2018?
Lol what are you serious. Don't make me dig up the lists I've posted before. Moscow Mitch literally has accepted the role of a bill grim reaper.
And this says nothing to refute yhat the ACA is still alive and well. -
2020-02-01 at 1:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Nothing? If US hadn't joined the war, Britain would've been on the losing side, no? Then the Ottomans would still have Jerusalem. The butterfly effect is profound when it comes to foreign meddling. US and Britain have been best buddies in fucking around the world since the Opium wars.
We're all really part of the New World Order
The French and British would have won without the US involvement. It just would have taken another year. The Germans lost World War I at home due to economic unrest and lack of support for the war by the civilian populace. The Ottoman Empire was in it's death throes and Jerusalem was not theirs to start with. -
2020-02-01 at 9:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Nothing? If US hadn't joined the war, Britain would've been on the losing side, no?
Not not at all, check your history, Russia made the greatest contribution to Hitlers defeat...the result would have been the same without the US, Russia would have streamrolled over the retreating German army and took Berlin regardless. It might have taken a little longer but the result would have been the same, re: Germany's defeat.
The main contribution as far as as the US goes was avoiding post world war Europe being Russian as I'm sure Stalin would have kept going.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-01 at 9:49 PM UTCOn topic.
EXONERATION #2 INCOMING. -
2020-02-01 at 9:59 PM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 10:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Not not at all, check your history, Russia made the greatest contribution to Hitlers defeat…the result would have been the same without the US, Russia would have streamrolled over the retreating German army and took Berlin regardless. It might have taken a little longer but the result would have been the same, re: Germany's defeat.
The main contribution as far as as the US goes was avoiding post world war Europe being Russian as I'm sure Stalin would have kept going.
No I'm talking about WWI here. That's when Jerusalem and Palestine fell to the allies.
Russia quit WWI in 1917. If it weren't for the Americans replacing them, it'd be pretty bad.
Even in WWII, people forget that majority of the trucks, steel, ammo, gasoline, steel and jeeps that the Russians used, came from the US. Shipped via the middle east or some of it through the arctic. Again meddling. Fact is Russia would've never been able to make the push to Berlin without US help. They'd have to walk.
Hell that's one of the reasons why the US was never actually neutral during WWII. The Germans were being killed by US equipment in both Russia and in North Africa, long before the US officially joined the war.The United States delivered to the Soviet Union from October 1, 1941, to May 31, 1945 the following: 427,284 trucks, 13,303 combat vehicles, 35,170 motorcycles, 2,328 ordnance service vehicles, 2,670,371 tons of petroleum products (gasoline and oil) or 57.8 percent of the high-octane aviation fuel,[32] 4,478,116 tons of foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.), 1,911 steam locomotives, 66 diesel locomotives, 9,920 flat cars, 1,000 dump cars, 120 tank cars, and 35 heavy machinery cars.
From wiki. 2000 locomotives and half a million trucks can move a lot of soldiers. And who knows where Russia would be without the four and a half million tonnes of food and two and a half million tonnes of petrol. People forget that wars since WWII are won by the internal combustion engine. Or hell even here the steam engine. Your gun is useless unless you can get it into position.
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The French and British would have won without the US involvement. It just would have taken another year. The Germans lost World War I at home due to economic unrest and lack of support for the war by the civilian populace. The Ottoman Empire was in it's death throes and Jerusalem was not theirs to start with.
US involvement started in 1914. They sold to the Brits, but couldn't sell to the Germans. If US didn't supply Britain, WWI would've been over way sooner. The US supplying Britain is why Germany started attacking American shipping. If you don't meddle, you don't get attacked.
Again, there's more ways of killing Germans than sending soldiers. US was in the business of killing Germans from 1914-1918 and 1939-1945, as part of the New World Order.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-02 at 1:04 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Not not at all, check your history, Russia made the greatest contribution to Hitlers defeat…the result would have been the same without the US, Russia would have streamrolled over the retreating German army and took Berlin regardless. It might have taken a little longer but the result would have been the same, re: Germany's defeat.
The main contribution as far as as the US goes was avoiding post world war Europe being Russian as I'm sure Stalin would have kept going.
We were talking about WWI -
2020-02-06 at 12:06 PM UTCAcquitted.
-
2020-02-06 at 12:12 PM UTC
-
2020-02-06 at 1:05 PM UTC
-
2020-02-06 at 1:31 PM UTC^lmao
crickets...
*where all the crazy Dems at today?
i wanna hear their new conspiracy theories for their next impeachment. -
2020-02-06 at 7:03 PM UTC
-
2020-02-06 at 7:10 PM UTC
-
2020-02-06 at 7:16 PM UTCOn to the next investigation...
*bullshit,made up one
