Legal standpoint of me selling my nude pictures of when I was a child

1. 2019-11-27 at 5:12 AM UTC

   #21
   

   MexicanMasterRace Black Hole

   Originally posted by Sophie What do you do when you want to legislate against a demand? You make it cost-prohibitive for everyone from start to finish. I don't advocate for this, in fact i called it draconian. Is it right? No. Does it work? Better than current laws i'd wager. I just hope everyone who read that and found themselves agreeing with anything i said at any point in that posts has a good long think on why it would be a slippery slope.

   
   I mean, I don't think it's draconian so much as plain unjust. Draconian would be sentencing the responsible parties to immediate death. But sentencing parties who are NOT irresponsible, is unjust. Would it work? Maybe. But at what cost?
2. 2019-11-27 at 5:59 AM UTC

   #22
   

   Speedy Parker Black Hole

   Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I mean, I don't think it's draconian so much as plain unjust. Draconian would be sentencing the responsible parties to immediate death. But sentencing parties who are NOT irresponsible, is unjust. Would it work? Maybe. But at what cost?

   
   In the strictest use of Draconian you are right. But doesn't affect Sophie's statement one way or the other for you to latch on to one word in it in an attempt to be right about something.
3. 2019-11-27 at 6:03 AM UTC

   #23
   

   MexicanMasterRace Black Hole

   Originally posted by Speedy Parker In the strictest use of Draconian you are right. But doesn't affect Sophie's statement one way or the other for you to latch on to one word in it in an attempt to be right about something.

   
   Ok Boomer
4. 2019-11-27 at 6:06 AM UTC

   #24
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace So many things wrong with this. Should car manufacturers be liable for crashes? Computer manufacturers for hacking? Gun manufacturers for gun violence?

   
   yes.
   
   https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sandy-hook-families-can-sue-gun-maker-remington-arms-supreme-court-rules-today-2019-11-12/
5. 2019-11-27 at 3:14 PM UTC

   #25
   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by Speedy Parker What if her intent is to aroused guys on the bus who get aroused by breast feeding?

   
   She'll get 15yrs like this chick did...
   
   
6. 2019-11-27 at 3:26 PM UTC

   #26
   

   Speedy Parker Black Hole

   Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Ok Boomer

   
   It must suck to have nothing but that and be 🇲🇽
7. 2019-11-27 at 3:26 PM UTC

   #27
   

   Archer513 African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson She'll get 15yrs like this chick did…
   
   

   
   Smash
8. 2019-11-27 at 3:28 PM UTC

   #28
   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole
   She had a whole youtube channel full of these (might still be up), she got away with it because breast feeding apparently is ok on youtube...99% of her subs were 50yr old men though.
   
   She got busted after selling "private videos" of her playing with the kids willy while he sucked her tit"
   
   EDIT: 10yrs not 15...
   
   https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/11/15/mom-breastfeeding-videos-sentenced-facing-additional-charges/2003624002/
9. 2019-11-27 at 3:55 PM UTC

   #29
   

   Archer513 African Astronaut
   Freak
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • MexicanMasterRace
10. 2019-11-27 at 4:44 PM UTC

    #30
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson She had a whole youtube channel full of these (might still be up), she got away with it because breast feeding apparently is ok on youtube…99% of her subs were 50yr old men though.
    
    She got busted after selling "private videos" of her playing with the kids willy while he sucked her tit"
    
    EDIT: 10yrs not 15…
    
    https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/11/15/mom-breastfeeding-videos-sentenced-facing-additional-charges/2003624002/

    
    abuses are in the eyes of the beholder.