User Controls
Why did they call the Nazis 'national socialists'
-
2019-10-18 at 8:28 PM UTCBureaucracy has nothing to do with it. If there was no bureaucracy, no regulation, people would have even more ability to unionize.
And you don't need a union to strike but you need a union to collectively bargain. Which is rather the point. -
2019-10-18 at 9:11 PM UTC
-
2019-10-18 at 9:37 PM UTCNational Bolshevism is the wave of the future, and we will put National Socialists in the oven right alongaside the Capitalists, Social Democrats, Liberals and the jedis.
-
2019-10-18 at 9:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost I agree. And that would be a much better system because you couldn't force people to join unions
They don't force anyone to join unions as it is. The unions have contracts worked out with those employers so they can't hire union workers. All parties involved did it voluntarily. You're not forced to join shit. Why should they be forced to hire you despite you not meeting their contractual requirements? -
2019-10-18 at 9:50 PM UTCIt's required by law that you have to be in a union
-
2019-10-18 at 9:54 PM UTC
-
2019-10-18 at 9:56 PM UTC
-
2019-10-18 at 10:28 PM UTCEnough talk. When will NEETS unionise and seize their birthright, by God and by Nature, as our natural leaders and aristocracy?
-
2019-10-18 at 11:29 PM UTC
-
2019-10-18 at 11:31 PM UTC
-
2019-10-19 at 12:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi Nobody would work under poor conditions, they can just leave and work somewhere else!
Much smaller than Tuff-Shed housing now giving to homeless. they get a luxery compared to the conditions they got living under highways, but of course, as I suspected a White Over Weight female in the news says "It's too small for them.. I'm concerned its too small" and people like her will sue Oakland or San Francisco and shut them down until the lawsuit is finalized and making tons of money for Attorneys while these people are forced out of their new digs and into the streets,The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-10-19 at 12:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost And what is this 'government' composed of?
It's still a government. But the people own the industries. Like in Norway, they have one of the biggest oil companies in the world and the people all get a stake in that. Profits go directly towards healthcare and schooling and housing and such. Though Norway is a rather un-repeatable example of socialism gone right because they struck it richhh -
2019-10-19 at 2:36 AM UTC
-
2019-10-19 at 5:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi Unions are the free market solution where people with a backbone band together for their interests. Rather than your pinko commie solution to have big daddy handle it for you.
no, once they've unionize into a single entity it becomes a monopoly.
a mono fucking poly. and theres nothing free market about a mono, fucking, poly.
workers unions are really a protection racket, you pay your dues as a member of the worker gang, and they try to protect you from the other gangs,
such as the manufacturers associations, tobacco groups, etc etc. ie, capitalist gangs. -
2019-10-19 at 5:28 AM UTCand like gangs, sometimes they win, sometimes they loose.
first they lose, then they become loose. -
2019-10-19 at 5:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country National Bolshevism is the wave of the future, and we will put National Socialists in the oven right alongaside the Capitalists, Social Democrats, Liberals and the jedis.
democracy is already a form of bolshevism.
bolshevicks are the majority, -
2019-10-19 at 9:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny doesnt make sense.
jobs are created by productivity.
not work hours.
fuck are you on about? scale it down for simplicity. a small island nation of five people has 100 man hours to keep their small island nation running efficiently. everything from farming, building, repairing, making anything needed, even entertainment, everything. if the leader decides to set the working week to 20 hours then that divides up perfectly and everyone has 20 hours of work each week. but if he was to set the working week to 25 hours then they will have 1 person left without work. if he set the working week to 33 hours then that leaves 2 people without work. its basic math that applies to a large population of millions just the same way. any country could end unemployment by dividing the amount of man hours with the working population and setting the answer to the working week for that country. but pretty much none do because the rich are greedy control freaks who will use the means of production to retain control over the rest of the population for themselves. our means of production should be working to the benefit of us all, not just the few tho.
. -
2019-10-19 at 10:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily No, they do it so idiots like you rely on the government and continue to vote for bigger government because that's the only way they'll get more power - they need products of dysgenics like you so you keep voting for them to look after you, and you need them to give you money because you are too low IQ or fucked up to make it on your own. Your existence literally relies on cunts like Theresa May or May Not, hence why you're approaching 50, addicted to heroin, have no independence and claim welfare (which you will continue to do until you die) - this is all so some power hungry cunt reaches his or her goals
The biodiversity within species is fascinating
i've only ever voted once in my life when i was 18, i voted for the natural law party just for the novelty. never voted since because its a pointless facade designed to keep gullible cunts like you living in a fantasy world where your vote gives you a say(lolmao) and the poor are your enemy when in reality the rich are.
and you think i need to claim benefits? lol, the benefits pay me £125 a week. i make more than that most days, drawing benefits for me is just some pocket change that i draw because this society owes me. plus obviously if you don't draw benefits then you get the state pulling you up asking awkward questions about what you're living on and the legality of it, and why you not paid taxes and all that bollocks.
. -
2019-10-19 at 10:14 AM UTC
-
2019-10-19 at 10:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc fuck are you on about? scale it down for simplicity. a small island nation of five people has 100 man hours to keep their small island nation running efficiently. everything from farming, building, repairing, making anything needed, even entertainment, everything. if the leader decides to set the working week to 20 hours then that divides up perfectly and everyone has 20 hours of work each week. but if he was to set the working week to 25 hours then they will have 1 person left without work. if he set the working week to 33 hours then that leaves 2 people without work. its basic math that applies to a large population of millions just the same way. any country could end unemployment by dividing the amount of man hours with the working population and setting the answer to the working week for that country. but pretty much none do because the rich are greedy control freaks who will use the means of production to retain control over the rest of the population for themselves. our means of production should be working to the benefit of us all, not just the few tho.
.
you are smart but not so when it comes to this matters.
go to your local eatery or any other restaurant and find out the reason why they needed to hire as much cook/waiters/esses as they currently do.
