User Controls
The Real War on Science: The Left has done far more than the Right to set back progress.
-
2017-01-14 at 7:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Also, i hardly think "minorities" whatever that means, would be persecuted in such a fashion. Instead, i would envision a state which places importance on the national interest, nuclear family and all that good stuff. But really, authoritarianism in any form is far removed from any political situation i would consider ideal.
Well gays are probably the largest demographic but chronophiles would seem the be the pertinent one. Western conservatism has generally been hostile towards these groups, often citing (in pretense or genuine position I couldn't say) interests of the institution of the nuclear family as justification. -
2017-01-14 at 7:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I love how the militant left has unwittingly created a militant right.
I've pondered this, and the dynamics are somewhat interesting. Vast array of tactics to marginalize/harm groups in disagreement with them, regardless of the accuracy of their perception. Social taboo and propaganda (lies/disinformation) will push people away, making them less representative of the general population, a more extreme sample. And people of course are going to react in like, generally.
"Well, these leftists started screeching at me, demeaning me in every possible way, made countless assumptions and distortions of my views and arguments, then told me that the real reason for my views/positions were are all for the worst possibilities. So I was pretty convinced and now I'm a Bernie Sanders supporter."
Of course in their view they're righteous. Well, don't complain, this is the outcome of your actions. -
2017-01-14 at 7:35 AM UTCI consider it my god-given mission to shill leftism in the most racist, bigoted, extreme-right corners of the internet in the name human understandingThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-01-14 at 7:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I consider it my god-given mission to shill leftism in the most racist, bigoted, extreme-right corners of the internet in the name human understanding
Ugh, "leftism", the very word is revolting.
-
2017-01-14 at 7:54 AM UTCWhat are your thoughts on Kropotkin?
-
2017-01-14 at 8:15 AM UTCThe right is where the term victim stems from. Don't tread on me= victim
-
2017-01-14 at 9:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny What are your thoughts on Kropotkin?
I don't associate with anarcho-commie fuccbois. The black-red and the black-gold are fundamentally incompatible. -
2017-01-14 at 12:57 PM UTCin other news: scientists have found a way to produce spider silk
http://www.slu.se/en/ew-news/2017/1/spinning-spider-silk-is-now-possible/
also: the tightest know yet:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170112141220.htm
if you combine the two, does that mean we will have super strong bondage ropes? -
2017-01-14 at 7:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I don't associate with anarcho-commie fuccbois. The black-red and the black-gold are fundamentally incompatible.
why? -
2017-01-14 at 7:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I consider it my god-given mission to shill leftism in the most racist, bigoted, extreme-right corners of the internet in the name human understanding
i'm sure your cripple-ideology sincerely thanks you for your service, and the sacrifice of your individual masculine faculties. RIP. Gods Chosen People™ will fondly remember you for your part in helping bring about an undifferentiated slave-class. you are truly a hero for your efforts towards the inversion of virtue. -
2017-01-14 at 7:56 PM UTCYou seem a little upset friend, what's the problem?
-
2017-01-14 at 8:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny why?
Because everyone owning the means of production and wealth being equally distributed among everyone does not follow the principles of the free-market. Not only that, who is going to enforce this rule you have in AnCom that everyone owns an equal share of the means of production and that wealth gets evenly distributed? A government? Then you just lost the Anaracho part of Anacrho-communism. -
2017-01-14 at 8:47 PM UTCtelling someone they seem upset when they communicate to you that they consider you garbage is strange, but it's predictable for the way a leftist ideologues mind would work.
consider the following.
situation A. I am not upset. You say I seem upset. You have confirmed my suspicions that you are frequently incorrect.
situation B. I am emotionally disturbed because someone has taken it upon themselves to champion the collection of idea's that the state, the media, academia, and the current mainstream of 'hip and trendy' entertainment and culture vectors all express with rabid vitriol, while condemning their opponents as everything evil under the sun, in a place on the internet where people who are characteristically different from their peers in some way or against authority, common ways of thinking, 'the system', etc gather.
if situation B is the case, and, as implied by your snarky passive aggressive tone, you take pleasure in having brought consternation upon someone, that does nothing except establish your lack of good faith in the people you have chosen to speak with, and the moral quality of your inclinations - you would be using your intellect (such as it is) for the purpose of despoiling and agitating in the name of some ideology which you would, hopefully, consider virtuous and beneficial to the human race, or at the very least, yourself. such would be a natural and wholesome use of your capacity to think and communicate with others, and even if i disagreed with you, it would be shameful of me to take your good faith and abuse it by appearing to speak to idea's, while really, i was only seeking to make you feel bad.
it would be shameful because for a person to make other persons negative feelings a goal would prove that they were rather not a man, but a crab, a slimy bottom feeding crustacean, who feeds on bits of hurt from others out of some fucked up psychological predicament on their part.
i would propose that if a person had such psychologically degenerate tendencies, it would be necessary for them to conceal, not from others, but from themselves, the natures of their actions, by replacing their own thoughts with some sort of given code - no, not a code, an alignment to a group that they imagine supports them, or in any case, gives them the sensation of a tribe having their back. it would not be necessary for you to really believe that i am enraged or saddened by your words; it is actually only necessary for you to make me believe that YOU believe it.
the kind of behavior that we see here expresses that what is important to you, is what you think i think about you; i have become nothing to you but a fetish, a mockup of some internal conflict that you use as a mirror to place yourself in exactly the conflict narrative which you have, through years of self neglect, become accustomed to.
we can probably make a correlation between the left's perpetual dissatisfaction here. you choose this, of all places, to ply your trade - because it affords you the pablum for your replacement-fantasies. similarly, there is no end to the cry for 'equality' from the left, no matter what has been given as concession, it can never be enough, it must end only in a perfect inversion of values; strength is mocked, truth is denied, structure is destroyed, what was, is not, what was not, is. foul is fair and fair is foul. when the generation of german jedis who saw hitler died, by necessity, studies indicating that trauma can be passed on genetically will be required, because trauma is the foundation of leftism. when an employer is no longer free to hire who he pleases, and exclude blacks if he thinks that they aren't suitable, that will not be enough: because of some supposed crime against blacks in the past, we will be required to hire the dis-proportionally. nothing will ever be enough. if the time comes that all money is redistributed, the outcry will come that 10% of the population experiences 90% of the happiness, and they will demand that law is put into place to rectify this. we see the outcome in several of the european countries farther along that path of 'progress'; the idea has actually become, and i do not paraphrase, "that all interactions between citizens are inherently unequal, and so citizens must only interact with the government in all meaningful ways, so that inequality can finally end".
what depravity. -
2017-01-14 at 8:52 PM UTCwho cares. science will destroy the world
-
2017-01-14 at 8:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib telling someone they seem upset when they communicate to you that they consider you garbage is strange, but it's predictable for the way a leftist ideologues mind would work.
consider the following.
situation A. I am not upset. You say I seem upset. You have confirmed my suspicions that you are frequently incorrect.
situation B. I am emotionally disturbed because someone has taken it upon themselves to champion the collection of idea's that the state, the media, academia, and the current mainstream of 'hip and trendy' entertainment and culture vectors all express with rabid vitriol, while condemning their opponents as everything evil under the sun, in a place on the internet where people who are characteristically different from their peers in some way or against authority, common ways of thinking, 'the system', etc gather.
if situation B is the case, and, as implied by your snarky passive aggressive tone, you take pleasure in having brought consternation upon someone, that does nothing except establish your lack of good faith in the people you have chosen to speak with, and the moral quality of your inclinations - you would be using your intellect (such as it is) for the purpose of despoiling and agitating in the name of some ideology which you would, hopefully, consider virtuous and beneficial to the human race, or at the very least, yourself. such would be a natural and wholesome use of your capacity to think and communicate with others, and even if i disagreed with you, it would be shameful of me to take your good faith and abuse it by appearing to speak to idea's, while really, i was only seeking to make you feel bad.
it would be shameful because for a person to make other persons negative feelings a goal would prove that they were rather not a man, but a crab, a slimy bottom feeding crustacean, who feeds on bits of hurt from others out of some fucked up psychological predicament on their part.
i would propose that if a person had such psychologically degenerate tendencies, it would be necessary for them to conceal, not from others, but from themselves, the natures of their actions, by replacing their own thoughts with some sort of given code - no, not a code, an alignment to a group that they imagine supports them, or in any case, gives them the sensation of a tribe having their back. it would not be necessary for you to really believe that i am enraged or saddened by your words; it is actually only necessary for you to make me believe that YOU believe it.
the kind of behavior that we see here expresses that what is important to you, is what you think i think about you; i have become nothing to you but a fetish, a mockup of some internal conflict that you use as a mirror to place yourself in exactly the conflict narrative which you have, through years of self neglect, become accustomed to.
we can probably make a correlation between the left's perpetual dissatisfaction here. you choose this, of all places, to ply your trade - because it affords you the pablum for your replacement-fantasies. similarly, there is no end to the cry for 'equality' from the left, no matter what has been given as concession, it can never be enough, it must end only in a perfect inversion of values; strength is mocked, truth is denied, structure is destroyed, what was, is not, what was not, is. foul is fair and fair is foul. when the generation of german jedis who saw hitler died, by necessity, studies indicating that trauma can be passed on genetically will be required, because trauma is the foundation of leftism. when an employer is no longer free to hire who he pleases, and exclude blacks if he thinks that they aren't suitable, that will not be enough: because of some supposed crime against blacks in the past, we will be required to hire the dis-proportionally. nothing will ever be enough. if the time comes that all money is redistributed, the outcry will come that 10% of the population experiences 90% of the happiness, and they will demand that law is put into place to rectify this. we see the outcome in several of the european countries farther along that path of 'progress'; the idea has actually become, and i do not paraphrase, "that all interactions between citizens are inherently unequal, and so citizens must only interact with the government in all meaningful ways, so that inequality can finally end".
what depravity.
You're wasting your time, Lanny only argues with people when they lack the ability to argue back. When they raise valid points he deflects with a patronizing quip along the lines of the response you got. -
2017-01-14 at 9:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by greenplastic You're wasting your time, Lanny only argues with people when they lack the ability to argue back. When they raise valid points he deflects with a patronizing quip along the lines of the response you got.
thanks for the warning -
2017-01-14 at 10:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Because everyone owning the means of production and wealth being equally distributed among everyone does not follow the principles of the free-market. Not only that, who is going to enforce this rule you have in AnCom that everyone owns an equal share of the means of production and that wealth gets evenly distributed? A government? Then you just lost the Anaracho part of Anacrho-communism.
Aren't you the one who's always telling us no rules doesn't mean no rules? -
2017-01-14 at 10:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib that does nothing except establish your lack of good faith in the people you have chosen to speak with, and the moral quality of your inclinations
Originally posted by snab_snib yes i did, you fucking illiterate peabrain.
…
"huurrrr durrrr, widout skool, HOW WILL WE KNOW HOW TO READ??????"
…
lmfao, you're so fucking basic. you seriously fucking believe this shit holy shit lmfao
…
in summary, kill yourself you stupid nigger.
Could you explain more about this good faith thing? -
2017-01-14 at 10:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Aren't you the one who's always telling us no rules doesn't mean no rules?
No rulers doesn't mean no rules. And i say that because in an anarcho-capitalist society the rules would be dictated by the free market, by demand, and a theory of ethics based on the non-aggression principle and property rights. -
2017-01-14 at 10:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by greenplastic You're wasting your time, Lanny only argues with people when they lack the ability to argue back. When they raise valid points he deflects with a patronizing quip along the lines of the response you got.
Lol, do you mention this because the post you quoted was a well formed argument with valid points?
