Literally bullshit. Calling someone who uses violence to further a specific political goal a terrorist is correct. Calling someone who does so to further the domination goals of their religion a "insert religion here" terrorists is also correct. Calling someone a christian terrorist because they used violence to further a specific political agenda and happen to be christian is bullshit.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
Literally bullshit. Calling someone who uses violence to further a specific political goal a terrorist is correct. Calling someone who does so to further the domination goals of their religion a "insert religion here" terrorists is also correct. Calling someone a christian terrorist because they used violence to further a specific political agenda and happen to be christian is bullshit.
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
Literally bullshit. Calling someone who uses violence to further a specific political goal a terrorist is correct. Calling someone who does so to further the domination goals of their religion a "insert religion here" terrorists is also correct. Calling someone a christian terrorist because they used violence to further a specific political agenda and happen to be christian is bullshit.
What a fucking retard. Can't wait till you kick the bucket. Shouldn't be long with your age and health.
Literally every religion facilitates terrorism if you use it the wrong way. There are Hindus in India killing beef eaters. In Sri Lanka, Buddhists are burning down Christian churches.
Thinking Christians are something special is fucking hilarious.
I'm growing my beard out and have been going to the local mosque every Friday. Sudo inspired me, and when I read the words of the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) I knew that I had made many mistakes. I will do right by God and live a good life, and hopefully be able to make amends for the transgressions the jedis deceived me into committing, inshallah.
الله أكبر
I dont know I just wanted to quote this again.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Not to rain on anyone's "Free From Disgusting Queer Ways" parade but most devout traditional islamics will still not fully accept a person whose been pillaged in the most vile ways to nature. About face they will show support but inside they're still repulsed.
Originally posted by G
Not to rain on anyone's "Free From Disgusting Queer Ways" parade but most devout traditional islamics will still not fully accept a person whose been pillaged in the most vile ways to nature. About face they will show support but inside they're still repulsed.
There is a third gender called hijda in Pakistan, they're considered good luck.
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
Hijras are ridiculed by most (it is extremely offensive to call someone a hijra) and most people refuse to keep them even as domestic workers.
You are incorrect and the Vice documentary or Salon article you heard that from is made for western queers like you.
Originally posted by Big League jedi
There is a third gender called hijda in Pakistan, they're considered good luck.
That's a tiny % of the religion as a whole & was brought out of the need of being represented in dire/harsh conditions. The same acceptance/tolerance will not extend to a civilized/1st world setting.
Originally posted by G
That's a tiny % of the religion as a whole & was brought out of the need of being represented in dire/harsh conditions. The same acceptance/tolerance will not extend to a civilized/1st world setting.
Sure it will, many 1st world Muslims are quite progressive.
